Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Law To Ban Consumption of Alcohol in All Bars and Restaurants?
Amerisrael ^

Posted on 06/14/2010 5:24:32 PM PDT by Amerisrael

Poison Why not?

The arguments presented in favor of the law that now bans smoking in all bars and restaurants in Va. was that smoking poses a serious health danger to the public.

Separate designated non-smoking areas wasn't sufficient the proponents argued, because second-hand smoke also poses a danger.

As it stands now, the only bars or restaurants in Va. that can legally accommodate patrons who wish to smoke are those that have totally closed-off, separate areas, with there own ventilation system. Or, if they are private and not open to the general public. 

Can the case be made that the consumption of alcoholic beverages also poses a serious health danger to the public? That's a no-brainer.

For those who supported the anti-smoking ban in Va, or currently support such legislation in other states citing a "serious health danger" to the public, if you would not also support a ban on consumption of alcoholic beverages in bars and restaurants as a "serious health danger" to the public, there is only one word for that--hypocrisy.  

Does the consumption of alcoholic bevarages in bars and restaurants pose a "serious health danger" to the public?

Again, that's a no-brainer.

"More Alcohol Sales Sites Mean More Neighborhood Violence"-Science Daily.

Bars and Violence:

"The link between bars and violence has been recognized over time and across cultures-the classic 'bar room brawl' is commonly depicted in popular culture, and all too often we hear about people being injured, killed, or sexually assaulted in relation to licensed establishments..." read it all

(Excerpt) Read more at amerisrael.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: alcohol; bars; blogpimp; health; law; lping; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2010 5:24:32 PM PDT by Amerisrael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

That “not open to the public” thing sounds like the perfect loophole. Charge $1 for one-day membership to The Club. New members automatically get $1 off of their first order.


2 posted on 06/14/2010 5:28:42 PM PDT by Rio (Fix the leak, Daddy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

Rolling eyes.

Nicotine addicts seem to forget that a person smoking cigarettes also causes the person next to them to inhale carcinogenic smoke.

If a person drinks alcohol, the person sitting next to them is not ingesting said alcohol.


3 posted on 06/14/2010 5:32:40 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

Bring back Speakeasies?


4 posted on 06/14/2010 5:33:51 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

That’s actually what private club laws usually are.

In our city most bars are private clubs because doing so allows them to get around the state law that says that bars have to close at 2am on Sundays. We’re one of only a few cities where bars stay open until the last patron leaves and that’s cause the overwhelming majority are these little clubs where you fill out a little piece of paper that they shred the next day to get in.


5 posted on 06/14/2010 5:33:53 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Reddy

Cars are much worse.


7 posted on 06/14/2010 5:35:59 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael

Smoking has been a pretty easy mark. Most people who don’t smoke have been oblivious to implications and precedent of the strident anti-smoking movement. Now we have to wait and see what is targeted next.


8 posted on 06/14/2010 5:37:22 PM PDT by RepublicanMeansAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

“Cars are much worse.”

Hope you are not running a car in an enclosed building.


9 posted on 06/14/2010 5:38:44 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael
What's the point of having a bar then?

"Dude, let's do shots of Mountain Dew! Get really wasted!"

10 posted on 06/14/2010 5:39:39 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
If a person drinks alcohol, the person sitting next to them is not ingesting said alcohol.

They can measure your BAC by a breath test, because when you've been drinking there's alcohol on your breath. If you're breating in out, the person next to you is breating it in, just like the tobacco smoke. Alcohol doesn't have to be ingested, it'll go directly into your bloodstream through your nose, lungs, or any mucous membrane.

Apply the same "if a whole bunch is bad, then any is too much" formulat to that.

11 posted on 06/14/2010 5:40:06 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
People driving cars usually forget they are making the person next to the road breathe in carcinogenic smoke.

People relieving their bowels of excess gas usually forget they are making the person across the room breathe in carcinogenic gas.

People .................

The solution ~ dispose of the tattletales!

12 posted on 06/14/2010 5:41:55 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanMeansAmerican
The problem smokers have/had was their habit affected people who did not share their passion for smoke. During the heyday of smoking in restaurants they were very rude when asked not to smoke around my infant son.

A man's rights end where another’s begins. I think had more smokers been mindful of this basic rule the backlash would never have forced the governments hand.

13 posted on 06/14/2010 5:43:15 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Amerisrael; humblegunner

Another vanity from another Blog Pimper. This is getting out of hand.


14 posted on 06/14/2010 5:45:37 PM PDT by GRRRRR (He'll NEVER be my President, FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

The mafia must be low on cash. LOL!


15 posted on 06/14/2010 5:46:20 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Everyone drives a car (at least most of us).

Everyone farts.

Smoking is a choice, one that forces non-smokers to make choices. When you force someone else to make a new choice you have affected them enough to hold a grudge. People do not like having to change their plans based on what they perceive as unhealthful and selfish habits of others. They are far more tolerant of things that we all must endure.


16 posted on 06/14/2010 5:48:01 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I’ve never received a “contact-high” from alcohol but I’m pretty sure I felt something at a ZZ Top concert.


17 posted on 06/14/2010 5:51:48 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
If a person drinks alcohol, the person sitting next to them is not ingesting said alcohol.

Uh wrong...People that drink alcohol develop rhinoceros breath, and I can smell their disgusting alcohol laced breath 5 feet away.

Ban alcohol consumption in public!

18 posted on 06/14/2010 5:52:13 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
I’ve never received a “contact-high” from alcohol but I’m pretty sure I felt something at a ZZ Top concert.

Well, they say alcohol impairs your judgement, so ya kinda have to wonder how you're supposed to know when your drunk.

19 posted on 06/14/2010 5:53:46 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan

You bring up an excellent point about “a man’s rights ending where another’s begins”. Would that not also apply to the bar/restaurant owner deciding what clientele he would like to serve?


20 posted on 06/14/2010 5:54:21 PM PDT by Knightmixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson