Posted on 02/19/2010 9:24:01 AM PST by Stoutcat
Professor Amy Bishop, the tenure-seeking neurobiologist who cold-bloodedly killed three of her colleagues and seriously injured several more in her shooting spree, is now claiming indigence and has requested a public defender, rather than shelling money out of her own pocket, or that of her husband, James Anderson...
The Times reports that Ms. Bishop answered “No” to each of these questions. Presuming that UAH does, in fact, fire her, she’s out of a job.
But is she actually destitute?
(Excerpt) Read more at grandrants.wordpress.com ...
I read this the other day and could not believe it. Meanwhile, the funerals will be today and tomorrow.
She(and husband) certainly have money in the bank. They had sold at least a couple of medical inventions. Hubby is still employed.
I suppose it's all a dodge in order not to have to pay for a lawyer. But why would she want a public defender on a capital charge? Maybe she is crazy. Or maybe the Crazy Prof Defense League will dig her up a dream team.
What else would you expect from a loony left liberal obama supporter? Their aim in life is to suck as much tax payer blood as they can till they die. Hopefully, she will be found guilty and executed.
This is what Obama does all the time. "I'm closing this door, and keeping this meeting private, as part of my promise to make my administration totally transparent."
How many college professors are destitute? None. But that doesn't matter. Just go about your business.
A fine example of great parenting. Bishop’s and Anderson’s children should be removed from that diabolical home and placed with a sane family.
Where is CPS? If these were trailer park parents the kids would have already been placed in a foster home.
Move on their is nothing to see here folks. When a leftist nut goes off if the leftist media doesn’t notice it didn’t happen.
It’s very unlikely that any proceeds from the invention were in their personal names. Almost certainly corporate assets, and since my understanding is that the invention has yet to go to market, they probably sold it for stock in the entity that would market it, or for a right to future proceeds.
Presumably she and her husband have at least a little money in the bank, but with four children, and academic jobs not paying much, and the husband apparently more-or-less self-employed in a biotech startup, they may have very little.
Wonder about the culpability of her husband.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.