Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there anyway that Sarah Palin isn't the Republican nominee in 2012? (From a Leftist Blogger)
Open Left ^ | Wednesday April 7, 2010 | Chris Bowers

Posted on 04/07/2010 5:38:19 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 next last
To: Arguendo

Are you claiming that you haven’t had more accounts than those two?


201 posted on 04/08/2010 8:58:32 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Your evasion is duly noted.

When the candidates declare and I choose whom to back my reasons will be detailed and considered. I will give them without conditions.

You have already chosen Palin. It should be an easy thing for you to detail her actual qualifications at this time.

As I wrote above, your evasion is duly noted.

202 posted on 04/08/2010 9:04:55 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; Lakeshark

Lakeshark you won’t get anywhere with wtc911, he is purely anti social conservatism, but he plays it close to the vest and devotes his time to attacking Palin rather than supporting anyone.

If you look hard enough you can find him defending Rudy Giuliani, but basically for all his hostility and aggressive, antiPalin trolling, wtc911 is extremely timid about letting his preferences become revealed on this conservative web site.


203 posted on 04/08/2010 9:09:28 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

Arguendo as a romneybot, and antiPalin flamer in this current personality, just how many accounts do you have?


204 posted on 04/08/2010 9:11:43 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Two, and this is the only one I post from. Beyond that you aren’t worth addressing.


205 posted on 04/08/2010 9:17:01 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

And just put your money where your mouth is and bet on Palin. Since you think the experts are so wrong, there’s lots of money to be made there on Intrade.

But you’re not going to do it; you’re just going to keep mouthing off.


206 posted on 04/08/2010 9:23:37 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
There is no formal training to be President.

Thank you -- the only people who do not need OJT for this office are no longer Constitutionally-eligible for the post.

The Founders designed the system with purpose; the Constitution does not enumerate *qualifications* for elected office for good reason. Why so many fall for this line, ginned up by the lamestream and their oh-so-superior attitude is beyond me.

207 posted on 04/08/2010 9:39:00 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
Two, and this is the only one I post from. Beyond that you aren’t worth addressing.

Only two accounts? Have you looked at your home page recently?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

A couple of years are still missing, you have at least one more account here.


208 posted on 04/08/2010 9:45:11 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Oh, whoops, I didn’t realize I’d made it that obvious. I was hoping you’d waste an hour or two looking through my “Young Scholar” posting history for the one or two posts I made indicating that back in 2005 or 2006. Figured that would be hilarious.


209 posted on 04/08/2010 9:55:47 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo; moder_ator

You seem to be losing it a little.

What names are your other freeper accounts under?


210 posted on 04/08/2010 9:58:16 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
"...they wouldn’t be ignored."

Ah. You mean, like the way you have spent the last two days straight "ignoring" us? What a douchebag.

;-/

211 posted on 04/08/2010 9:59:29 AM PDT by Gargantua (DON'T TREAD ON US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; ansell
I didn't evade, I asked you a question.

There are only a handful or two of possible candidates, I've challenged you to list the qualifications of any of them you care to, and you won't.

Ansell is right, you're a troll.

212 posted on 04/08/2010 10:01:00 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

Eh, I come to these Palin threads hoping to find a gleam of evidence that some of her supports are actually thoughtful people, but I end up sticking around to be entertained by the low-brow debate (probably the same reason people turn on cable news).


213 posted on 04/08/2010 10:03:47 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

None, I asked that my real-name account be nuked years ago for professional reasons.

I only answered since this means so much to you. Do you have anything else going for you in life besides the little world you live in on Free Republic which you feel such a need to police?


214 posted on 04/08/2010 10:09:15 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

You are the troll with multiple accounts, you are the one that is in your second day of trolling on this thread, mocking and attacking freerepublic, dishing out nothing but insults and taunts while ignoring all substantive responses to your efforts, no wonder you need so many accounts.

Trolling and hijacking threads isn’t participating, it is clear that you are desperate for attention.

You still have at least a third account that we can’t look at at.


215 posted on 04/08/2010 10:22:03 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

Comment #216 Removed by Moderator

To: ansel12

As usual, you are lying. But, that’s all you have so what else can you do.


217 posted on 04/08/2010 10:55:50 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Sorry, you did evade by asking a question instead of answering the one already out there...but that is what every single one of you palinites do, isn't it? Not a single one of you can use her actual CV to justify her qualification to take the toughest job on the planet.

You and the other palinites can throw the word troll around all you want if you find it gratifying. It is meaningless.

218 posted on 04/08/2010 10:59:45 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: All

If the election were held right now, the stinky pile that my wonderful Scrappy left in the corner this morning has at LEAST a 50/50 chance against the now EXPOSED lying, racist, anti-Semitic, incompetent muslim that now occupies the White House.
The reason that obama will lose in a landslide is this: People are no longer afraid to criticize him.
The election framed those against him as racists.
Now he has a record that anyone can easily point to in opposition to him.
Scream it from the rooftops: “A VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT IS A VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!”


219 posted on 04/08/2010 11:00:18 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

The lie is you claiming that I am lying.

You defend Rudy Giuliani, you defend Mitt Romney, you constantly attack Palin, you will perch on her threads and troll non stop.

Which Protestant, social conservative, candidates would you like to see in the Presidents office?


220 posted on 04/08/2010 11:05:19 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson