Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'Slaughter Solition' As Epitome Of Obama 'Transparency'
Start Thinking Right ^ | March 17, 2010 | Michael Eden

Posted on 03/17/2010 11:33:40 AM PDT by Michael Eden

I'm sure anyone you meet can tell you all about the self executing rule that the Democrats are now relying upon to pass their health care boondoggle.

They will know all about the "Slaughter solution." It will be "transparent" to them.

Because this is the most "transparent" administration in history.

Right?

Wrong.

Democrats routinely demonized the Bush White House as "the most secretive administration in history." But it is now a documented fact that the Obama administration is at least 50% more secretive than Bush:

PROMISES, PROMISES: Is gov't more open with Obama? By SHARON THEIMER Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The government's use of legal exemptions to keep records secret rose during President Barack Obama's first year in office, despite promises of increased openness, an Associated Press review found.

The review of annual Freedom of Information Act reports filed by 17 major agencies found that overall, the use of nearly every one of the open-records law's nine exemptions to withhold information rose in fiscal year 2009, which ended last October. [...]

Major agencies cited that exemption to refuse records at least 70,779 times during the 2009 budget year, compared with 47,395 times during President George W. Bush's final full budget year, according to annual FOIA reports filed by federal agencies. Obama was president for nine months in the 2009 period.

This lack of transparency - hypocritical as it is because Obama demagogued Bush while promising to be so much better - has taken root in health care. His "transparency" is an outrageous and incredibly cynical lie just like all his other outrageous and incredibly cynical lies.

The Democrats are like the "Mr. Brooks" character portrayed by Kevin Costner: self-designated pillars of the community who are all the while actually brutal mass-murdering schizophrenic psychopaths. They say one thing in public, but the very ugly truth is a very different thing behind closed doors.

It’s rather fittingly ironic that ObamaCare is going to be shoved down our throats with Constitution-schmonstitution shenanigans named “The SLAUGHTER Solution” and “the Self EXECUTING Rule.

Barack Obama - who was THE most liberal U.S. Senator in Congress the year he announced his candidacy for president (in 2007) - stated as his core promise that he would "transcend the starkly red-and-blue politics of the last 15 years, end the partisan and ideological wars." But it turns out that he was a hard-core partisan ideologue radical. It turns out that he is the most polarizing president in history. It turns out that he would see this country erupt in flames not seen since the Civil War (when Republicans were as usual in the right and Democrats were as usual the party of genuine depravity) in order to impose an unpopular "fundamental transformation" onto the American people.

Now this lying demagogue - who attacked the reconciliation strategy as "majoritarian absolute power" right out of the ugliest pages of the Karl Rove playbook, and who claimed that anyone who would pursue such a strategy doesn't believe in government - is now hypocritically and cynically embracing a strategy that makes reconciliation look positively tame. I mean, at least you actually VOTED with reconciliation, even if that vote was a joke; with the "self executing" Slaughter solution, you don't even bother with such pretension, but merely "deem" it to have been voted upon.

In the modernized version of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, the line from today's bandits is, "Vote? We aint got no vote! We don't need no vote! I don't have to show you any stinking vote!"

Obama is the one who doesn't believe in government. The man who once said, "You’ve got to break out of what I call the sort of 50-plus-1 pattern of presidential politics. Maybe you eke out a victory of 50 plus 1, but you can’t govern," and who once said, "Karl Rove doesn’t need a broad consensus, because he doesn’t believe in government," now reveals himself to be the political anarchist who would blow up our entire political process in order to ram through his incredibly unpopular ideological agenda.

Our founding fathers went to war to rid themselves of a king who wasn't half the tyrant Barack Obama has revealed himself to be.

And all the while he keeps brazenly trying to pass himself off as something he absolutely is not.

Reminds me of what the Bible says about the devil:

"But I am not surprised! Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light" (2 Cor 11:14, NLT).


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhofascism; bhotyranny; deemocrats; democrats; healthcare; liberalfascism; obama; obamacare; slaughter; slaughterrule; slaughtersolition; socialisthealthcare; transparency; tyranny; unconstitutional

1 posted on 03/17/2010 11:33:40 AM PDT by Michael Eden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael Eden

Arabic for “courage”

“Hamas - Literally, “zeal” or “courage” in Arabic. It is also an acronym that stands for Islamic Resistance Movement, a militant Islamist Palestinian organization that opposes the existence of the state of Israel and favors the creation of an Islamic state in Palestine. Founded in 1987 in Gaza — and briefly encouraged by Israel as a counter to the PLO — it participated actively in the first intifada against Israel’s occupation. It began terrorist attacks on Israel in the late 1980s. Initially it opposed the 1993 Oslo peace agreement between the PLO and Israel, but it cooperated intermittently with the agreement during the 1990s. Since the outbreak of the second intifada in 2000, it has been one of the primary military organizations carrying out attacks on Israeli settlers, soldiers and civilians”

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4510714


The ONLY reason there might be any money in Health Care is because the older people, ill, injured, disabled and unborn will face rationed or otherwise severely cut medical care. Money saved by not covering them will lead directly to their deaths. Opening up estate monies will lead to spending by the heirs.

This proposition endorses the ABSENCE of life-reaffirming measures. While perhaps not yet euthanasia, as in Soros’ project on Death and Dying in America, the intentional absence of care, starvation and perhaps even dehydration due to regulation of water in a certain area, or making people choose between power and provision, it is the removal of life support guaranteed in the phrase “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

It is amazing these ‘representatives’ think they will not be affected, or that their families will, in turn, not end up among those hardest hit, is it not? Do they REALLY think there is no reckoning, anywhere? Eventually, there will be no one not affected, after all.

You fall in a category of

tobacco use

advanced aged

obesity

disability

anxiety

depression

pick a category, etc.

And, add to that list what was sent to me...

* history of voting GOP
* history of not donating to DNC
* history of not paying taxes, no matter the reasons
* any history that can be translated as subversive, anti-union, etc.
* and so on.......

...and 1st, there’ll be a counseling session

...then, you’ll be assigned to a ‘doctor’ or comminty aide or some such to evaluate you, and you’ll get a ‘mark’ or patch or a cross to wear on an armband. Maybe even a red cross.

...then, you’ll be told that you’re not making the correct amount of progress

...then, you’ll be grouped into some facility to participate in ‘active’ treatment

...then,...you’re out of the way.

And, your heirs will get your money to spend as they wish.


Search the Sor0bama inaugural for yourselves. The word ‘life’ is mentioned 2 times, at least one of which referred to history. Ditto liberty. And, the pursuit of happiness. No where is ‘Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness’ mentioned. At all.


Please ask your Congressperson which religions are covered in the religious exemption mentioned in Section 1402(g)(1) and what provisions people practicing such religions are exempt from. Health Care? Education?

Specficially: Such religions as ‘the Secretary deems appropriate’ are ‘exempt’ from application of the Health Care bill, but what provisions of the bill they’re exempt from, etc. But, the history of the Hijri calendar is that it was 1st used in 1402 AD in the Gregorian calendar.

So, 1402 G - 1 could be a code word shout out to Islam. Since this is forcing ‘charity,’ the entire thing is zakat, the paying of alms to poor, widows and orphans, or, a perversion of it. One of the five pillars of Islam. Get it? You sort of have to think right to left, not left to right.

My point is simply that the whole bill is a declaration of war from a perspective I hadn’t even thought of—a missive from Bin Laden to take the economy out completely, even while Muslims may end up exempt. Year ‘One’.


Health Bill H.R. 3200, Religious Conscience Exemption and sect. 1402

http://www.pajamahadin.com/?p=1376


In re finding Section 1402(g)(1):

“The origins of the hijra calendar are recorded as having begun in AD 1402 on the Gregorian Calendar, so that the equivalent beginning of the hijra year 1 corresponds to 1402 in the Gregorian calendar:

“1402 A.H. began with the Lunation No. 728 in October 1981.
A conversion of Hijra years into the Gregorian calendar may be made using the following relationship:-
Christian Era (A.D.) = 621.54 + (Hijra in years and decimals) X 0.970225 “”

http://home.pacific.net.sg/~makhdoom/calend2.html


There are references in the Health Care Bill, but, nothing beyond a reference to IRS code, although there is language in the Health Care bill, as there has been for some time:

171
•J. 55–345
1 sion thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and
2 an adherent of established tenets or teachings
3 of such sect or division as described in such sec4
tion.
5 ‘‘(B) EXEMPTION.—An application for the
6 exemption described in subparagraph (A) shall
7 be filed with the Secretary at such time and in
8 such form and manner as the Secretary may
9 prescribe. Any such exemption granted by the
10 Secretary shall be effective for such period as
11 the Secretary determines appropriate.


2 posted on 03/17/2010 11:42:26 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

“And, your heirs will get your money to spend as they wish....”

You are WAAAY too optimistic here....the gov’mt will estate tax them to zip..nada...


3 posted on 03/17/2010 11:43:35 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson