Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.
During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l
Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election.
Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).
Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346.
It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense.
Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests.
Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing. Respectfully submitted, Sunday, October 11, 2009
OK then, it’s pretty plain that it doesn’t mean anything at all unless someone has an overactive imagination, simply isn’t thinking clearly, or is willfully blinded by their ideology.
A quick check of internet phone books shows that ‘Obama’ isn’t an uncommon surname. There’s even a few ‘Barack Obamas’ in the US.
A cursory check on Anywho.com gives six different ones in five different cities.
I’ve redacted the street addresses and phone numbers.
Barack Obama
San Antonio, TX 78207
Barack L Obama
Philadelphia, PA 19130
Barack S Obama
Springfield, IL 62701
Barack H Obama (snooty sounding address, could be the President’s old address)
Chicago, IL 60615
Barack Obama
West Hempstead, NY 11552
Barack Obama (different address)
Chicago, IL 60615
An Internet White Pages check also gives over two dozen returns for ‘Stan Dunham’ with both ‘Stan’ and ‘Stanley’.
As I alluded to before, if someone ran the same check on me, they’d see several people named ‘Mark Armstrong’ (17 in Oregon alone), and several with the same middle initial in the same cities at the same time, all with different SSN’s. If they chose to see this as some kind of proof that I was perpetrating identity theft, well then they’re simply not terribly bright.
So we’re back to one of the key reasons that fewer and fewer people are taking ‘Birthers’ seriously. They simply don’t seem to be able to get past their agenda to think rationally.
_____________________________
JB Williams
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.
(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..
Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
___________________________________
A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:
Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.
She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!
She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a ‘mail order’ attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our ‘great’ attorneys and ‘patriots’ who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.
So let’s get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots don’t need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. That’s why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.
HELP HER!
PayPal:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcChG5pRTOE&feature=player_embedded
What are you saying?
Couldn't some of the SS# be for zero's dad? Maybe some of these belong to him. Barack Sr went to Harvard didn't he? If I'm not mistaken, he lived in Sommerville or nearby.
If Stanley Ann could have a few SS#s then why couldn't her husband and children also?
You know, one thing any well trained attorney, debated, or mediator can do, is analyze a situation, and see it from many angles. That is why in debate, or mock trial, you don't get to pick the side the want to argue, and stick with that. You gotta be able to see both sides, so they make you prepare for, and argue, both sides.
That ability is a must for a litigator, because if you cannot see the case from your opponent's point of view, then you cannot anticipate, and refute, his arguments.
Birthers do not like Obama being President. If Omama actually was born in Kenya (no proof of that, apart from one contested, and since withdrawn, interpretation of the words of one very elderly Kenyan woman, and the fake-Kenyan-Birth-Certificate-of-the-month), and if the United States District Court had the power to remove the President of the United States from office (it doesn't), then the District Court could remove Obama from office for not being a natural born citizen. Therefore, Birthers, by definition, support Birtherism.
What you can never seem to fathom is that someone can be just as unhappy with Obama being President, and yet, after dispassionate analysis, conclude that the utter lack of proof makes the Birther idea moot, as does the fact that Congress, not the Courts, has the sole power to remove the President from office.
Because you cannot separate what you want, Obama out of office, from your lack of evidence, and the fact that the Courts could not do anything about it if Obama admitted he was not a citizen, you have to assume that anyone who points out that Birtherism is BS must want Obama to be President.
So, Ted Olson, Andrew McCarty, James Baker, Ed Meese, Free Republic's own Congressman Billybob, and every one of the 10 jillion ambitious Republican politician wannabes with law licenses are all on the take? Or all support Obama? Can you really highlight this paragraph, hit "reply" to this message, and the type "yes."
Oh, and as for why Obama won't release his personal data? There is an old saying in politics: never interrupt an opponent when he is making a mistake.
No, they are afraid of being called racists.
The one thing you apparently haven’t taken into account is the fact that We the People don’t check our beliefs to make sure they fall in line with whatever can be accomplished in the limited arena of a courtroom.
Don’t misunderstand—I’m not undermining the role of the justice system. I’m merely pointing out that the limitations of court—like being completely impotent when hard evidence is not in hand—are not the limitations of regular people in everyday life. Common sense often comes without written documentation.
That is to say, absolute reality is not defined by court rulings. This is not obvious to many who work in the justice system, but it should be contemplated once in a while.
So if we believe Obama has violated the Constitution, we will continue to speak out against such violation whether or not the court is competent to act on it.
apparently the comment came from one of his daughters in an interview...doesn’t like ice cream or sweets...
Fair enough. But don't just look on Birther threads. My posts on other subjects tend not to be so sarcastic. Or least the sarcasm isn't aimed at a fellow Freeper : )
Alright I’m going to say it anyway, since you’re not answering.
You just contradicted the entire argument of the antibirthers. It used to be that antibirthers were in the mainstream and birthers were fringe kooks.
Now you’re saying birthers are the conformists while antibirthers are cutting edge.
I got you. Your cover is blown. Turn in your namecard to the Eric Holder staff. You can no longer work as a troll here.
Let’s hope Judge Carter has gotten this and read it before he has made his final decision.
YES! That may may do some good. My whole objection to Birtherism, and its lawsuits, is that it is not just useless, it is counter productive. It takes anti-Obama time, money and energy, and channles it into an activity that not only will never remove Obama from office, but actively helps Obama, by allowing the White House, and Washington Post, to make Orly the leader of the anti-Obama movement.
Again, you are dead on accurate.
parsy, who says congrats!
I find it interesting that you appear to have accepted the fraudulent exhibits found ONLY on the Internet from Barry while rejecting what you feel is a fraudulent exhibit submitted to Carter’s court along with an affidavit. Additionally, it appears you care not a whit that the first exhibits Barry placed on the Internet as his proof of where he was born were clearly fraudulent. That lends a distinct tint/odor to your claims of objectivity.
Wanna steak dinner on me? At Mortons? Just post a link to a post of mine where I have said that I have reviewed anything Obama posted on the internet, and found it to be authentic.
My point is not that his documents aren't as fake as Orlys. My point is that it doesn't matter if they are. Period. You want to remove the Presidnet of the United States from office, you can impeach him, or call a Constitutional Convention and amend to Constutition, to allow for some other type of removal. Period.
Don’t feed the DoJ (Aporn) employees!!!
Yep. Two weeks ago Judge Carter was a "battle-hardened Marine, wounded at Khe Sanh, unafraid of that long-legged mack daddy from Chicago." Now the Birthers, contemplating the possibility of a dismissal, have taken to spinning that Judge Carter must've buckled under to Holder, been given an offer he couldn't refuse (despite that in the real world it's unlikely these two individuals have ever crossed paths).
How quickly things change!
Not to worry. Sometime next week after Judge Carter chucks this case Orly will find some other sucker willing to throw away their military career in a new filing and we'll be back to square one.
I hope you have the last laugh. You won’t. But I truly hope you do.
parsy, who promises to give you birthers a shoulder to cry on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.