Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gary Kreep To File 9 New Birther Lawsuits
For Goodness Sakes ^ | 10/16/09 | staff

Posted on 10/16/2009 11:04:20 AM PDT by pissant

Eight all at once and one separately. He’s not giving out details at this time, but says he has lawyers working on the briefs. Kreep has become much more outspoken about Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., even while not mentioning her name. He trashed the main complaint she wrote for their case Barnett v. Obama to hell, calling it “terrible,” at the mildest.

Andrea Shea King blog talk radio.

(Excerpt) Read more at ohforgoodnesssake.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; frivolouslawsuits; garykreep; larrysinclairslover; loserpays; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: SvenMagnussen

The power of positive thinking! I’m adding prayer.


21 posted on 10/16/2009 11:29:26 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: humble and shy; All
And then what? We’re stuck with Biden? Would there be a special election? I haven’t heard a definite answer to this question.

As anxious and eager as I am to see the Kenyan Usurper removed from office, I have to say that even IF Judge Carter were to rule that 0bama was not Constitutionally eligible to serve as POTUS, the very first thing that would happen would be an immediate appeal by Perkins Coie (0bama's law firm retained for the purpose of fighting these lawsuits) to the next highest court, and we can be sure that they will appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States, which has already proven that they are in the tank for Comrade 0bama.

I suspect that the only way 0bama is going to be removed from office is when Almighty God decides that it's time for 0bama to leave office.

And this Earth.
22 posted on 10/16/2009 11:37:46 AM PDT by mkjessup (Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Not if Judge Carter grants the MTD that was requested by the defense.


23 posted on 10/16/2009 11:38:00 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

~~PING

“Eight all at once and one separately. He’s not giving out details at this time, but says he has lawyers working on the briefs.”


24 posted on 10/16/2009 11:40:12 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jroneil
Constitutional Crisis Amendment 12 kicks in or new Elections or SCOTUS(most likely)

Twenty-fifth Amendment kicks in. Crisis averted.

25 posted on 10/16/2009 11:43:00 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
As anxious and eager as I am to see the Kenyan Usurper removed from office, I have to say that even IF Judge Carter were to rule that 0bama was not Constitutionally eligible to serve as POTUS, the very first thing that would happen would be an immediate appeal by Perkins Coie (0bama's law firm retained for the purpose of fighting these lawsuits) to the next highest court, and we can be sure that they will appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States, which has already proven that they are in the tank for Comrade 0bama.

The U.S. Attorney's Office are handling these.

26 posted on 10/16/2009 11:44:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Must not be holding out much hope for Barnett v. Obama.


27 posted on 10/16/2009 11:45:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Nine Lawsuits?

It is time that we in this country passed a law that would require that those who file lawsuits and lose, would have to pay the legal expenses of both litigants.

Loser Pays!


28 posted on 10/16/2009 11:47:14 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humble and shy
And then what? We’re stuck with Biden? Would there be a special election? I haven’t heard a definite answer to this question.

I don't know why you are so confused, the constitution is clear, the VP would take over. Biden was elected legally, even if Bozo was ineligible when he appointed him. Besides if we dumped Biden also we would get Pelosy or Hillery.

29 posted on 10/16/2009 11:49:19 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I assume you consider yourself a conservative, hence you’re presence on Free Republic. I’m curious why you (and a few others here) work so diligently AGAINST Obama having to prove he’s constitutionally eligible to be president? Why are you not curious yourself that so many people are willing to bring suit against him to prove something so crucial? Take Taitz out of the equation; why are SO many others willing to put themselves on the line to demand answers? Why does that bother you so?


30 posted on 10/16/2009 11:51:20 AM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01
I also would want to know the answers to your questions. Why would anyone not want President Obama to have to show his birth certificate? It would stop all this speculation. In fact, every single person who filed to run for the presidency should have to produce his original birth certificate.
31 posted on 10/16/2009 11:55:37 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

If obama loses in fed court based on evidence, I wonder what they would appeal? LoL!!! See what I mean? If it’s proven he’s inelligible, what could they appeal on? I can’t think of anything.


32 posted on 10/16/2009 11:56:52 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01; trumandogz
why does that bother you so?

And why show up on these threads 24/7 to defend Barry? What are you doing to help the truth come out?
33 posted on 10/16/2009 11:57:05 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: humble and shy
Doesn't mattah. Attack! Attack! ATTACK!
34 posted on 10/16/2009 11:57:12 AM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01

I simply stated that I believe that we need a national policy of Loser Pays where those who are on the losing end of lawsuits would have to pay the legal expenses of both or all litigants.

Therefore, if Gary Kreep is able to probe that Obama is ineligible to be president, Obama would have to pay all of Kreep’s legal expenses.

And if Kreep is unable to prove that Obama is ineligible, Kreep would have to pay all the legal expenses of Obama, the federal government as well as all others who he names as defendants.


35 posted on 10/16/2009 11:57:54 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ROTFLMAO!!!


36 posted on 10/16/2009 11:58:43 AM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I’ll agree to that, as long as you agree to allowing it to go to discovery.


37 posted on 10/16/2009 11:58:46 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The fact that taxpayer-funded government attorneys are being used to “defend” Barry from having to show normal documentation of birth and other records is (a) suspicious, and (b) a misuse of public money.


38 posted on 10/16/2009 12:00:26 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: humble and shy
Biden?

Biden might not be my favorite politician, but I have no doubt that he is an American, and that the interests of our country and its institutions come first in his heart.

I have more than doubts about the other guy.

ML/NJ

39 posted on 10/16/2009 12:08:13 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant; LucyT; All

If Kreep is wise, he's working off this "tip" from Judge Carter to derive Standing and Jurisdiction for his clients
(from the 10-05-08 WaveyDavey report):

CARTER then discussed the two-party system and viability of third-party candidates, and expressed that he thinks having the ability for third-party candidates is important, and then he said he still wants to know why no one has raised this issue.

40 posted on 10/16/2009 12:08:39 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson