To: lucysmom
"
In short, the de facto officer doctrine.http://scottsdale.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/judicial-officers-are-subject-to-the-de-facto-officer-doctrine-and-failure-to-object-to-the-appointment-of-a-judge-pro-tempore-is-a-procedural-defect-that-can-be-waived.aspx?googleid=218558
Wrong. Wouldn't apply here. I stated, "How can that legislation be signed into law by a USURPER?"
"To satisfy the doctrine, the officer must be "in the unobstructed possession of the office and discharging its duties in full view of the public, in such manner and under such circumstances as not to present the appearance of being an intruder or usurper."
http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/SUPCT/160/op92-113.txt
52 posted on
03/27/2010 11:55:54 AM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
Doesn’t apply to usurpers, says it right there.
54 posted on
03/27/2010 12:01:00 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: rxsid
....as not to present the appearance of being an intruder...He's certainly intruded into my life.
59 posted on
03/27/2010 12:46:38 PM PDT by
azishot
(J.D. Hayworth...U.S. Senator FOR Arizona...http://www.jdforsenate.com/)
To: rxsid
One thing your pictures prove is that he is in full view of the public.
Before that, he was elected, the vote certified, and he was sworn in.
62 posted on
03/27/2010 4:39:13 PM PDT by
lucysmom
To: rxsid
Why the fu*k is Biden saluting ???
65 posted on
03/27/2010 7:26:57 PM PDT by
Lmo56
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson