Posted on 08/08/2010 9:05:40 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
(watch vid at link)
Rev Manning straight up:
Video in summary-- although the MSM actively seeks to cover up for Obama,--Fox News, and most every high ranking conservative all know Obama is ineligible but they are held hostage to speak it.
And some go even further, like O'Reilly to ridicule those that ask the reasonable and responsible questions any thinking human being, any decent American citizen, should ask--why this most powerful man in the world should not be held to explain the missing, hidden, opaque, inconsistent and contradictory information on his personal, professional, academic and political background. And then provide proof.
These conservstive mavens know in their heart of hearts Obama is full of lies and deliberately manufactured information, but they have made the treasonous decision to cover up for this most powerful man on the planet....
A man that has command of our military forces, the FBI, the Treasury et al, and who is shaping the world we live in. A demontrated con man ruining our blood-fought, exceptional country, unlike any that has ever existed on earth.
If untrue, open up why don't you, Barack H. Soetoro/Obama....clean up the questions, set the record straight, out in the open. Make believers out of us with facts and transparency.
But the real question goes to the conservative mavens. What would Thomas Jefferson do, Glenn Beck?
Would he roll over and shut his mouth while our precious America is being whittled away by a slick con?
ttp://www.youtube.com/user/ATLAHWorldwide#p/u/6/DV0RAuU0n2o
The imperial Centurion guard does not need to base his position on information.
Just as Obama ‘knew’ the Cambridge police acted stupidly, Centurion KNOWS what is “true” about the BC.
Hey, who needs info to lock into an “informed” opinion, right?
Let’s assume this guy Manning is right that Obama did work for the CIA. That might explain the so called dozen or so socil security numbers, but you would think there would be one person somewhere who remembered him? It’s like aliens from outer space...you can talk all day about UFOs but give one piece of evidence, one tail pipe from a spaceshift, one blood cell from a dying alien, etc.
My take is that it’s much simpler than anyone believes. The man has conned his way into places and positions all his life. He probably entered School on a Fulbright Scholarship and that’s why his Columbia documents are sealed.
He probably was NOT born in Hawaii but Vancouver. I doubt it was in Kenya.
I doubt too, that he was a CIA operative. What did he do? Fighting the Russians in Afghanistan in the 80s? Doing what? IF so, why don’t the Russians remember him?
How big of a Constitutional, racial, trust crisis will ensue? The people already distrust the media and the government.
The question is this......Is the damage to our institutions and form of government and civil unrest by the removal of Hussein worse than the damage he has already done and will do if given more time in office?
To me, it's a no brainer. We have the ENEMY WITHIN. Not at the gates but as the de facto 'President', 'commander and chief', middle finger on the nuclear button. A foreign and domestic ENEMY OF THE CONSTITUTION. HE HATES AMERICA, western culture, and will/is doing everything he can to bring us down. He is doing far more damage than anything that may happen with his removal from office. I agree with you.
Btw....I think most of the so called conservative talking heads are cowards. They don't even contemplate these consequences, just the consequence of not being invited on the next Fox show or or the next VIP cocktail party. Not being labeled a 'Kook'. I guess their 'patriotism' only goes so far but their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Savage and Rusty Humpries and a few others are the only ones that have discussed Barry's fraudalent past in any detail.
This is the biggest story in American History. The story that's not being told. As Jack would say, "We're running out of time".
They are entertainers posing as journalists.
My guess...Hillary knows but Obama has something on her to keep her quiet. In return for keeping quiet, he also stays quiet and to sweeten the deal, he makes her his illegal secretary of state.
Another guess...McCain purposely lost the election. He refused to go after Obama hard and went after anyone who did. He picked Palin in the hopes it would make him lose but wasn’t counting on the popularity of Palin so he kept her locked up. When he saw he was still winning, he voted for the bailout.
Let’s see...believe the Republican Gov of Hawaii & the COLB, or the Kenyan Parliament “Minsister” of Lands...who is more credible?
OK, you believe who you want & I cannot stop you. However, the courts are not likely to follow your path, nor has Rush, Hannity, Coulter, etc.
It is NOT stupidity. It is weakness of heart and fear; lack of courage, and putting self-serving desires before the public weal and truth.
I disagree. More and more people are doubting his touted personal mythology. It’s not just a simple fraud, it’s shredding the Constitution and the rule of law.
He can’t be impeached anyway, he’s not an eligible president. He could be arrested, though.
The American electorate deserve to know the truth about whoever he is. And whatever his name is.
He may not even be a US citizen at all.
Apparently you are very ill-informed. I suggest you dedicate a number of hours to studying up. Please. Then you won’t make such ill-informed statements. People on FR have been doing incredible research and posting their findings for more than 2 years. It’s too long for me to even attempt to summarize.
It’s hidden in plain sight; the dam will burst. If the topic interests you at all, do some FR searches and read up.
I don’t think you can speak for the American people. More are waking up and I think a large portion of them would want to know the truth about 0thugga and his non-eligibility.
It would throw the country into chaos if the truth were revealed??? How about the chaos which is sure to happen if the lies continue? The shredding of the Constitution? The pissing on the rule of law? That’s much worse than any street demonstrations or “chaos” that the truth would cause. Infinitely worse. Incomparably worse.
They’ve been threatened/bribed/blackmailed and/or they’re more concerned about ratings and money than truth. They’re afraid of ridicule because of their addiction to adulation. Any or all of the above, imo.
Exactly. And these people who haunt the eligibility threads saying it’s hopeless, a non-issue, we’re all nuts, and the like are obviously not spending their valuable time fighting his agenda. Which is what they say everyone should be doing.
No no no, they spend their valuable time pissing on these threads like the a**holes that they are.
I don’t read their comments unless by mistake as my eyes scan down the thread. Just like avoid investigating piles of dog poop on the sidewalk. I avert my eyes and look just closely enough to avoid stepping in it.
btrl
There is no requirement to prove eligibility, but there is a Constitutional requirement to be eligible. Thus when so many questions arose about eligibility, questions far out of the ordinary for other presidential candidates, inquires should have been made, and proof requested, or subpoenaed. But there was that nasty "standing" issue. No other candidate (a) wanted to be called racist or (b) did not have major skeletons in their own closet, to challenge BHO on eligibility. Not even in states where other candidates for President have been kept off the ballots for ineligibility, either due to age or lack of Natural Born status.
There is plenty of such evidence. Enough "probable cause" to generate subpoenas for the definitive evidence. Statements by members of the Kenyan parliament, in the official record. Statements in various African news outlets. Early stories from before BHO was a candidate for President. All of them pointing to a non-US birth.
You think that overrides the Constitutional definitioin? The Constitution' definition, is very specific. It's one of the few common law terms that is redefined in the Constitution. The reason being the recent experiences of the founding fathers with gross misuse of the charge of treason.
I'm not sure that being an ineligible usurper, or covering up for one, would meet the Constitutional definition. By itself anyway. if there were agents of foreign powers involved, then most definitely.
As you shouldn't. For one thing, it's completely inapposite to Hillary's entire primary campaign line. She spent a YEAR arguing that she could beat the Republican candidate, but that Obama could not. The entire PUMA movement was built around this argument.
So to suggest that Hillary sat on a disqualifying factor for Obama for a two-year primary campaign, in the hopes that he would win the election DESPITE her continued insistence that he couldn't, is bizarre.
Bizarre, but hardly unexpected. It's standard-issue conspiracism, really. When faced with an individual or organization whose actions completely contradict the conspiracy theory in question, simply accuse them of being secretly complicit in the conspiracy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.