[DogBarkTree]

It wouldnt surprise me to see the MSM embrace her like it did McLame because they think she will be easy to beat in 2012

[SmokingJoe]

“It wouldnt surprise me to see the MSM embrace her like it did McLame because they think she will be easy to beat in 2012”

Huffington Post is not even the MSM. They are a loony left outfit.
And two, anyone who thinks Sarah Palin will be “easy to beat” in 2012, has not been paying attention to the polls, or anything that has been going on since her book came out in November.
No one, but no one, on the political scene generates as much strong support right now as Sarah Palin does.
Try getting thousands of ordinay folks to line up in town after town after town, in freezing cold, overnight, just to wait for any other politician to sign their book and see where that gets ya.

[Dr. Sivana]

It wouldnt surprise me to see the MSM embrace her like it did McLame because they think she will be easy to beat in 2012

Her values, the fact that Trig exists, and the impulse to stomp on any woman or racial minority or Hispanic by the laft will keep that from happening, even if we did think she was easy pickings. We weren't able to keep from blasting Dean in '04 ... it was too much fun!

The difference between her and McCain is that she has already been exposed to the media vituperation, and is still standing. She has no interests of illusions about them being potential friends or partners. These days, she is effectively working Judo on them, using their own force against them.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

read his autobiography to better understand the man behind the political leader

That's excellent advice. And if you really, really want to understand the man behind the political leader, read "Fugitive Days" while you're at it. Steal a copy if you can.

[convertedtoreason]

Well, this woman is definitely NOT MCLAME.

SHE FIGHTS, SHE ROARS, SHE DOESN’T SEAT AROUND AND JUST ACCEPT WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING.

Her book explained herself more than the VETTING of McLame, the Democratic Machinery (surprise!) and the Lying Media.

Moreover ... she’s undeniably MORE CHARISMATIC than Obama.

Alternatives:

1. Ron Paul: No need to vet; the media will just describe him as a Kook and 2/3 of Americans will just instantly believe;

2. Romney/Huck: These two beta males will even get 30% of the votes nationally - they are totally damaged policy wise and integrity wise. Polls are lying.

3. Pawlenty, Daniels, Barbour: MN, IN and MS econ status are much worse than Alaska I tell you; Each has to explain so many things.

4. McDonnell: He’s quite good. I dunno if he will take the path of Sarah Palin - 1st termer going rouge for P or VP by 2012. But if he can keep his name, 2016 or even 2020 will presumably be his prime time.

If you know another potential name, please tell us now. He/she has to be introduced and be known ... “NOW” and not 2011.

That’s the only way to fight an INCUMBENT seeking a 2nd Term. More Recent Proof: Reagan vs. Carter - Reagan had had four (4) years of campaigning (technically) and attacking the policies of the incumbent (Carter) before finally bagging his huge victory vs. the weakest Dem President. Geesh. If I could remember it right, Reagan had a regular radio bashing of Carter.