Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2010 10:12:17 AM PST by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Shellybenoit

Um, because he has bigger fish to fry???


2 posted on 02/24/2010 10:14:32 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Ummm. Because he too is anti-Catholic?


3 posted on 02/24/2010 10:18:29 AM PST by Andyman (The truth shall make you FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
“The Pope’s statement that condoms don’t help control the spread of HIV, but rather condoms increase infection rates, is hurting people in the name of Jesus."

Such a typical democrat, obamanista @sshole.

The democrat-condom way is better than the Christian-patience way?

I swear, these scum are the spawn of Ishmael himself.

4 posted on 02/24/2010 10:19:51 AM PST by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

>> Agree or disagree with the Pope’s stance on condoms, that statement was justifiably offensive to Catholics. Especially when you consider that Papal Infallibility is a basic tenet of Catholicism.

I actually agree with the Pope’s stance on condoms, and think the statement was ridiculous and offensive.

That being said — would you define any vocal disagreement with Pope (or vocal disagreement with Papal infallibility) as anti-Catholic and thus “justifiably offensive”? I believe the Pope to be an educated theologian, but not infallible. I don’t believe he is wrong about this ... but I believe he is wrong about other things.

I find the statement offensive because it uses the name of Christ to promote a fundamentally immoral program — people must choose between their faith and their sexual promiscuity, not their faith and their safety during that promiscuity.

Is it offensive because of the content of the statement, or because the statement represents a denial and contradiction to the concept of papal infallibility?

SnakeDoc


5 posted on 02/24/2010 10:36:18 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (Do you know if the hotel is pager friendly? [...] I'm not getting a sig on my beeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
Why is the POTUS Ignoring Concerns About His Anti-Catholic Religious Adviser ?

Is this a trick question?

…The pope’s rejection of scientifically proven

This stated anywhere in the Obama administration of Newspeak is stand-up comedy...probably at its worst, but it has to be seen as such.

6 posted on 02/24/2010 10:39:49 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
... Especially when you consider that Papal Infallibility is a basic tenet of Catholicism...

Do you know if the Pope was speaking Ex Cathedra?

7 posted on 02/24/2010 10:50:15 AM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

So much of what the Fedgov does is unconstituitonal, and having a "President's Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships" is defintely on the list of purely unconsitutional stuff. I'm at the point of thinking that a total financial and economic collpase might be just what the doctor ordered. If the Fedgov (or other levels of gov) have no money, they can't pay all these idiots and leftist scum money, and they'd be out of jobs. And the country would be much improved.

8 posted on 02/24/2010 11:28:34 AM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Obama Banana is ignoring protests about his anti-Catholic appointee because The Banana is anti-Catholic. Duh. The Thing is also anti-American, or haven’t you noticed?


10 posted on 02/24/2010 12:14:21 PM PST by Tulsa Jack (Tulsa Jack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
POTUS was raised un-churched, by a socialist family, when he did go to church it was to a heretical Universalist church. He has no sense of Christ or Christianity..so why should his "advisors."

Articles show that he had Muslim friends in college, my guess is that is his inclination

Don't worry it is not just Catholics..it is all of us.

11 posted on 02/24/2010 12:14:54 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson