Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Brady Campaign against their own words
Examiner ^ | 11/12/09

Posted on 11/12/2009 10:42:09 AM PST by FromLori

Back in late October, I wrote "Brady Campaign hypocrisy," chiding the Brady Campaign--specifially, their Vice President for Law and Policy, Dennis Henigan--for his accusation that the "gun lobby" tries to hide the truth.

This accusation positively reeks of hypocrisy, on a couple levels.

First, Henigan himself, in arguing on a video clip that the Second Amendment did nothing to protect the individual's right to keep and bear arms, recited the amendment in its entirety--except for the "of the people" part--the very part that poses the biggest problem for the now discredited "collective rights" interpretation of the Second Amendment. Second, when this clumsy bit of Constitutional editing on the Brady Campaign's part was publicly exposed (I'd like to think I played a role in that), they did everything they could to erase all Internet tracks of the video segment--taking it down from YouTube and from their website, and bullying the web hosts wherever copies of it were posted, claiming copyright infringement.

In the late October article of mine, I had hoped to get around the copyright issue:

I won't try to post the video here (I still have it, though), because I don't want to get Examiner embroiled in a court fight over what the Brady Campaign would try to frame as a copyright issue. I think a "Fair Use" defense would have a pretty good chance--it is, after all, only 15 second excerpt from a video over 3 1/2 minutes long, but I can't drag Examiner into that.

I can, though, at least offer the audio [now disabled]. Who is promoting the "bliss" of ignorance now, Dennis? Alas, the Brady Campaign is claiming that even that infringes on their copyright, despite the fact that this would seem to pretty clearly fall under "Fair Use" protection.

Again, though, in the interest of not embroiling Examiner in a copyright infringement battle, I'll--for now, at least--forego trying to post video, or even audio, of Henigan's little editing job.

There is something, though, that I can do. At the same time the Brady Campaign put that video segment on YouTube and on their own website, they also posted the transcript, which faithfully quotes Henigan reciting the Second Amendment--minus "of the people." They took the transcript down, of course, at the same time they took the video down--but one Illinois gun blogger I read daily anticipated such behavior, and took a screen capture. Here it is, cropped down to the relevant portion:

Note also the amusing " . . . it is not legitimate for courts to edit the Constitution." Apparently, though, it is legitimate for the Brady Campaign to do so.

By the way, speaking of Brady Campaign hypocrisy and copyright infringement, we find yet another skeleton in the Brady closet. They don't exactly inspire a great deal of faith in their integrity, do they?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; brady; bradybrownshirts; bradycampaign; bradywatch; constitution; dennishenigan; donttreadonme; examiner; guncontrol; gunrights; liberalfascism; liberalism; rkba; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed; wethepeople

1 posted on 11/12/2009 10:42:09 AM PST by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Related

http://daysofourtrailers.blogspot.com/2007/11/erasing-second-amendment.html

http://www.examiner.com/x-2879-Austin-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m10d14-Brady-Campaign-violating-US-copyright-law

http://www.examiner.com/x-2581-St-Louis-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m10d26-Brady-Campaign-hypocrisy


2 posted on 11/12/2009 10:44:45 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Anti American, anti Freedom trash.

LLS


3 posted on 11/12/2009 10:46:50 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
With all due respect, this column has not been excerpted as per due diligent fair use copyright.

Unless the author or his/her agent has specifically negotiated reprint rights to specific entities, it is disrespectful to deny them the fruits of their creative labor.

We, the Freepers, must police ourselves or be policed by others.

Best regards,

4 posted on 11/12/2009 3:08:06 PM PST by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson