Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.
During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l
Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election.
Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).
Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346.
It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense.
Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests.
Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing. Respectfully submitted, Sunday, October 11, 2009
I think you don’t know the difference between fact and your opinion.
I think it's a fact that the judge will not consider it.
I’m also old enough to remember when conservatives had a sense of humor.
It served us well. Perhaps we should give it another try, if we could just stop quivering with rage at the thought that someone, somewhere, might disagree with us.
Thank you, Starwise. Now that the sign has officially been posted, I’ll discontinue feeding the resident trolls. ;-)
It’s not right to insult Lady Gaga like that, that’s mean. LOL!
Heck no! If she messed up I would have to sue her. It would take a lifetime. But it says something about a dentist who get a law degree so she can represent her self in malpractices suits.
parsy, who still has most of his teeth
An Orly Cruise? OMG, people would be jumping overboard not to have to listen to her. They would change the cry to “Man Orlyboard! Man Orlyboard!”
parsy, who would just stay drunk on the Orly Cruise
Amen! And a desire to debate issues rather than run crying to the moderator. Heck, its thru disagreement that you either correct yourself, or learn how to defend your ideas better, and help the other guy.
parsy, who is serious about the ex-birther support group thing, cause these guys are going to crash and they will need us
The truth is indisputable. Obama is hiding records. As for the birth certificate, I don’t know and never claimed to know. Stop blurting impulsive, clueless inaccuracies. It blights your record.
parsy, who would rather be a high-level, outed troll than a second-rate one with his secret identity intact
The leftists are desperate to mock conservatives using Orly Taitz as a model. Yet, Taitz goes on with her fight and conservatives continue to gain national momentum. And stop crying.
Non-Seqwy, who doesn’t understand conservatives well enough to know how to apply Alinsky’s tactic #4.
I’m not playing the victim. I ignore all of the name calling, the troll accusations, and all of the other BS that you and your pathetic group of paranoid freaks dish out. But I said I won’t tolerate your bringing the condition of my soul into your bag of parlor tricks. You know nothing about my personal relationship with Christ. So knock it off. It’s against FR policy.
From: parsifal
To: Orly:
“Stop blurting impulsive, clueless inaccuracies.”
Your obedient servant,
parsy
Knock off the personal attacks.
LOL!!! Sometimes I get so wound up I am up til to 3:00 am.
parsy, who is trying to chill
My point was that JimRob has defended a couple of the alleged trolls as having been in on the ground floor of establishing FR’s credibility.
***Yes, that’s true and IIRC he has defended Star Traveller on that very same basis. But long term standing doesn’t have bearing on whether one is an issue-specific troll. Lotsa Evos, Tootyfruityrudyites, and others.
I think 0bama will be out within a year.
***I think he’s got too much librul weight behind him. If we couldn’t get Clintoon when it was proven he was a perjurer, we’ll have trouble getting this to stick. Not that I think we should give up. The way I see it, if he’s supposedly hiding something embarrassing rather than outright ineligibility, then it’s all green lights from here, we may not end up with pay dirt but it won’t be worthless.
Check out this thread - especially the last two pages - and tell me he won’t be out in a year.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2359747/posts?q=1&;page=201
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.