To: Elderberry
Too many lawyer words! This is good, yes?
2 posted on
10/11/2009 1:35:37 PM PDT by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
To: Elderberry
I will donate to free republic today.I urge everyone to do the same. FREEDOM AIN’t FREE
check out oathkeepers.org
To: Elderberry
She needs someone who can translate her thoughts into English, it appears. A course in legal writing wouldn’t hurt, either.
12 posted on
10/11/2009 1:52:35 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: Elderberry; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ...
Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
13 posted on
10/11/2009 1:53:19 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: All
Seems simple enough ... From their last court date, Orly felt that Judge Carter had back-peddled a bit and was considering excusing himself from the battle through typical use of the "standing" issue we've seen over and over again.
I'm sure we all hope Judge Carter, former marine, isn't so devoid of a spine. But assuming for a moment he is ... something a good lawyer would do ... Orly prepared a filing to show that individual damages typically used to provide "standing" are unnecessary in the scope of public sector fraud. She even listed court cases to support this position. "We the People" have "standing".
Orly may not be the greatest of communicators --- let me rephrase that --- Orly is not the greatest of communicators, but this isn't brain surgery either. She made a good move. If nothing else, Judge Carter has a little more reading to do before he can tuck-tail-between-legs and beg off due to a lack of plaintiff standing.
21 posted on
10/11/2009 2:21:08 PM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Elderberry
26 posted on
10/11/2009 2:30:22 PM PDT by
Neets
(Go Yankees!!!)
To: Elderberry
If the Federal Courts can grant standing to plaintiffs who seek to remove a cross from a remote mountaintop in the Mojave Desert that is doing no harm to anyone, then Judge Carter should have no difficulty granting standing in this case.
28 posted on
10/11/2009 2:31:33 PM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Elderberry
Thanks for the post, Elderberry.
Sorry that a reasonable discussion of Orly’s latest filing won’t follow. Obama’s minions have already shut down this thread.
35 posted on
10/11/2009 2:40:04 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Elderberry
IMO we’re in need of a Coulter rule for legalese posts.
If one posts legal opinions one must also post a translation for the hoi palloi.
(I knew that I’d actually get to use that word someday!)
46 posted on
10/11/2009 2:50:53 PM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(3%)
To: Elderberry
RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) Act seems like a fitting vehicle to bring this home, considering the nature of Obama’s many Chicago associates. The requisite pattern of corruption is certainly there.
132 posted on
10/11/2009 5:34:17 PM PDT by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: Elderberry
214 posted on
10/11/2009 9:52:06 PM PDT by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
