Skip to comments.
Kenya colonial birth registration law at time of Obama's birth (document analysis by Lucas Smith)
Youtube: InspectorSmith's Channel ^
| June 1, 2010 (approx.)
| Lucas Smith
Posted on 06/07/2010 8:48:28 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
(Quoting InspectorSmith (Lucas Smith):
Registration of births in Kenya was introduced in 1904 but only applied to Americans and Europeans.
As we can all see now, a HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR BIRTH RECORD WOULD BE ALL THAT A KENYAN BORN IN MOMBASA WOULD HAVE ALL THE WAY UP UNTIL the year 1971.
There is, however, an interesting twist in that while President Barack Obama's father was an African........his (President Barack Obama's) mother was an American.......so......which law was used???
African born in Kenya law??? Or American / European born in Kenya law???
If the African birth law was used then all that there would have ever been is a HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR HOSPITAL RECORD (at least up until 1971, and maybe not even then, I doubt the law was applied retroactively).
If the American / European birth was used then we would have TWO records. A hospital birth certificate and a Protectorate / Colony of Kenya birth registration / birth certificate.
I have also just tonight added this document to my scribd.com account (Patriot1980).
http://www.scribd.com/Patriot1980
"Republic of Kenya. Ministry of State for Immigration and Registration of Persons. Nyayo House. 2006"
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fraud; kenya; lucassmith; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
To: Seizethecarp
Of course, if a sample of Dr. Angawas signature is found for comparison to the signature on the CPGH BC and there is a match, then you and Mik Tearg and the other after-birthers will claim that Smith or his forger had a sample of the signature and forged it on the CPGH BC. I dont think so.....You will have to scrape me off the floor if it is shown that this is a real signature though ,
now what will you do when the handwriting doesnt match?
121
posted on
06/08/2010 7:25:19 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: woofie
“now what will you do when the handwriting doesnt match?”
The best indication that the handwriting actually does match is that no eager, well-funded Obama defense team member (presumably with free access to Kenya to defend Obama) has come forward with any indication or proof that the Ang'awa handwriting doesn't match.
To: Mik Taerg
no more than normal distortions due to photography, scanning, resizing of images, etc.Resizing an image doesn't make the certificate paper grow nor does 'distortion' of image make certificate paper grow. You can physically count the extra bits of pattern repeating in the paper beyond where the edge of the document ends in the scanned image. This can't be explained away through photographic or scanning anomalies.
Again there is only one way out. Fukino has confirmed the document to be what an authentic Hawaiian Colb would look like. Sue her.
This is more nonsense. Fukino has not confirmed anything about what an authentic Hawaiian COLB looks like. You're just making things up now.
If the State of Hawaii will tell me that they have issued a false document, or that they never issued the document, or that birth in OAHU HONOLULU does not match their records, or that Oahu is a convenience birthplace I will become the chief of the birthers.
They have said that Obama's alleged COLB does not match their records. They have been asked point blank if the certificate number on the factlack photos belongs to Obama and they refuse to confirm that it does despite having statutory authority to say yes. They've been asked if records exist that indicate Obama's birth records were amended, and they have indicated that his records have been amended, meaning the COLB should indicate that it is amended. Thus, Obama's alleged COLB does NOT look like what his COLB should look like. They told us that other vital records are needed to 'verify' that Obama was born in Hawaii meaning his COLB does NOT prove he was born in Hawaii (which would be the case for an amended certificate). You should be the biggest birther out there since the evidence is stacked against Obama.
123
posted on
06/08/2010 9:02:43 PM PDT
by
edge919
To: Natural Born 54
Love the troll pic. That is fabulous!
To: Mik Taerg
kimbo, The school he attended in Indonesia was not a “muslim only sharia” school. It was actually a Catholic school that had students from different religions. The school was required to teach islamic law and only Indonesian citizens were allowed to go to school at that time. Barry was adopted and given Indonesian citizenship by his mother’s 2nd husband, Lolo Soetoro. His school registration shows him as, Barry Soetoro, Muslim, Indonesian citizen, father Lolo Sotoero.
To: edge919
Your link to the story about obozo promoting a new constitution was a great find. Thanks. Did you also read the story connected to that page about Joe Biden going to Kenya and the message he took from the white house?
To: theviking711
I haven’t seen it yet. Will take a look.
127
posted on
06/08/2010 11:07:58 PM PDT
by
edge919
To: edge919; theviking711
I read the article, and it mentioned that there is an apparent “rush” to pass this Constitution. The authors ask, what’s the hurry?
Link of the article
contains this link to the draft Constitution (sidebar on the left).
http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/downloads/draft.constitution.pdf
Look at the chapter (Ch. 3, pp. 18-20) on citizenship.
CHAPTER THREE
CITIZENSHIP
Entitlements of citizens
12.
(1) Every citizen is entitled to
(a) the rights, privileges and benefits of citizenship, subject to the limits provided or permitted by this Constitution; and
(b) a Kenyan passport and any document of registration or identification issued by the State to citizens.
(2) A passport or other document referred to in clause (1) (b) may be denied, suspended or confiscated only in accordance with an Act of Parliament that satisfies the criteria referred to in Article 24.
Retention and acquisition of citizenship
13.
(1) Every person who was a citizen immediately before the effective date retains the same citizenship status as of that date.
(2) Citizenship may be acquired by birth or registration.
(3) Citizenship is not lost through marriage or the dissolution of marriage.
Citizenship by birth
14.
(1) A person is a citizen by birth if on the day of the persons birth, whether or not the person is born in Kenya, either the mother or father of the person is a citizen.
(2) Clause (1) applies equally to a person born before the effective date, whether or not the person was born in Kenya, if either the mother or father of the person is or was a citizen.
(3) Parliament may enact legislation limiting the effect of clauses (1) and (2) on the descendents of Kenyan citizens who are born outside Kenya.
(4) A child found in Kenya who is, or appears to be, less than eight years of age, and whose nationality and parents are not known, is presumed to be a citizen by birth.
(5) A person who is a Kenyan citizen by birth and who has ceased to be a Kenyan citizen because the person acquired citizenship of another country, is entitled on application to regain Kenyan citizenship.
Citizenship by registration
15.
(1) A person who has been married to a citizen for a period of at least seven years is entitled on application to be registered as a citizen.
(2) A person who has been lawfully resident in Kenya for a continuous period of at least seven years, and who satisfies the conditions prescribed by an Act of Parliament, may apply to be registered as a citizen.
(3) A child who is not a citizen, but is adopted by a citizen, is entitled on application to be registered as a citizen.
(4) Parliament shall enact legislation establishing conditions on which citizenship may be granted to individuals who are citizens of other countries.
(5) This Article applies to a person as from the effective date, but any requirements that must be satisfied before the person is entitled to be registered as a citizen shall be regarded as having been satisfied irrespective of whether the person satisfied them before or after the effective date, or partially before, and partially after, the effective date.
Dual citizenship
16. A citizen by birth does not lose citizenship by acquiring the citizenship of another country.
Revocation of citizenship
17.
(1) If a person acquired citizenship by registration, the citizenship may be revoked if
(a) the person acquired the citizenship by fraud, false representation or concealment of any material fact;
(b) the person has, during any war in which Kenya was engaged, unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy or been engaged in or associated with any business that was knowingly carried on in such a manner as to assist an enemy in that war;
(c) the person has, within five years after registration, been convicted of an offence and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three years or longer; or
(d) the person has, at any time after registration, been convicted of treason, or of an offence for which
(i) a penalty of at least seven years imprisonment may be imposed; or
(ii) a more severe penalty may be imposed.
(2) The citizenship of a person who was presumed to be a citizen by birth, as contemplated in Article 14 (4), may be revoked if
(a) the citizenship was acquired by fraud, false representation or concealment of any material fact by any person;
(b) the nationality or parentage of the person becomes known, and reveals that the person was a citizen of another country; or
(c) the age of the person becomes known, and reveals that the person was older than eight years when found in Kenya.
Legislation on citizenship
18.
Parliament shall enact legislation
(a) prescribing procedures by which a person may become a citizen;
(b) governing entry into and residence in Kenya;
(c) providing for the status of permanent residents;
(d) providing for voluntary renunciation of citizenship;
(e) prescribing procedures for revocation of citizenship;
(f) prescribing the duties and rights of citizens; and
(g) generally giving effect to the provisions of this Chapter.
To: thecodont
That is part of the Constitution that Obama is pushing on Kenya? It looks like Obama is setting up his escape if he needs it.
To: thecodont
Obama is making plans to repatriate himself to the country where he belongs. From the Kenyan Parliament minutes in April of this year.
To: edge919
The COLB?
Kenyan official: Obama born here, not even a native American.
During debate over the draft of a new Kenyan constitution, James Orengo, the country’s minister of lands and a member of parliament for the Ugenya constituency, cited America’s election of a Kenyan-born president as an example of what can be accomplished when diverse peoples unite:
The Kenyan lawmaker told the nation’s parliament last month that Barack Obama was born in Africa and is therefore “not even a native American.”
The full quote; “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion. What has killed us here is exclusion; that once Mr. Orengo is President, I know of no other place than Ugenya. That is why we were fighting against these many Presidencies in the past. I hope that Kenya will come of age. This country must come of age. People want freedom and nations want liberation, but countries want independence.”
http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/tenth_forth_sess/Hansard/RDRAFT25.03P.pdf
UPDATE: The Kenyan Government is scrubbing this document. I have uploaded it here LINK
The statement is on page 31 of the PDF document. Also when did the United States do away with exclusion? What exclusion? The Natural Born Citizen clause? When was this done?
So who is James Orengo?
James Orengo, (James Jimmy-Jimmy Owadgi Adhiambo Orengo) is a lawyer and former presidential candidate in Kenya. Orengo has since been sworn in as a Minister for Lands in the new Coalition Government formed by the National Accord Act of 2008. As of 2007 he is still the SDP chairman. The party supported Raila Odinga of Orange Democratic Movement at the 2007 general elections. Raila Odinga is the first cousin of Barack Obama.
Additional information and previous posts of Kenyan officials stating Obama is Kenyan
Kenyan Parliament says Obama is Kenyan after the 2008 election
Kenyan Historian says Obama is Kenyan
Michelle Obama syas Kenya is Obama’s ‘HOME COUNTRY’
Prove it to yourself So easy ANYONE can do it (down about 40 percent of the page linked here)
Posted on December 2, 2009 by nobarack08
So easy ANYONE can do it
For over 15 months I have been stating that the Obama COLB posted on Fight the Smears and FactCheck are forgeries. The Obama supporters have attempted to ridicule and misrepresent the facts, of those who question the validity of a single document, the Certification of Live Birth posted on Fight the Smears and FactCheck.
Here lies the challenge to everyone that wants to see for themselves, by their own hand evidence of document forgery.
Here are the files that you will need, please note that these image are HIGH Resolution images with the exception of the FTS one, all the others are large images.
COLB #2 without SEAL
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg
size 2304 x 3072
Date Signature
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_9.jpg
size 3072 x 2304
Raised seal
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_1.jpg
size 2304 x 3072
Veritcal #3 with SEAL
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
2304 x 3072
COLB #3 in its side
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_2.jpg
size 3072 x 2304
FTS
http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg
size 585 x 575
DailyKos
http://palabre.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/bo_birth_certificate-kos.jpg
size 2427 x 2369
All you need to do is the following;
- Download the files and save to your hard drive.
- Browse to the folder that you saved the files to.
- Right click on the file and in the menu select Open with and choose Paint
- This will open the selected file in Microsoft Paint.
- You dont have to resize the image, as it would be better if you viewed if full size.
- With the image opened, you have 2 options. Go to the Menu bar and select Image and then Invert colors or use the Ctrl + I keys.
- Save that file as xxxxInv, where xxx is the original file name and INV stands for Inverted.
- Now compare the images.
- Note the following;
- 28.jpg has no SEAL applied to it
- birth_certificate_1.jpg shows CLEAR indications of an embossed SEAL.
- birth_certificate_2.jpg shows CLEAR indications of an embossed SEAL.
- birth_certificate_3.jpg shows NO indications of an any line breakage and paper perforation by anything let alone an embossed SEAL.
- birth_certificate_5.jpg shows CLEAR indications of an embossed SEAL.
- birth_certificate_9.jpg is the
- bo_birth_certificate-kos.jpg shows NO indications of an any line breakage and paper perforation by anything let alone an embossed SEAL.
There you have your evidence, three different COLB posted. Using only your operating system, and a very simple graphics program with nothing else you have been able see with your own eyes the evidence of document forgery. Without having to adjust the brightness or contrast, hue and saturation, you can plainly see the evidence. How can indentations and perforations be clearly seen on one image and totally absent the next?
Filed under: Barack, Politics, illegal alien | Tagged: Barack, Forgery, Obama | 6 Comments »
Posted on December 8, 2009 by nobarack08
In an ongoing effort to educate those about the COLB fogery. I have been holding some cards back. Now it’s time to ”Cry Havoc! And slip the dogs of war”.
There are those that claim, that the COLB off “FTS’ Fight the Smears is scanned and therefore defects and other items are not going to be picked up. Or that the high resolution images off FactCheck are just as deceptive. Well lets take a look at these. First off the image off The DailyKos is (w) 2427 x (h) 2369 to compare this to the average users desktop which currently is (w) 1280 x (h) 1024 – hence this document the DailyKos posted is over two (2) times the size, the even higher resolution images off FactCheck come in at a whopping (w) 2304 x (h) 3072 or close to three (3) times the size of the standard desktop resolution, some of the FactCheck images are rotated to the side and therefore some are (w) 3072 x (h) 2304 respectfully.
There is a filter that can be applied to digital images called Statistical Image Enhancement [We will refer to this as SEI]. Which is defined as ‘The present invention relates to image enhancement by exploiting statistical properties of reference images. In particular, images may be sharpened by reconstructing missing frequency components in accordance with statistical constraints that are determined from higher order statistical properties of a reference image that corresponds to the difference of the original image and a lowpass filtered version thereof. This form of statistical image enhancement may also be applied to image and video coding in order to achieve superior image qualities at higher compression gains by transmitting statistical properties of the coding error together with the encoded images.’
Digital enhancement is routinely done in the field of astronomy. With the advent of CCD imaging, and software that allows even the basic amateur astronomers, to capture and enhance images caputred in with the basic of telescopes. Go to the Meade Telescope web-site and browse through the gallery section, or a simple google search of the same. Here is a good resource, http://www.willbell.com/aip/index.htm
Now this leads us to the images posted on the internet refered to the the previous “Prove it to yourself So easy ANYONE can do it” Some comments that I recieved complained that MS Paints is to basic a program, that is the point, without any special software, it is possible to detect the forgery. Now let’s move on to further establish the forgery is self-evident.
There is a nifty freeware program called ‘Image Analyzer’. This program will be a treat for most computer users as it can manipulate pictures from the net or digital cameras.
Now we are going to take the next stair up the forgery staircase. If you have downloaded and kept the images off the original “Prove it to yourself So easy ANYONE can do it” you can use the same ones for this exercise. Off my blog are some additional images. Download the following images. The Decosta Birth Certificate, The Tomoyasu Birth Certificate, The Covered 1990 Certificate, The Edith Rear images. Then after installing Image Analyzer, open the individual images and then go to the menu bar and select the ‘Operations’ – ‘Color Correction’ – ‘Statistical image enhancement…’ option, a pop-up will appear with the mathematical equation and the default entry of 0.5. You can change this or keep it and then click on ‘OK’, at this point the process will begin and depending on the size of the image, your compter’s processing power it might be a few seconds to even a minute.
Notice that in the above images and the original ones in the previous exercise, you can clearly see the indications of the SEAL being applied to the certificates and certifications with the exceptions of FactCheck #2. WHY? Is this not supposed to be the same document as the DailyKos document (which again, HAS NO SEAL, but that was apparently scanned), or ‘FTS’ Fight the Smears (again another scanned image that has no SEAL), or the FactCheck #3 that clearly shows an embossed SEAL (but not the type defined by the State of Hawaii), so how does FactCheck #2 account for it’s existence?
Here is an original Hawaiian Certification and the SEI version;
Even this one that is NOT scanned shows evidence of the embossed SEAL.
So why doesn’t the following images show any evidence of an embossed SEAL?
FTS – Fight The Smears
The DailyKos supposed scanned imaged [resized from the original]
Or FactCheck #2
So in reality we are not talking about ONE image or document that does not contain the SEAL, we are talking about the DailyKos image that was posted in mid-June 2008 [that is a high resolution image], the FTS image posted in Aug 2008 and the FactCheck # 2 document [another high resolution] image posted after that. Now, just to be fair, here is the FactCheck #3 that does show embossing of a non-State of Hawaii issued SEAL applied. [Image resized, and area enlarged to see embossing visible]
Now I would like to remind you what the State of Hawaii has stated.
The SEAL is applied by machine and there is lettering, that lettering being “Department of Health” and “State of Hawaii”. So how does the Seal disappear and reappear and disappear off the same document?
Part 3 will also explore another aspect of digital enhancement.
“Cry Havoc! And slip the dogs of war”.
Filed under: Barack, Obama, Politics, illegal alien | Tagged: alien, Barack, Birth Certificate, Forgery, Founding Fathers, Fraud, Illegal, un-Natural Born, undocumented | 4 Comments »
Posted on December 13, 2009 by nobarack08
In the first and second part of this series, we have looked at the forged COLB as presented and shown the irregularities between an actual one issued by the State of Hawaii and the ones presented by TheDailyKos, Fight the Smears [FTS], and FactCheck. Now for the blank template itself and the simple question. How or why would a blank ‘Certification of Live Birth’ be showing any indications of a SEAL present on it. Here is the original Blank Hawaiian template that has been circulating on the internet. Notice that the blanked out certificate number is identical to the one posted on FTS. The process for the issuance of a Birth Certificare or Certification of Live Birth, is that the data is printed out on via a printer, the information checked and verified and then a Seal from the issuing authority and signiture is applied. So the question remains, how does a blank certification of live birth exist with anomolies exist. Here is a Hawaiian Blank Template with filters applied to bring out the anomolies in the area where an embossed seal is normally applied and the date stamp. Note this is also the same date that appears on the Obama COLB. Here is the Hawaiian Blank COLB. Note that the Certificate number is blacked out and the date stamp is visible Jun 6 2007. I recieved several comments that asked me to post the Hawaiian Blank template.
Here are three different images showing the anomalies in the area that a SEAL would be applied. All on the blank template.
Now we look at an what an Obama supporter claims as false representation on the FactCheck image.
To quote his lies; “Now a real expert, or even just a person of reasonable common sense, would chalk this up to factors like how the photo isn’t in focus, making it difficult to see a pressure seal, or how it might be obscured somewhat by the shadow. Here, for instance, is how one portion of this JPEG looks, without any modification”
The is attempting to take a portion, at the furthest point of the image and state that, ‘that area represents the entire image’. Here is another image of the FactCheck forged document.
Here is the comparison in relation to his section.
An Obot lawyer, who is too stupid and arrogant to realize that the image above, has been resized, by this blog hosting. Has decided to post a comparison image. The image below demonstrates that the FactCheck people used to verify the COLB were not only inexperienced, but were deceptive as well. They were not qualified to even photograph the document and took every effort to decieve anyone looking at it, just like the questionalbe lawyer. Regardless of the level of focus that the deranged lawyer is pawning, there are no defects from the embossing that are visible in other images. Since he can’t explain that away, he’s throwing a temper tantrum.
UPDATE 12/24/2009 As I have posted a new post today I am inserting the origional image that was to go here. Here is the one that I changed from to keep the Obot’s off-guard. The original was to have stated ‘Some degree of being in focus’ and an cropped section showing that even the date was visible.
Now even with the image above, there is no indication of anything in the area where there should be.
Now here is where is mis-representing the facts. He is openly pawning the DailyKos image as proof that there is a seal and that makes it legit. Now to destroy all myths about the Obama COLB being a legitimate State issued Certification of Live Birth.
Here is an inverted image of the DailyKos COLB. There are defects that indicate in the area [region] of where a seal should be that there are something a miss. He attempted to use ‘Edge Detection’ as a means of bringing out the edges of the breakage from the embossing. I will his own image and prove him wrong. Here is the image that he has posted ‘claiming that a seal is present.’ Note the indications of a supposed seal and date stamp with the first four images above, they are identical.
The original sixe of the DailyKos image was 2427 x 2369 – 16 million colors, over 17 megs in size.
The silver stake in the forgery that we are gong to expose is that the ‘Date Stamp’ is actually a layer superimposed on the image and is not actuall a stamp as indicated by the State of Hawaii.
Here is a crop of the image posted on the debuker’s web-site.
Notice the lines under the date stamp [here the date is reversed, as the stamp is supposed to be applied to the back of the document.] There is no indication that any of the lines under the date stamp have been altered by the application of the stamp. Now let’s look the same area on the Hawaiian Blank template. Also note that where there is supposed to be an ‘embossed seal’ shows the same anomolies as in the Blank Hawaiian Template also.
Lets invert the DailyKos crop again and see the entire crop area.
Now for a close-up of just the ‘Date Stamp’ area
Now compare the above to the Obama COLB Date Stamp region [below] and see if you can see any line breakage from a stamp being applied to the document. Notice the ‘bleed-through’ of the date stamp being aver-layed on top of the image versus being applied to the back.
The Date Stamp was applied as a layer to the Blank Hawaiian Template and they used that image to create the Barack Obama DailyKos COLB, that image was used again on Fight the Smears ‘FTS’ website.
As even State of Hawaii’s Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, stated “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”
The same anomolies and marking across the ‘Blank Hawaiian Template’, The DailyKos image, indicating that the same image was used to create them. That the indications that they claim are an embossed seal and date stamp are nothing more then a layer applied to the image to make it appear that it was real.
There has been no proof that the signiture that FactCheck posted was even on the Obama COLB. Bottom line, the Blank Hawaiian template was used to create the DailyKos image and that it was never issued by the State of Hawaii. The FactCheck forgery used a non-State of Hawaii SEAL as indicated by the following e-mail.
You want to see the "REAL" "CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH"?
Just click on them for the source information.
Didn't our Heavenly Father, through our Savior tell us...
" thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother."
How well we deserve this curse (~so shall the LORD bring upon you all evil things~) God has given us,
through the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF, the FASCIST Obama.
Someone once ask, "When is violence for political purposes justified?"...
Thomas Jefferson once said that, "When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
So, in light of the minor outbreaks of violence we've been seeing lately, I ask We have a second amendment to help protect us from the government, when is it acceptable to take up arms?
At what point does violence become the correct response?
I recommend the following for your valuable time, to ponder... (all 37 pages)
Violence, Nonviolence, and the American Revolution
All things written in the Bible must come to pass,
and we WILL get to the day worse than has ever been.
And this too shall pass...
They hate him that rebuketh in the gate, and they abhor him that speaketh uprightly.
Forasmuch therefore as your treading is upon the poor,
and ye take from him burdens of wheat: ye have built houses of hewn stone, but ye shall not dwell in them;
ye have planted pleasant vineyards, but ye shall not drink wine of them.
For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.
Can you remember reading about "a thorn in their side"?
"But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes,
and thorns in your sides,
and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.
Moreover it shall come to pass, that I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them."
The command I await is...
"Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them".
Obama, and his Marxist minions, SHALL be gathered and bound.
131
posted on
06/09/2010 12:40:15 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Red Steel
That’s not what that says. What that is, is an irritated member of Parliament asking why his countryman Barry isn’t paying taxes to Kenya on his book royalties.
132
posted on
06/09/2010 1:16:52 AM PDT
by
Plummz
(pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
To: Plummz
Yeah they want tribute alright. But it does say this:
The biggest artifact in the USA today that belongs to this country is one Barack Obama. How does he intend to repatriate himself OR....
- - - - - -
Main Entry: re·pa·tri·ate
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)rē-ˈpā-trē-ˌāt, -ˈpa-\
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): re·pa·tri·at·ed; re·pa·tri·at·ing
Etymology: Late Latin
repatriatus, past participle of
repatriare to go home again more at
repair
Date: 1611
: to restore or return to the country of origin, allegiance, or citizenship <repatriate prisoners of war>
re·pa·tri·ate \-trē-ət, -trē-ˌāt\ noun
re·pa·tri·a·tion \(ˌ)rē-ˌpā-trē-ˈā-shən, -ˌpa-\ noun
To: Plummz
Here's another one for you with completely unambiguous words from the minutes of the Kenyan Parliament session.
The girl Obama is a Kenyan.
To: Seizethecarp
Straight up.
If Obama KNOWS he was born in Kenya, then he KNOWS he is not a “natural born citizen”.
And that would be treason.
135
posted on
06/09/2010 2:49:03 AM PDT
by
djf
To: Yosemitest
Very nice and fancy presentation. I see two identical date stamps, don’t really know what that means however ?
Could please make a 100 words resume for the simpletons like me ?
To: djf
If Obama KNOWS he was born in Kenya, then he KNOWS he is not a natural born citizen.
Very true.
What if Obama was born in Kenya and he doesn’t know ?
I mean what if his parents lied to him and he is actually a victim of this situation ? How should we feel for him ?
To: Red Steel
Yeah, and it’s clear from the context the MP is most concerned about repatriating those book funds. It’s not a reference to a secret plan Barry has to run away to Kenya.
138
posted on
06/09/2010 8:02:16 AM PDT
by
Plummz
(pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
To: Mik Taerg
"I see two identical date stamps, (and I) dont really know what that means however?"
(This is referring to post #131.) I ASSUME you're talking about this:
The silver stake in the forgery that we are gong to expose is that the Date Stamp is actually a layer SUPERIMPOSED on the imageand is not actually a stamp as indicated by the State of Hawaii.
Here is a crop of the image posted on the debukers web-site.
Notice the lines under the date stamp [here the date is reversed, as the stamp is supposed to be applied to the back of the document.]
There is no indication that any of the lines under the date stamp
have been altered by the application of the stamp.
Now lets look the same area on the Hawaiian Blank template.
Also note that where there is supposed to be an embossed seal shows the same anomolies as in the Blank Hawaiian Template also.
Lets invert the DailyKos crop again and see the entire crop area.
Now for a close-up of just the Date Stamp area.
Now compare the above to the Obama COLB Date Stamp region [below]
and see if you can see any line breakage from a stamp being applied to the document.
Notice the bleed-through of the date stamp being aver-layed on top of the image versus being applied to the back.
The Date Stamp was applied as a layer to the Blank Hawaiian Template
and they used that image to create the Barack Obama DailyKos COLB, that image was used again on Fight the Smears FTS website.
As even State of Hawaiis Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, stated I dont know that its possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.
The same anomolies and marking across the Blank Hawaiian Template, The DailyKos image, indicating that the same image was used to create them.
That the indications that they claim are an embossed seal and date stamp are nothing more then a layer applied to the image to make it appear that it was real.
There has been NO PROOF that the signiture that FactCheck posted was even on the Obama COLB.
Bottom line, the Blank Hawaiian template was used to create the DailyKos image and that it was never ISSUED by the State of Hawaii.
The FactCheck FORGERY used a NON-State of Hawaii SEAL as indicated by the following e-mail.
Does that RE-FORMATING help?
To try to condense this into 100 words or less, would take out the detailed analysisneeded to debunk this lie.
The American Public
ISN'T as stupid as the "Lame-Stream-Media" would have
you ... believe.
139
posted on
06/09/2010 10:48:58 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Mik Taerg
"How should we feel for him?"
You've GOT ... to be joking!
FEELINGS ... are a LIBERAL DISTRACTION.
We're into THINKING!!!
FASCIST Obama should be DEPORTED, plain and simple.
We should confiscate everything he has.
And we should send him back to Kenya, flat broke, with NO retirement at all.
140
posted on
06/09/2010 10:55:53 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson