Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.
During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l
Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election.
Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).
Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346.
It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense.
Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests.
Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing. Respectfully submitted, Sunday, October 11, 2009
It is fascinating to know that someone named Barack Obama lived in Texas and moved a couple of times. (4?) I wonder if this same guy may have moved to Utah? If there is someone else named Barack Obama in the country, we need to know about it.
parsy, who says this person may have violated the “Only One Person in A Country Can Have the Same Name Law”
It’s not like we’re searching for Bill Smith or Tom Jones here.
you forgot she has exposed parsifal as a lemming...
“What has she succeeded at to date?”
She forces trolls to respond to her. That’s right—forces.
trolls, who wouldn’t recognize an independent thought if it were verified by the Hawaii State Department of Health
IMO we’re in need of a Coulter rule for legalese posts.
If one posts legal opinions one must also post a translation for the hoi palloi.
(I knew that I’d actually get to use that word someday!)
There is no end to the people who criticize those who seek the truth.
He needs to take a trip out to the Mojave Desert to that remote mountaintop and seek some guidance. It’s not just who has standing in this case but who will be standing in the end before the God represented by that cross.
6. She has given the on-line diploma mill, William Howard Taft University a "most famous" alumni.
Wonder if they'll put her face on their brochure?
This is also fascinating:
Name - OBAMA, BERTRAND H
Gender - Male
Street Address - 11235 OAK LEAF DR APT 1720
City, State, Zip - SILVER SPRING MD 20901-1318
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 578-11-xxxx
Age - 44
Date of Birth - Jan, 1965
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified - Dec 95 - Feb 06
Name - OBAMA, BERTRAND H OBANG
Gender - Male
Street Address - 11235 OAK LEAF 1720 DR
City, State, Zip - SILVER SPRING MD 20901
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone - 301-345-0961 - EST
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 578-11-xxxx
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified - Sep 97 - May 04
Name - OBAMA, BERTRAND O
Gender - Male
Street Address - 11235 OAK LEAF DR APT 1720
City, State, Zip - SILVER SPRING MD 20901-1306
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 578-11-xxxx
Age - 45
Date of Birth - 1964
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified -
Wow, there is some guy named “Bertrand” Obama who lived in Maryland! Sarcasm aside, this is the problem with this crap. It’s CRAP. This is of no legal significance unless there is a link to BO. I guess one of Scotland Yards’ Finest ran some credit reports and anybody last-named “Obama” is our beloved’ president. This is an example of why Orly is a nut.
parsy, whose opinion of Scotland Yard just tanked
A legal opinion from me?
OK.
She says Don’t taze me Bro!
Don’t agree to the Motion to Dismiss!
He’s more reasons why the case needs to go forward!
Exactly. You'd have thousands of returns instead of just a few dozen.
While you're at it, look up phone listings for Han Solo and Obi Kenobi. Yes, many people legally change their names to those of celebrities.
It's gotten worse than mere static on the bc threads. The full-scale assault on open discussion now amounts to signal jamming by the Obots.
I saw a list like this on another thread’s link a few minutes ago. This one is easier to read. Why don’t the birther guys whittle it down some. We can probably eliminate “Betty” in Connecticut.
This is the problem. Orly is tossing undifferentiated garbage into the proceedings. The Scotland Yard guy is probably just some fruitcake who ran a skip trace program thru credit bureaus. Any real “investigator” would have eliminated some of this garbage first.
parsy, who says Orly must have some innate desire to be tossed out of court
I can’t speak for the other “trolls,” but I enjoy responding to Orly’s freak show antics. She doesn’t have to force me.
Independently, each of us arrived at the same conclusion - that Orly is a putz.
Wow, it’s curious that his mom had multiple SS#’s too.
Why would she do that?
Welfare fraud maybe?
Are there any other Barack Obama’s in the U.S. That would account for some of the multiple SS#’s.
Crap like? Like Parsy posts. This info wasn’t just pulled out of Obama’s @%$.
Many thanks for your helpful responses.
I notice in some of the holdings, Stanley Ann is listed as a male. Perhaps that was just clerical workers making assumptions based on the name.
Irony. "Independent thought" on a Birther thread is what gets people labeled "trolls".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.