Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Military Forces Refusing Orders from Barack Obama and Taking it to Court (Video)
2setufree / YouTube ^ | December 25, | 2setufree

Posted on 12/26/2009 8:02:56 PM PST by USALiberty

US Military Forces are refusing to take Orders from Obama unless he can prove he is a US Citizen. They plan Court action as theie Lawyers are taking Briefs as we speak.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; constitution; december; kenyanusurper; military; obama; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-263 next last
To: Patrick1

You have that right to your opinion. I respectfully disagree. This subject shows more clearly than almost anything that Obama is a liar and is hiding his past and probably other things.


141 posted on 12/27/2009 3:53:09 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (There is no "O" in Transparency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

>>“Zero the Magnificent” has control of the Nuclear Football, has the ability to start a Nuclear war and will not release his Birth Certificate. All his records are sealed. Do you see anything wrong with that?.

I certainly do.

>You don’t think the FBI conducted a thorough background check on Obama during the primaries?

The FBI could have had their hands tied behind their backs, politically speaking. I know for a fact that politicians like Senators and Congressmen can, and do, get special treatment [front-of-line & expedited-processing] for things like passports. I would be utterly unsurprised to find out that minimal ID checks are also required in such situations.

Also, take a look at Geithenr, Rangle, Frank, and Dodd’s taxes (or rather lack thereof). That is blatant lawbreaking AND, as we’ve seen, nobody [justice department-wise] seems to care. I’m convinced that most, if not all, the rules don’t apply to our “benevolent” overlords.

>You don’t think Obama’s primary opponents had investigators check him out?

I honestly don’t know if they did or not. You have to remember that his “opponents” nominated John McCain... so it sure doesn’t seem like they were serious about actually trying to win.

That McCain had trouble with the Natural Born Citizen clause too. (It could be argued that he was ineligible as well.) Maybe giving the people only a choice of two candidates who fail the Natural Born Citizen clause was merely/actually an end-run to get a precedent for violating it.

>You don’t think a thorough background check was done on Obama when he ran for the Senate?

Like I’ve illustrated (and some speculation, yes) I’m fairly certain that the mentality of the political in-crowd of laws being for other people IS a main theme in Obama’s life.


142 posted on 12/27/2009 4:10:24 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
No they don't count.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

143 posted on 12/27/2009 5:40:35 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Quix; onyx; little jeremiah

*ping*


144 posted on 12/27/2009 5:46:48 PM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Felis_irritable
Old Saul is probably spinning in his grave that his tactics are being used (if even inadvertently) by conservatives. Screw him.

Exactly! :)

145 posted on 12/27/2009 7:13:06 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

THX THX.


146 posted on 12/27/2009 7:46:45 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: ecinkc
“REALLY?! Do you think Hawaii Dept of Health would describe themselves as legally obligated to step in and say, “No, that image on the web does not accurately reflect the records we have on file?” How does that fit with their constant insistence that they cannot legally comment on whether or not the online short-form COLB is accurate? Do you suppose it’s their policy to withhold verification on documents that are accurate, while at the same time, being obligated to declare any frauds to be frauds? “Well, we can’t legally verify it as accurate, but if it were inaccurate we’d tell you instantly.” That’s almost as dumb as Patrickl saying, “The certificate of birth that is supported by the current Republican Governor of Hawaii.” What?

Ok, I’m sure you’ve given good logical explanations to this that I’ve heretofore missed, so just give me a link if that’s all you have time for. If you don’t have a good answer for this sloppiness, retract your statement or else further solidify your place on the troll list.”

So, to the question: “Do you think Hawaii Dept of Health would describe themselves as legally obligated to step in and say, “No, that image on the web does not accurately reflect the records we have on file?”

Yes. I do. It's really that simple. If (1) Hawaii has no record of a major Presidential candidate being born in Hawaii, and (2) his campaign is passing off an online image that resembles an official Hawaiian document and that purports to state he was born there...then yes. They are under absolutely no privacy regulation or other legal obligation to support the scam. They don't have to collude in illegal behavior and would not do so.

In this context, Hawaii representatives specifically said they have verified they have the original records. The only reasonable interpretation of that is that said records say he was born in Hawaii. At that point, it doesn't even matter if his grandmother filed it. It's done. The official records of a state admitted to the Union say he was born there. That's presumptive, requires real evidence to dispute, not speculation and laughable Kenyan birth certificates.

My position really is that simple. And it's not just Hawaii. Both John McCain and Hillary Clinton had very real incentive to demonstrate Obama was not born in the US if there was any truth to it. Neither went there.

I think anyone who talks about stunning backroom collusion, real live states with damning evidence being intimidated by a campaign, etc., etc. has been watching too many movies. The stories for why he wasn't born in Hawaii are all convoluted and hidden and have any number of interlinking trip wires that fall apart on examination (you know, when you watch one of those movies and suddenly go “hey, wait a minute...). The story for his being born in Hawaii is simple and straight forward. It's staring you right in the face. How the math shakes out seems pretty obvious to me.

It's that old adage: When you stare too long at the shadows, you start seeing things that simply aren't there.

And, no offense, but I honestly could care less about the troll list. If I'm on it, it's imaginary, too.

147 posted on 12/27/2009 7:49:41 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Felis_irritable
“The “birther” thing is classic Saul Alinsky. *If* 0 is in fact not a citizen, great. *If* in fact he is, well, they've been harassed, harried, and forced to confront, more or less, one more issue, which will take time from their project of destroying this country”

It's taking no time from anything. Just makes conservatives look silly.

Old Saul would be getting a good laugh out of it if he were still around.

148 posted on 12/27/2009 7:52:24 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis

Core principle of Sumo Wrestling: If your opponent is advancing press forward; and if your opponent is retreating press forward.

The Birther movement has the mass, we just need to keep thrusting. We will knock him out of the ring, no matter how many George Soroses support him.


149 posted on 12/27/2009 7:53:53 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
Fulfilling their oath to protect and defend against enemies both foreign and domestic.
150 posted on 12/27/2009 8:02:22 PM PST by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty; STE=Q; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
151 posted on 12/27/2009 9:47:44 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68; Patrick1; tired_old_conservative
.
Why are 0bama’s Noelani Kindergarten records oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education?

This is an important feature because K-records for original school entry would have contained the following:

1. His REAL Birth Certificate.

2. An application with the following:

—1. His Legal name.
—2. Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
—3. Date of Birth
—4. Place of Birth
—5. Immunization Records
(revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)

It also is important for two reasons:

A. The Dept. of Education does not “lose” the records of one particular student. (Who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)

B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide which could possibly ‘excuse’ the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records.

For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public, his true life story.

This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?

This is the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of an intentionally erased life of a fraudulent conman and it reeks of complicity by officials within the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Health & Dept. of Education.
.

152 posted on 12/27/2009 9:51:49 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

What he means is that getting rid of Obama is not going to get rid of the rest of the Socialists.

We need to concentrate at the grassroots level and concentrate on winning both houses of congress back. The house in 2010 and the Senate in 2012.

Just beating Obama is not going to do us much good.


153 posted on 12/27/2009 9:54:36 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the ping!


154 posted on 12/27/2009 10:02:31 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

4. Place of Birth
~~~
Kenya ?...


155 posted on 12/27/2009 10:12:47 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Add to your list....

Barry Soetoro’s legal name change to Barack Hussein Obama.

The B/C passed off on the net as Barry’s can not be his legal B/C. At age six he was adopted, his legal b/c would not have Obama Sr. listed as the father, Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo would be.

Barry could go into court an legally change his name; he could not go into any court and have his adoption “reversed”. Legally, Soetoro is his father.

Where’s the B/C Dear Leader?


156 posted on 12/27/2009 11:31:52 PM PST by Brytani (Support Allen West For Congress - www.allenwestforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Add to your list....

Barry Soetoro’s legal name change to Barack Hussein Obama.

The B/C passed off on the net as Barry’s can not be his legal B/C. At age six he was adopted, his legal b/c would not have Obama Sr. listed as the father, Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo would be.

Barry could go into court an legally change his name; he could not go into any court and have his adoption “reversed”. Legally, Soetoro is his father.

Where’s the B/C Dear Leader?


157 posted on 12/27/2009 11:33:23 PM PST by Brytani (Support Allen West For Congress - www.allenwestforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Even if he WAS born in Hawaii, which is very doubtful, he still is a British/E.U. citizen making him a dual citizen, and for good measure possible a triple citizen adding Indonesia as his home country!!!


158 posted on 12/27/2009 11:44:32 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

The generals are in the Soetoro’s pockets, otherwise they would NOT be generals. So the once who still have sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution have to come from lower ranks, and it’s their rights to do so!!!


159 posted on 12/27/2009 11:48:26 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Did those announcements prevent him from dual of triple citizenship???


160 posted on 12/27/2009 11:50:24 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson