Posted on 07/31/2010 6:25:47 PM PDT by jdirt
They don't have her records before 1965 !!
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Does this look correct to you?
I wish he would have put the location these actions were taken.
The 1965 application would have had Barry on it. And when he returned, he would have had to get a US passport in Indonesia, theoretically.
Also it looks to me she was using her married name in 1965. It looks like the only change was that she dropped the Dunham name.
1.March 15, 1965. Stanley Ann Dunham marries Lolo Soetoro (P1)
2.July 19, 1965. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro is issued passport number F777788. The actual application was presumed destroyed in the 1980s, but it and its date are referenced at least 3 times in subsequent documents. (P1, P3, Waiver)
3.June 29, 1967. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro applied to amend her passport to use her married name, Stanley Ann Soetoro. (P3)
4.July 19, 1968. Passport expires. (Passports issued in 1965 were good for 3 years.)
5.August 13, 1968. Stanley Ann Soetoro applies to have her passport extended (renewed) for two years, through July 18, 1970. Passports issued in 1965 could be renewed only for two years.
6.July 19, 1970. Passport Expires.
7.October 21, 1971. Stanley Ann Soetoro attempts to enter the US with an invalid (expired) passport. She requests a waiver, which is granted. (Waiver)
8.January 4, 1972. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro applies for a passport to return to Indonesia. This passport, due to a change in the law, will be valid for 5 years. (P2)
If you have corrections to this, please add them in.
The one big problem with cover ups is once you start it is very hard to stop. I have no real position on the BC issues other than I want his status as an NBC verified. BTW that will most likely not end the issue. It is my guess that his BC contains some thing he wants to hide - like you say - his race or even who his listed daddy is. Yes it could blow the lid off the country. IMHO that if preferable to the current death 0 has planned for us.
Perhaps it was amended to remove him off of hers?
If that date is correct, how does that fit the timeline of her divorce from husband #1, Obama? The divorce decree was dated March 20, 1964!
Was Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro's 2nd marriage not valid (due to bigamy)?
Logical explanation is that she screwed up and put in the date of her divorce (could have been the actual hearing date with the filing a few weeks later) instead of the date of her marriage on the passport application.
The skeptical side of me says that in an attempt to sanitize records prior to public release someone screwed up and looked up a wrong date and entered that onto the application that was sent out as hers.
I may need to adjust my tin-foil hate but honestly, with all the lies this administration has told on even the smallest item, how can we even be sure this is her actual, original record???
But lists his Race as Caucasian?
And, his mother as Madelyn Dunham?
Lotta bigamists in that family.
# 102 is important.
Also # 107 , # 123 , # 142 , # 157.
Time permitting, there are other interesting comments. Just ignore the salaried PIA SPs.
salaried [ˈsælərɪd]
adj
earning or yielding a salary; a salaried worker, salaried employment
“What is his Birth Certificate is Real... not the one weve seen, but the one others claim to have seen... what if it IS real... but...
But lists his Race as Caucasian?”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Birth certificates don’t list the race of the baby.
However, they DO list the race of the parent(s).
STE=Q
The Office of president would have to be vacant util we elected one.Not much different than now actually. With him there its the same as not haviing a president.
Get serious.
Caucasian?
Nope, that’s not the problem.
Then why would every single other of his records from kindergarten to law school to medical records etc be scrubbed, locked, sealed, hidden and/or forged?
It isn’t race.
It's not difficult.
No one has claimed to see any BC other than the fake one put up on the internet.
Joe Biden would assume office in the event that the "President" could not execute "his" duties, according to the 25th Amendment.
"Not having a president" would be preferable to what we have now (a "president" who acts in the service of our enemies!)
No we would have to have an interin govenment appointed by a joint session of Congress and the Supreme Court.Tere would be no executive branch involvement at the level of president.A military commander would fulfill that role for the time necessary..It would only be for about 16 months, and then we have a real election with real candidates.
Everyone who certified Obama fraudulently would be in jail.
Some people said she was a CIA cutout. Just about everyone working for the Ford Foundation outside of the USA had intel connections and usually liberal backgrounds.
The plan to bring Africans to study in the USA (O’s supposed father) was another Kennedy creation. Nixon opposed it.
The TV news media and TV will protect him til the bitter end including Fox/Saudia. He is the Saudis agent in the white hut. The Saudis paid good money for him and for their onwership in Fox, Time Warner, Citgroup and on and on.
Not a provlem for onama. he could actually endear himself even more to black people by simply claiming that he CHOSE to be black.
No. It isn’t the race thing. I do not believe he was born here at all. Nor do I nelieve that the thing they keep waving around is a forgery, though it is fraudulent and contains fraudulent information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.