Posted on 07/01/2010 7:29:33 PM PDT by StopObama2012
First, ClimateGate proved Gore is LYING about so-called "global warming," and now he's been revealed as a SEX PREDATOR!
BOOKMARK us for more GORE SEX PERVERT news!
SHARE the joy with friends! Make sure everyone knows AL GORE is a SEX PERVERT!
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
Couldn’t this be considered slander since the guy hasn’t had a trial yet, never mind been convicted? I can’t stand the guy either, but isn’t this jumping the gun a bit?
Truth is an absolute defense — against slander (spoken) and libel (written) accusations.
Also, Gore would just have to SUE people who says he’s a pervert. I doubt he wants such lawsuits to occur, as they would explore whether he is, in fact, a pervert.
This would generate publicity that perverts normally try to avoid. It would also encourage Gore’s other victims to come forward.
Also, Gore’s victim has publicly accused him of being a pervert, and has stated this clearly in the 76-page police report.
“’Like’ my Facebook group” = self-absorbed popularity contest
I’m not sure how many it takes to win but the group has gone up 3 since I first looked at it.
At this rate, the sky’s the limit.
Hopefully, everyone will become aware that Al Gore is a dangerous pervert.
Then, folks can keep their distance.
Tipper is divorcing AL after 40 years.... for a reason.
Well, is it slander or is it simply a discussion of the release of Algore’s second chakra?
Let’s put it this way. At the facebook page, you’ll find links to video animation of Al Gore sexually assaulting the masseuse.
Is that slander/libel? Or just news coverage of what she claims happened?
When anybody says “Hey, you slandered/libeled me,” you just need to say “Well, I’m telling the TRUTH, and here’s the witness (and stained pants with DNA results) to back me up. So go ahead and sue me because in court, the evidence will show that my accusation is true.”
I guess I’m not up to date on this. There are other victims? Who has reported this? Also, the reason for the Gore divorce has not been made public, AFAIK. Do you have inside knowledge?
RUSH LIMBAUGH: “I have a question about Algore and the massage therapist. The National Enquirer will not drop the story. What happens if there is a consensus that Algore assaulted the massage therapist, should we say then that the debate is over and declare him guilty?”
The TRUTH of these allegations has yet to be established, noobie. Even people we despise and believe to be guilty are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law ~ not the court of public opinion such as yours. And again, I reiterate that I can’t stand AlGore either.
Rush was being sarcastic and mocking in using AlGore’s own words regarding Global Warming against him in this quote. How does this give your premature condemnation of Gore validity?
He is quoting The Maharushie from today's (or yesterday's?) show.
Done.
If you wish to crusade for the “truth,” crusade to inform 6 billion earthlings that “global warming” is a BIG LIE designed to establish a so-called “carbon tax” and make millions/billions for Gore and his cronies via their “carbon credit exchange.”
Fretting about the “absolute truth” of exactly how Gore groped, or left fluids upon, or sexually battered, or attempted to rape the victim... seems like a misguided use of time for a conservative.
Why? Because even after he’s convicted, I could claim, and you might agree, that we’ll never know the “absolute truth” of what happened in that hotel room.
A hotel employee on the cover of a national publication with a 76-page police report and a pair of stained pants headed for DNA testing is good enough for me.
It sounds almost like you’d need videotape of the attack before you’d consider calling him a pervert. I don’t have video. And if I did, Gore would just claim it’s been forged by digital animation.
Read my post again, please. I specified that Rush said this. I was listening when he said it. I’m still not sure what it has to do with anything. Because Rush mocked Gore using his own words against him, that means that Rush believes Gore to be guilty? Is that what is being implied?
Why am I supposed to “lighten up”? The poster of the thread brought this up for discussion. Or is the whole thread a joke? I might could go along with that angle.
Hey “hearts in london - everett,” here’s another doosie for ya.
Watch this video, then tell me: ARE THESE 2 BLACK PANTHERS GUILTY OF VOTER INTIMIDATION?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=pyv&ad=3265020430&kw=black%20panthers
Because AG Holder says they’re not guilty. And the DOJ suddenly dropped the case. Thus, according to the US Government, they’re not guilty.
So by your standard, they’ll NEVER be guilty, since there will never be a formal prosecution in the United States.
Thus, anyone who says these 2 black panthers “intimidated voters” is committing SLANDER. And anyone who writes such is committing LIBEL.
By your standard.
/noobie out.
Nope, I don’t require a video. Testimony under oath that leads to a conviction by a jury of his peers would do it for me.
The 2 black panthers with the billy club calling whites “cracker” appreciate your reluctance to “accuse them before the courts have spoken.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.