Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, Moe; but I have to rebut your OFA assessment
RedState.com ^ | Dec. 21, 2009 | ladyimpactohio

Posted on 12/23/2009 11:29:37 PM PST by grey_whiskers

It’s “not dead yet…”

http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/12/18/correcting-the-record-on-organizing-for-america/ to quote Monty Python.

Organizing for America is a hollow shell. It’s been a hollow shell from pretty much the moment that it stopped being a ’sexy*’ campaign tool that didn’t actually require its members to do anything except hand over money and votes.

Not an empty shell, either.

OFA. Organizing for America. An arm of the DNC that operates under the auspices of our so-called “Thief in Chief.” I have been frustrated with all the crapola going down in DC, and couldn’t figure out why Conservatives are losing all the time. But I have hit on the answer. We are not organized. We have not learned community organizing from the finest Community Organizer in Chief.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: astroturf; collegekids; ofa; redstate
This is a comment on the nuts-and-bolts behind the grass-roots "organizing for America" movement to support Obama, primarily on college campuses.

There is a lot of good stuff here, if you read it.

But I think there are a couple of points which are not mentioned on the site:

1. The fact that the groups not only meet together regularly under close supervision (Obama Youth?), but the constant psychological reinforcement among the members makes them almost impervious to reason: they will get their approval from their own group, almost like cult members, and will react instinctively to protect against any threat. Think of the trained attack dogs in Animal Farm.

2) This shows the strength of Obama as a "community organizer."

3) Who is paying for all this stuff?

4) How will all of these databases, tracking information, etc., be applied to keep NON-members in line? Report formats can be modified to keep tabs on perceived enemies as well. (See also here.)

Other thoughts, contact, diagnosis welcome.

Cheers!

...and Merry Christmas.

1 posted on 12/23/2009 11:29:39 PM PST by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; markomalley; joinedafterattack; anymouse; fulltlt; Kaslin
Like, *PING*, dudes and dude-ettes.

Cheers!

2 posted on 12/23/2009 11:32:23 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

You know what, this is just bureaucracy at work.

When you have a bunch of government workers of course they will turn it into a huge bureaucracy just to run the campaign.

Just because you gather the data, what are you going to do with it? How does it drive your decisions? etc...

The first thing in effective management is to ask if it is even worth doing the task, does it add value?

If not, don’t do it.

I am not particularly impressed to see the Democrats wasting money on all of this. It just says to me, they aren’t focused. They have had so much money injected in the last election that they did a shot gun approach, a lot of this will never pan out.


3 posted on 12/23/2009 11:59:49 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson