Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Links:

http://www.saveourlicense.com/prop187-text.htm

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35374462/Prop-8-Ruling-FINAL

1 posted on 08/06/2010 10:46:16 AM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazminerose

We are no longer a free country.


2 posted on 08/06/2010 10:54:49 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose
Let's review....

Obamacare

Sotomayor

Kagan

Mosque at Ground Zero

Arizona being sued by the Feds

and now Prop 8 being overruled.

(and I'm sure I've forgotten a few things)

Now I know how they felt in 1776!

4 posted on 08/06/2010 11:01:09 AM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose

Yeah. With a gay judge who wanted to abuse his power to make his point. Impeach him, Californians.


5 posted on 08/06/2010 11:13:53 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose

As always, Oregon has been the pioneer in this kind of craziness. Bottle bills, medical marijuana...you name it, we do it before California, and get none of the credit. California is just catching up. Next trend will be for the Sec of State to come up with a formula for de-legitimizing signatures before these pesky referenda can even get to the ballot. Watch for it.


7 posted on 08/06/2010 11:54:44 AM PDT by gundog (Why is it that useful idiots remain idiots long after they've exhausted their usefulness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose
The judge talked a lot about stigmas and immorality, but dodged the issue of exactly where in the Constitution he found a right to marry a same sex partner.

The Constitution states what the government may do.

I can't find where in the Constitution a man and woman may marry each other.

10 posted on 08/06/2010 1:06:33 PM PDT by carenot (We'd rather hold on to the myth than fight for the reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose
I don't have a problem with a court over ruling a popular mandate IF the court's decision is based on solid constitutional principles.
11 posted on 08/06/2010 1:15:24 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose

Spit back. Use bullets.


12 posted on 08/06/2010 1:17:48 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson