Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What I Have Learned From “Mad Men”: Now I Am Beginning To Understand
www.politicalcastaway.com ^ | 04 Nov 09 | Pitcairn

Posted on 11/04/2009 12:00:20 AM PST by Pitcairn

For many months now, many of my posts have been, admittedly, overly lamenting the on “loss” of American culture. As a member of Generation X, perhaps I have often been very overly vitriolic in my opinion that life is just not as it once was in America.

I recently watched my first few episodes of the series “Mad Men” on DVD. And the experience has been enlightening on my own view of American culture and cathartic of my own personal history.

I must say, I am coming to grips with my own political views. And my watching a TV show has never been as so meaningful as when I watched my first episode of “Mad Men.” My comparison is only as close as when watching my favorite TV shows as a child—most of which were reruns of 1960s classics.

This is not to say that “Mad Men” has transformed me into some born-again liberal. Far from it. But it has certainly helped in my understanding of the personal revulsion I have for modern-American culture. Here are my thoughts.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.politicalcastaway.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: america; correctness; culture; generationx

1 posted on 11/04/2009 12:00:21 AM PST by Pitcairn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

Dude...its a vanity.

What are your thoughts?


2 posted on 11/04/2009 12:04:30 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad, world.


3 posted on 11/04/2009 12:10:21 AM PST by period end of story (Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: period end of story

Sixties soap opera.


4 posted on 11/04/2009 12:11:27 AM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant

Edge of night.


5 posted on 11/04/2009 12:13:49 AM PST by period end of story (Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

Mad Men is a poor point of departure for such musings on the 60s because it portrays those times through the twisted imagination of liberals.

See:

What Mad Men Gets Wrong — The fifties, a decade of forgotten loyalty, honor, and patriotism

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2374073/posts

“No mystery there, since in its depiction of the fifties and early sixties, Mad Men faithfully reflects the dominant liberal view of that era as a time of rampant materialism, spiritless conformity, and reflexive bigotry. The corollary is that we were redeemed—liberated—not just by the civil rights movement but by the antiwar, feminist, and sexual-liberation crusades that followed. So ubiquitous is this view that its adherents can scarcely mention Ozzie and Harriet, Father Knows Best, or Leave It to Beaver, even in print, without sneering. Almost any graduate of today’s public schools will tell you, and plenty of their aging antiwar moms and dads will agree, that their grandparents were racist, sexist, and shockingly homophobic, and that’s before you even get to the hypocrisy that characterized their interpersonal relations.”


6 posted on 11/04/2009 12:38:37 AM PST by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Don't disagree. My one beef with the show is an apparent overblown characterization of the white men that star in it. If anything, the white male executives of that time had more honor and manners that the idiots of Generation Y and beyond that do not even know how to hold a folk and knife correctly.
7 posted on 11/04/2009 12:47:05 AM PST by Pitcairn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

The primary lesson to be taken from “Mad Men” is under NO circumstances is it good office policy to allow your secretary a joyride on a riding lawnmower.


8 posted on 11/04/2009 12:47:08 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

The only thing that “Mad Men” proves is that people will watch anything and think it means something. It’s a fantasy. Think FOR YOURSELF, for GOD’S Sake!
Right and wrong never changes. Good and evil never changes.
I haven’t watched a sitcom or a series except for sci-fi for over a decade. And even with sci-fi you got to watch for the agitprop.
Never watched idol, or any of that crap...because it’s CRAP. If you really think you can learn life lessons from a TV show, PLEASE eat lots of fish or some other brainfood and come away from your couch and in to the real world.


9 posted on 11/04/2009 12:48:12 AM PST by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1, 4 if by Thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn
Its fiction, not a documentary. You know, like a Michael Moore movie.
10 posted on 11/04/2009 2:35:05 AM PST by SampleMan (No one should die on a gov. waiting list., or go broke because the gov. has dictated their salary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn
Check Sir Barleycorn. Youngun', listen to those of us who were THERE in the 50s and 60s. Most of us were going to church every week, singing in the choir, EVERY Memorial Day and Labor Day EVERYONE in town turned out for the parade. We ALL knew someone personally who had suffered "over there" and we wanted them all to know how much we REALIZED how they had sacrificed and were appreciated. We happily recited the Pledge of Allegiance in elementary school and at my high school we all had to memorize, yes MEMORIZE, not just the Declaration of Independence, and not just the Preamble but THE WHOLE DAMN CONSTITUION. And that was by Christmas, we spent the rest of the year talking about what those documents meant and the reasons for the PRECISE wording of those documents. Those times were very different. That was what made the "Sixties" such a contrast. In ten years we went from a country where you married your high school sweetheart and settled down at the job you would have for the rest of you life, joined the church you got married in where you would have your funeral to "Why bother with marriage and a carreer when Suzie down the street will sleep with me whenever I want and in between I can get stoned and listen to the Beatles?" Of course, now we know what was wrong with that but it seemed pretty sweet at the time. So there you have it. It is OUR fault, but trust me the '50s were nothing like any TV show out of Hollywood in the last 40 years. "Leave it to Beaver" is probably the closest thing to what the reality was.

Μολὼν λάβε


11 posted on 11/04/2009 3:38:27 AM PST by wastoute (translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

I found “Mad Men” to be just another Soap Opera.


12 posted on 11/04/2009 3:43:13 AM PST by bmwcyle (We need more Joe Wilson's. OBAMA is ACORN ACORN is OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn

I remember when I was a kid in the mid-’60s. My favorite show was “Leave It To Beaver,” which at that time was only a few years out of production and in local reruns. As the younger of two boys in a family with both a mother and father, I clearly remember thinking that that show seemed exactly like my life. Sometimes, the embarrassing scrapes Beaver would get into would almost perfectly mirror problems I had in school (dealing with a bully, having to get up the courage to admit you broke a rule or a vase, etc.) They seem minor and laughable now, but to a kid, they were end-of-the-world problems, and I couldn’t get over how well that show understood my feelings. The writers really knew what it was like to see the world through the eyes of a kid.

Nowadays, “Leave It To Beaver” is usually only mentioned when some leftist snot sneers at Republicans that “Leave It To Beaver” America never really existed. That’s odd. It existed in my house, with its intact family, good moral values, and strict but loving parents. Maybe if it had existed in their houses, they wouldn’t have grown up to be such nasty, cynical, judgmental dillweeds.


13 posted on 11/04/2009 3:47:06 AM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitcairn
You are watching an admittedly fictional portrayal, ON TV, and think that you know something more than you did when you sat down to watch. That is the problem.

Read "Destructive Generation" by Collier and Horowitz, then, "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman and you will begin to understand.

14 posted on 11/04/2009 3:54:34 AM PST by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHFi

I think “Leave it to Beaver” is one of the best written shows ever.
The ear for kids dialogue is perfect. The small, but meaningful
situations are resolved in a touching, delicate manner.
I have found it almost Joycean in depiction of the time,
and it rings true to my own early childhood.


15 posted on 11/04/2009 5:03:18 AM PST by gussiefinknottle (woof!woof!woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson