1 posted on
06/26/2010 3:50:11 PM PDT by
Schnucki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Schnucki
1. Further confirmation that he did vote for BO.
2. Further proof they were stupid to have the interview in the first place.
2 posted on
06/26/2010 3:51:59 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Schnucki
That's interesting.
Is there a possibility that Mcchrystal can sue ROLLING STONE -- perhaps bankrupting them???
To: Schnucki
Mccrystal wanted this to come out.
To: Schnucki
Is anyone truly surprised?
6 posted on
06/26/2010 3:59:25 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: Schnucki
A pox on all their houses, McChrystal, Rolling Stone and Obama.
7 posted on
06/26/2010 3:59:34 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: Schnucki
So, Rolling Stone F’d Obama?
How ironic...
Now “The One!” is forced to turn to Bush’s Lib-hated General to pull his a** out of the fire.
That’s just GOT to be sending the hate-filled leftists in to orbit.
8 posted on
06/26/2010 4:02:43 PM PDT by
tcrlaf
(Obama White House=Tammany Hall on the National Mall)
To: Schnucki
The RS did the troops a favor by dumping this Wesley Clark clone.
Pray for America and Our Troops
9 posted on
06/26/2010 4:03:29 PM PDT by
bray
(Did Rush say Complete Failure?)
To: Schnucki
Here are the rules.
There are no rules . If they have been given sensitive information prosecute the lame who gave it to them .
11 posted on
06/26/2010 4:10:38 PM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
To: Schnucki
“You f#cked up, you trusted us.”
13 posted on
06/26/2010 4:17:44 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: Schnucki
I say mind-boggling because if McChrystals staff had come out with this in the first few hours of the furore on Tuesday morning then the entire narrative of the week would have changed and the general might very well still be in his job today.
Yeah right--insults off the record don't matter
And BTW I think the American public has a right to know what the military from the generals down to the Pfcs think about those that send them to war
14 posted on
06/26/2010 4:24:25 PM PDT by
uncbob
To: Schnucki
Reporters want a scoop. Noone should ever tell a reporter anything they don’t want seen in the paper the next day.
To: Schnucki
So, his mistake is he expected a snake not to act like a snake. Fatal error.
17 posted on
06/26/2010 4:37:40 PM PDT by
JimSEA
To: Schnucki
I think this was McChrystal’s way of getting out of Afghanistan, where Obama’s rules of engagement make our military presence a losing proposition.
19 posted on
06/26/2010 4:38:05 PM PDT by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: Schnucki
I find it highly interesting that a soldier with the bonafides of McChrystal would be so naive about a left-wing rag such as Rollingstoned. Rollingstoned has been out to get the military since its inception. They are undoubtedly anti anything the military does and for that matter anything that is not extremely leftist oriented. Their views of capitalism assuredly match the views of The Nation and all the other extreme leftist nutty rags. Why the general thought he could trust the leftist nutjobs at RS is unfathomable.
20 posted on
06/26/2010 4:39:18 PM PDT by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Schnucki
If they didnt, think about what this means: the Obama administration accepts the word of a counter-culture magazine and doesnt even bother to check with the four-star general commanding 100,000 troops in wartime whose career the magazine is seeking to destroy.With this President, it wouldn't surprise me ONE bit!
21 posted on
06/26/2010 4:41:19 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: Schnucki
Sorry if I offend, but McChrystal is a dipsh*t.
He voted for Obama, poured out his heart to Rolling Stone, and believed he would get favorable treatment from them?
Good Lord, if we have people this naive running the show in Afghanistan, we are doomed.
28 posted on
06/26/2010 5:14:19 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: Schnucki
If they didnt, think about what this means: the Obama administration accepts the word of a counter-culture magazine
The last time Rolling Stone could have been called a "counter-culture" magazine was sometime in the early '70s. It's very much a mainstream liberal establishment rag now, and it's aims are shared with all the others - and that is to bring about an American retreat from Afghanistan.
On the record or off, McChrystal's people were big-mouthed fools.
To: Schnucki
I’ve heard so many commentators wonder about why the General allowed this guy around him and didn’t realize that he was a leftist who would sand bag him.
If McCrystal is a social liberal as everyone says, he probably thought that gave him some sort of immunity from attach by the left.
Stanley, Mon General, they eat their own all the time if it fits into their worldview and political program.
43 posted on
06/26/2010 7:34:54 PM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: Schnucki
Too late now , uindeer the bus he goes. This is abhorrent; but my major question is why o why would the CO take an interview from a bunch of leftie dopers in the first place?
45 posted on
06/28/2010 6:40:44 AM PDT by
Karliner
("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."DDE)
To: Schnucki
Too late now , uindeer the bus he goes. This is abhorrent; but my major question is why o why would the CO take an interview from a bunch of leftie dopers in the first place?
46 posted on
06/28/2010 6:40:56 AM PDT by
Karliner
("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."DDE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson