Skip to comments.
Attack on Free Speech Continues in Senate (Democrats Seek To Close Competition)
ATR ^
| 7/27/10
| Mattie Corrao
Posted on 07/27/2010 1:17:04 PM PDT by Andrea19
After its passage in the House last month, Sen. Schumer cobbled together an almost identical version to introduced in the Senate last week. The differences between the two bills - a carve-out that eliminated the requirement for unions to disclose transfers of money to affiliates - illustrates that the bill is simply a political front for slanting the campaign finance landscape in favor of the current majority for the upcoming elections. Amongst other things, the bill:
- Mandates advocacy groups to disclose all of their donors instead of the ones funding communications, shifting the focus of current campaign finance reporting from speakers to those who associate with speakers. This makes mututally exclusive the rights to free speech and assembly in the First Amendment.
- Forces top donors to a group or corporation to appear in a political advertisement to provide a disclaimer. This assumes the top donors are the actual donors to an ad, which may not be the case, and offends to notion of privacy agreed upon by the Supreme Court in NAACP v. Alabama.
- Requires onerous disclaimers for radio and television advertisements. By some estimates, these disclaimers will take up over half of the air time for a 30 second ad, and constitute a government mandate for speech.
- Tips the balance in favor of union speech by excluding labor groups from most of the new provisions in this bill and setting arbitrary disclosure thresholds that fall just above typical union dues. This represents a stark departure from traditional campaign finance regulation, where labor unions and corprorations have been treated similarly.
- Establishes a capricious understanding of a "foreign corporation" and effectively silences millions of American workers by prohibiting political speech by such businesses...
Read more: http://www.atr.org/attack-free-speech-continues-senate-a5251#ixzz0uumkHS98
(Excerpt) Read more at atr.org ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; elections; unions
Liberals still see too many ways they could lose.
Help promote Conservative activism here & here & here
1
posted on
07/27/2010 1:17:08 PM PDT
by
Andrea19
To: Andrea19
Interesting thought about foreign.Almost every labor union includes the self identifying name “international” in its title.Hold them to their own words.
2
posted on
07/27/2010 1:40:33 PM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(I get your point. I read the book a few years ago)
To: Andrea19
And Democrats like to toss the “Nazi” slur around against Republicans?!
To: Andrea19
Lets exempt certain groups from the law like the labor unions, NAACP, acorn, and NRA and call it a level playing field. Right
4
posted on
07/27/2010 1:48:23 PM PDT
by
steveab
(When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American; xkaydet65; steveab
Good news everyone, as you may have seen on Breaking News on the right-hand side, the Disclose Act failed to break the filibuster, today. But Chucky vows to keep bringing it back...
5
posted on
07/27/2010 2:10:07 PM PDT
by
Andrea19
To: Andrea19
"the Disclose Act failed to break the filibuster, today. But Chucky vows to keep bringing it back..."That's one thing you can always count on about the devil: He don't quit.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson