Posted on 06/07/2010 8:48:28 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
(Quoting InspectorSmith (Lucas Smith):
Registration of births in Kenya was introduced in 1904 but only applied to Americans and Europeans.
As we can all see now, a HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR BIRTH RECORD WOULD BE ALL THAT A KENYAN BORN IN MOMBASA WOULD HAVE ALL THE WAY UP UNTIL the year 1971.
There is, however, an interesting twist in that while President Barack Obama's father was an African........his (President Barack Obama's) mother was an American.......so......which law was used???
African born in Kenya law??? Or American / European born in Kenya law???
If the African birth law was used then all that there would have ever been is a HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR HOSPITAL RECORD (at least up until 1971, and maybe not even then, I doubt the law was applied retroactively).
If the American / European birth was used then we would have TWO records. A hospital birth certificate and a Protectorate / Colony of Kenya birth registration / birth certificate.
I have also just tonight added this document to my scribd.com account (Patriot1980).
http://www.scribd.com/Patriot1980
"Republic of Kenya. Ministry of State for Immigration and Registration of Persons. Nyayo House. 2006"
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
have you read the link provided ? have you done some search ?
do you know what you are talking about ?
NO ONE HAS DOUBTS HE WENT TO KINDERGARTEN IN HAWAII. some believe he was enrolled as a foreigner and that is why they want to see his kindergarten records.
plus I like all those Caucasians, native Hawaiians and ethnic Japanese in a Muslim Only Sharia Indonesian Kindergarten
And so far, nothing disproves that Obama could have been an Indonesian or Kenyan citizen when he attended kindergarten.
It doesn’t match with what exactly ?
the different position ?
the apparently different character ?
do you realized these are hand set stamps ?
I would be more suspicious had they been in the exact same position
Ummmm ... this is supposed to be from the same document. Why wouldn't it be in the exact same position?? You're helping prove my point. The document in the factlack photos do not match the document scanned and posted by Obama (or his forger) at FTS. One or both documents are fraudulent.
“And so far, nothing disproves that Obama could have been an Indonesian or Kenyan citizen when he attended kindergarten.”
could be. Allmost certainly he held dual citizenship. Still according to the COLB he is American by birthright. Nothing indicates he renounced his citizenship at 18.
If you have issues you should contact Orly Taitz and have her sue the State of Hawaii. Courts can resolve this.
The alleged COLB has not been proven to be genuine. We don't know if he was born in Hawaii yet. If he was, he has citizenship by Constitutional mandate, not by birthright. Birthright would only apply if his father was a U.S. citizen, which Barak Sr. was not. As far as renouncing his citizenship, which one?? There's no evidence he renounced his British or Kenyan citizenship, so what's your point??
If you have issues you should contact Orly Taitz and have her sue the State of Hawaii. Courts can resolve this.
What makes you think Orly would sue the state of Hawaii??
The document in the factlack photos do not match the document scanned and posted by Obama (or his forger) at FTS. One or both documents are fraudulent.
The document posted at FTS shows the front only. Polland then made a hard effort to read-through the position of the date on the back side and compare the position to the one found on the COLB. Polland has manipulated data all the way and if you reherse his analysis you will find out quite easily that his repositiong is a t best arbitrarym I would call it outright internet fraud.
Is that the best response you can come up with? Sheesh..
“What makes you think Orly would sue the state of Hawaii??”
Nothing absolutely nothing. I am allmost certain she won’t. Orly has interest in keeping this legend alive, suing Hawaii would be a suicide.
“If you have issues you should contact Orly Taitz and have her sue the State of Hawaii. Courts can resolve this.
Is that the best response you can come up with? Sheesh”
And it is the best possible response after years of ranting. This is the only way out unless your agenda is purely political: KEEP THIS URBAN LEGEND ALIVE, tackle all the frivulous aspects and never go to the core of the problem: IS THE HAWAIIAN DOCUMENT AUTHENTIC ?
There's a baseless and pointless speculative statement.
What years of ranting?? The BC issue is still less than two years old, although Obama’s second birther day is coming up this Saturday.
Some of the items the resident troll is requesting or asking questions about or making false statements about can be found here:
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm
No one could remember all the facts and lies pertaining to BHO, nor have all the available documents and photos at the ready for one of these discussions. There are people here who are very well informed on some aspects of the background but not on all aspects.
The whole tale is enough to make anyone’s head spin. Beckwith’s ObamaFile is therefore a good ready reference. He’s done an amazing job of collecting and organizing all things Obama. Saves time looking through hundreds of bookmarks, too.
“This has nothing to do with Polland. You can visually inspect the factlack photos and the FTS scans or the Politifacts scans and see that the date stamp number 6 does not match in shape. There’s also a major discrepancy in the document itself. Somehow the document photographed by factlack is printed on security paper that is bigger than the document scanned at FTS. Certificate paper doesn’t grow. You can see where the paper edge of the scanned COLB stops in the inset below.”
no more than normal distortions due to photography, scanning, resizing of images, etc.
Again there is only one way out. Fukino has confirmed the document to be what an authentic Hawaiian Colb would look like. Sue her.
If the State of Hawaii will tell me that they have issued a false document, or that they never issued the document, or that birth in OAHU HONOLULU does not match their records, or that Oahu is a convenience birthplace I will become the chief of the birthers.
And it is the best possible response after years of ranting. This is the only way out unless your agenda is purely political: KEEP THIS URBAN LEGEND ALIVE, tackle all the frivulous aspects and never go to the core of the problem: IS THE HAWAIIAN DOCUMENT AUTHENTIC ?
What grounds are you going to sue them on? What is your standing? Do you think for one second you will get to do discovery in a Hawaiian Court?
What is your purpose here besides attacing Lucas?
Watch for “Blue Hawaii caught red-handed” coming to a thread near you later this week, Mik Taerg, Chief of Birthers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.