Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2009 7:11:43 AM PST by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MaxCUA

It wouldnt surprise me to see the MSM embrace her like it did McLame because they think she will be easy to beat in 2012


2 posted on 12/17/2009 7:15:53 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

“I would also urge conservatives who hate or fear Obama to read his autobiography to better understand the man behind the political leader and thus heal their own biases.”

That’s the difference between Liberals and Conservatives. Most Conservatives have read Obama’s books, I know I have. And he came off as being against everything our country stands for in his books as well. This is why we do not like him.


3 posted on 12/17/2009 7:25:13 AM PST by Wee-Weed Up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

Dad said, after reading the book the second time (and working on the third) that any one who reads the book will like her.....Make sure we all donate copies to the local high school libraries.


4 posted on 12/17/2009 7:26:37 AM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

I wonder if it isn’t the real, honest to goodness discovery that the woman is not a cartoon - that she does in fact believe what she believes. I think it comes as a shock to a lefty that she isn’t a complete ideologue (the author seemed truly shocked that Sarah would choose child rearing over senate run, for instance) as are most leftists.

Not saying this is true, but it is possible that when confronted with someone like this they really don’t know what to do. Let’s face it, even they know by now that there are simply no skeletons in the closet and they aren’t going to run her off. I think they are wondering what to do next and maybe, as convoluted as it may sound, they are just plain bumfuzzled.

Of course at the end of the piece, he couldn’t help himself and is dismissive of the poor old simple minded right wing inability to think clearly, but this is a lefty. Not sure I read this as a rave as much as an admission that they need to do some serious recon...because Sarah ain’t going away and she isn’t going to run.


5 posted on 12/17/2009 7:26:42 AM PST by jessduntno ("The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

there is a problem in seeing conservative and progressive as two ways to ostensibly reach the same goal- progressives don’t have the same goal, and they are not willing to work within the Founders’ framework to achieve whatever goals they have. That said, we know of course that their goal is the destruction of the Founders’ framework: the Constitution. The writer may be well intentioned but he apparently has no clue what his side is really after.


8 posted on 12/17/2009 7:28:39 AM PST by visualops (Freepin' on my Pre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

Amazing what happens when you actually read the book instead of wolfing down the media and blog hate spew.


9 posted on 12/17/2009 7:29:54 AM PST by listenhillary (I believe AGW is real now. It was caused by scientists and greenies LYING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

Interesting that he says to read Sarah’s book to get a better understanding of her, then to read Obummer’s book to get a better understanding of him, I think he meant to say to get a better understanding of BHO, read Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”


10 posted on 12/17/2009 7:31:10 AM PST by TiredofItalltoo (tiredofitalltoo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

I think Maureen Dowd liked it too.


11 posted on 12/17/2009 7:32:14 AM PST by rintense (You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA
Huffington likes Palin, Dean said he would not vote for the health care bill, Olberman said he would go to jail before buying an O care policy......... Hell is defiantly freezing over.
12 posted on 12/17/2009 7:45:11 AM PST by rightly_dividing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

“Try getting thousands of ordinay folks to line up in town after town after town”..........

Wait a minute, Mitt is coming out with a book in the Spring. No doubt he will get dozens of fans at his book signing, since he’s the leader in the polls......for something......lol


15 posted on 12/17/2009 9:22:39 AM PST by radioone (Alinskys rules for radicals: Ridicule is a better tactic than argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

I went and read the comments on the HuffPo site. I would have commented, but I’ve been banned from doing so by the HuffPo moderators. It was surprising that a column fairly favorable to Palin only had 18 comments. I’ve seen a few positive pieces on HuffPo and they usually attract hundreds of unhinged loons attacking, not only Palin, but the author of the column. This may be an indication that Palin hatred is on the wane, or are all the usual loons still in bed.


16 posted on 12/17/2009 11:52:01 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson