Posted on 03/26/2010 7:07:25 AM PDT by Elderberry
What President Obama has described as a monumental victory the passage of health-care reform legislation could be linked in court to the ongoing controversy over his eligibility to hold the nation's highest office. Attorney Orly Taitz now a candidate for secretary of state in California today provided to WND a court filing in which she asks that her eligibility challenge be joined with a case that contests the constitutionality of the Democrats' massive health-care plan. Taitz argues, "H.R. 3590 was signed into law by Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, who
never proved his legitimacy to the presidency. Therefore the act is invalid, as it was not signed by one legally entitled to sign it." Her e-mail documentation indicated she filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation under federal court rules. She's asking to link her case and the case brought by a long list of state attorneys general against the health-care law, Florida et al vs. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Taitz is suing Obama "in regards to damages suffered by her" as part of an amended complaint filed in federal court in Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Indeed.
Perhaps this is Obama’s way to make opposition to health care taboo?
I will sit here and give you guys telepathic support.
parsy, who is twiddling his thumbs
Bet you Orly sues all of them if they don't.
She can't sue them if it was never submitted to them. She filed the motion in the wrong place, she served the wrong people, and she used the wrong format, and that's just for starters. But it's not as if the address of the Panel, and instructions for submissions, are easy to find.
Oh wait, never mind:
They are until they don't agree with Orly's unique reading of the Constitution - then they become part of the conspiracy.
In short, the de facto officer doctrine.
http://scottsdale.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/judicial-officers-are-subject-to-the-de-facto-officer-doctrine-and-failure-to-object-to-the-appointment-of-a-judge-pro-tempore-is-a-procedural-defect-that-can-be-waived.aspx?googleid=218558
Then it is time to whack yourself.
NO, just NO!
Jarrett said the king was ready to rule, and he sure is trying. The problem is, he’s a petulant man child. He will fail. OTP.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7Nlq80DVpo
I’ll even buy the whacker for him to do it.
http://scottsdale.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/judicial-officers-are-subject-to-the-de-facto-officer-doctrine-and-failure-to-object-to-the-appointment-of-a-judge-pro-tempore-is-a-procedural-defect-that-can-be-waived.aspx?googleid=218558
Wrong. Wouldn't apply here. I stated, "How can that legislation be signed into law by a USURPER?"
"To satisfy the doctrine, the officer must be "in the unobstructed possession of the office and discharging its duties in full view of the public, in such manner and under such circumstances as not to present the appearance of being an intruder or usurper."
http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/SUPCT/160/op92-113.txt
This is absolutely right. The socialists are wizzing on the constitution before our eyes with the make believe health care bill and the Republicans aren’t pulling out the big guns. BOzo has not proven his eligibilty SO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT REPUBLICANS. Send in agents too tear the birth record building apart in Hawaii. The rule of law does not seem to matter any more so use new tactics.
Doesn’t apply to usurpers, says it right there.
lol.
We still have people here fawning over McCain. MCCain gave us McCain-Feingold which gave the Dems Congress in 2006/2008 and Obama in 2008.
I know that Third Parties are not the answer but it sure irks me that the ‘pubs sure can’t be considered as Conservative.
He's certainly intruded into my life.
"He's certainly intruded into my life."
And mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.