[Islaminaction]

Islamic expansionism/threat ping list. If anyone wants on or off, please email me. Thanks!

[Chode]

not in the next three years anyway...

[ThunderSleeps]

obama is an idiot. Seriously, an idealistic idiot. Does he really think the world is full of people, or at least led by people, who will smile and say "awww" and not continue to develop their own nuclear weapons? Does he really think letting our nuclear stockpile age into questionable reliability is a good idea? He is a fool or worse.

[gitmo]

Benedict Arnold
Judas Iscariot
Neville Chamberlain

[Proud_USA_Republican]

Iran and Venezuela plan to fill the gap.

[rbosque]

He’s gonna cost American lives. You can bet on it.

[ducdriver]

He probably is not lying this time.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

That’s not your decision to make, tyrant.

Oh wait, were you going to push that mandate through with an Executive Order?

[Texas Fossil]

The US will Build no More Nukes

Unless Obozo destroys or renders useless what we have in stockpile, it will not change anything. We have more than enough and the delivery systems.

And I know some of the people who have produced them. Awsome weapons.

[HighlyOpinionated]

Until January 2013 when 0bama’s successor takes the oath of office, at least.

[rdl6989]

You picked a fine time to lead us Barack:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W57aBMYKvU

[Cheetahcat]

Go to Hell BO no one cares what you think.

[Habibi]

Uummm. I don’t believe we’ve developed any nuclear weapon systems for some time anyway. Sure, we still maintain our active weapons since they gotta’ be refurbed occasionally. And over the years their numbers have been reduced, but we still have plenty if we ever decide to terraform the planet.

Suffice to say, we’re more than a match for any of the nuclear powers as they currently stand. I don’t view Iran as a credible threat (but I don’t live in Europe or Israel either). Suffice to say that Israel, by itself, would make short work of Iran in a nuclear exchange. France or Great Britain would do the job even quicker, so there’s no shortage of deterrent ability if that is of any consequence (and it may not be if the “Twelvers” have anything to say about it).

A third world country with a few nukes is still a third world country. They can’t really use the weapon, but like people with “short man’s complex”, they love brandishing them. snazzy uniforms some middle eastern despots like to parade around in, their nukes will be for show.

Nukes are primarily a political weapon anyway. Granted, they can destroy cities with one pop, but if you use them first you die a fiery death. That’s the significant disincentive to their application. They are not going to be removed from the inventory in Obama’s administration, no matter what his posturing is towards his base. It sounds good to the leftist fringes, but it ain’t gonna’ happen.

[myknowledge]

Hoe about more advanced delivery systems?

[backhoe]

[samtheman]

No more until we dump your commie a$$, you rotten traitor.

[Thunder90]

We are building no more nukes. Meanwhile, in many a closed city in the “Former” Soviet Union, nuke building continues.

[Halgr]

...and so many folks deny that obama is a Manchurian Candidate.

Damn, can’t folks see how fast the strings are being pulled....he’s NOT DOING ALL THIS HIMSELF.