Posted on 01/29/2010 5:39:05 PM PST by Dajjal
Red Flags in Hawaii
by butterdezillion
People are asking how so many terrorist red flags could be overlooked by so many. The same way these birther red flags were not only overlooked but ridiculed:
1. DOH Director Fukino illegally hid until Nov 2009 the DOH Administrative Rules showing that election officials could have received a copy of Obamas original birth certificate without his permission. The DOH has said they cant release any records without Obamas permission. But HRS 338-18(a) allows state laws and DOH rules to govern the disclosure of vital records, and the current rules -Chapter 8b, 2.5(A)(1)(f) - would allow any election officer transacting the placement of Obamas name on the ballot to receive a certified copy.
2. The DOH has falsely said that HRS 338-18 prohibits disclosure of government processing records. There are 2 kinds of records records of the vital events themselves, and records of the governments handling of those records.
Certificates are the record of the vital events. HRS 338-18(a) says that information about the actual birth, death, marriage, and divorce events may only be released according to the provisions set by law or Department of Health rules, thus referring everyone to the DOH Administrative Rules to see how information on actual certificates may be disclosed and to whom. Far from barring any disclosure as claimed by the DOH, current Administrative Rules allow a non-certified abbreviated copy of a birth (Chapter 8b, 2.5B), marriage (Ch 8b, 2.8C), or death (Ch8b, 2.6C) certificate to be released to anyone who asks for it. However, a public statement of where someone was born such as Fukinos July 27, 2009 statement about Obama is not allowed by the rules (Ch 8b, 2.1A).
(Excerpt) Read more at butterdezillion.wordpress.com ...
I think you have to go to the blog for the links to work.
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
I put this blog together one night in the hopes that John Charlton could link to the evidence in the article at Post & Email. I’m a computer moron and can’t figure out how I got the hyperlinks to work, or how to edit the original article so I can link to articles with better explanations.
Sorry for any hassle, and if anybody knows how to help me I’d be eternally grateful. =)
I know this will sound crazy, but I remind myself that before the end comes there will have to be really frustrating stuff. So if doors close on this issue, it could be because we’re nearing the end. I guess we’ll see. But I know that the outcomes are in God’s hands so I’m trying not to sweat the details too much.
Given how much liberals LOVE the idea of using foreign court decisions to decide U.S. cases, I do not see ANY reason why theyd object if we insisted in following the path laid down by the HONDURAN SUPREME COURT!
bttt
Second ping. . . . FYI. - Perhaps bookmark Article and #1 for future reference.
[Good job Butterdezillion.]
With regard to records pertaining to Stanley Ann Dunham, who is widely known as a matter of public record to be deceased, you requested documents pertaining to Ms. Dunham involving entry and exits into and out of United States from January 01, 1960 through December 31, 1975. and January 1, 1979 through December 31, 1985. There are no entry.exit records available prior to 1982, either in electronic or paper format.
A search for documents responsive to your request produced a total of one page. CBP has determined that the one page is partially releasable pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. 5 552 (b)(2)(high), (b)(2)(low), (b)(6), and (b)(7). Enclosed is one page With certain information withheld as described below.
I SAVED IT.FWIW
Wasn’t her surname Obama for a while until the divorce? And then Soetoro?
Was a request made with those surnames, do you know?
I do not know anything other than what is stated here:
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.