Posted on 01/14/2010 8:48:16 PM PST by American Dream 246
Paul Mirengoff says Ambassador John Bolton argues that several elements have combined to induce Barack Obama to enroll in the essentially European project of global governance. Among these elements are Obama's underlying lack of interest in foreign policy and national security (to him, they are distractions), his sense that America is too powerful, and his desire to eschew old-fashioned patriotism in favor of a "post-American" presidency.
Although Obama is constrained by domestic political considerations from fully articulating his preference for ceding sovereignty in favor of global governance, Bolton finds clear evidence of that preference on several fronts. Obama's approach to "climate change" is perhaps the clearest example. Climate change is the main issue through which the "global governance" crowd seeks to gain power. Far from resisting this attack on our right of self-governance, Obama has sided with the Europeans. As Mark Steyn would point out later in the day, it took the Chinese to save us from ourselves at Copenhagen.
But there is some folly that even the Chinese can't save us from. Bolton noted that U.S. intelligence satellites are now being used in part to monitor change. He added that when he was in government, these assets were in extremely high demand just to serve their traditional purpose of figuring out what our enemies were up to.
Bolton also cited our approach to preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. With respect to North Korea and Iran, we have deferred to the "global community" and now rely on a policy of begging these countries to negotiate with us. Although negotiating is a good tactic for a nation like Iran that still needs time to develop nuclear weapons, Iran has resisted because it knows there will be no adverse consequences. Thus, Iran does not even need to negotiate in order to avoid U.S. action, and by holding out, it can expect to receive additional inducements to come to the table, if it comes to that.
Ultimately, says Bolton, Iran and North Korea are understandably confident that they can "roll" Obama. In the meantime, the rest of the world sees a weak U.S., and when we ultimately fail to stop either nation, the floodgates of nuclear proliferation will open.
Bolton argues, as we have almost since we started blogging, that the only way to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons is to attack its nuclear facilities. For Obama such an attack is out of the question, so that leaves Israel. Bolton did not predict whether Israel will attack Iran, but he noted that it will be forced to make its decision soon.
Bolton holds out some hope that the opposition movement in Iran will succeed, and he bemoans the fact that during the past decade, we did so little to help it. In recent years, power has flowed to the revolutionary guard, making an overthrow of the government more difficult in some ways.
In any event, Bolton questions whether a change in government, even to a democratic system, would cause Iran not to develop nukes, and he believes that, even with such a change, the Saudis and others in the region would feel the need to develop nukes.
Finally, Bolton predicts that Obama will soon enter into an arms control agreement with Russia. The agreement will be one-sided, with the U.S. agreeing to a reduction in both weapons and delivery systems. This, in turn, will further undermine our ability to project power and be regarded as an additional sign of our weakness.
Treaties must be ratified by the Senate by a two-thirds vote. Bolton predicts a massive fight on this question. He notes, however, that even in the absence of a ratified treaty, a Democratic majority could, working with Obama, make unilateral cuts.
Obama may not be all that interested in foreign policy, but he still seems poised to make plenty of mischief in that domain.
2012 may be too late for our nation.
I trust Bolton.
Obama...No.
Yep!
I trust Obozo - to do everything he possible can to weaken our country.
Paging Captian Obvious. Captian Obvious to the thread, please!
“Russia needs more weapons to punch through America’s new missile defence shield, Vladimir Putin said yesterday in blunt remarks that will complicate efforts to cut the nuclear arsenals of the former Cold War rivals.”
Hopefully, Putin’s words and deeds will make it impossible for Obama to make any sort of agreement this year. Then the voters can take away the poser’s power to do anything meaningful at the ballot box this November.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6970921.ece
Ditto, I have always trusted Bolton and valued his observations. t
obama is not interested in foreign policy because he is primarily interested in defeating white americans and redistributing their spoil.
I know what the lying jug-eared communist is about. The question is how can he be stopped?
Palin-Bolton, 2012!
Obama has larger visions for himself. His extreme narcissism compels him to transcend national power in the USA, to aggrandize to himself global power.
He will use US power to achieve his goal.
People are blind to salient facts:
The UN is headquartered in New York.
The US can and does project power on a global basis—we have no rival militarily.
Europe is a raped hag fellating Islam—it is over for Europe. I still laugh although uncomfortably at the people who babble about Europe or Rome being the seat of the Anti-Christ. It is about origin more than geography. The USA was born of Europe and has assumed the mantle of power over both Europe and the defunct British Empire.
The USA still runs the financial markets—why does everyone blame the US for the worldwide depression? Because our Banksters, in concert with their pals overseas, did in fact crash the world economy.
We have the military to back up what the Banksters do. No one else can do that.
Yet to come (i.e. I have left fact for speculation):
China will challenge the New World Order militarily, but not yet.
Obama, laugh as you will, is the most violent and unstable politician to ever ascend to a position of global influence since the days of Hitler and Stalin. He has just yet to inculcate the indwelling of Satan to fully achieve his goals...
Granted, his skills on his own are feeble. But he is an empty vessel awaiting the arrival of his master.
Or not.
ABSOLUTELY!!! Palin/Bolton. That’s the absolute best case scenario and with that ticket we cover it all!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.