Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.
During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l
Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election.
Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).
Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346.
It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense.
Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests.
Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing. Respectfully submitted, Sunday, October 11, 2009
Re 15-— worried this issue will finally reach discovery?
I know a few freepers who are not interested in this subject, for whatever reason. What do they do? They ignore these threads and concentrate on the topics that they are important and noteworthy.
Anyone who continually flings s*** on these threads is either seriously psychologically impaired, or an 0bama tool. But I repeat myself.
If any of you had any kind of experience in court, you would know how hard it is to make a case especially when there are formidable opponents.
I have seen things in court that are so unbelievable in court so as to disgust you beyond your limits. Perjury is a given where the judge does nothing. You could have the murder weapon, video of the murder, witnesses of the murder and still not win. This is not an exception. This is now the rule.
The way to win in court is with money and power regardless of the truth.
What has Orly accomplished? It is really so simple and clear that you have no understanding of her situation. She is going up against the American government and the executive branch of the United States of America. You clearly are ignorant of what that means. The fact that she has gotten this far is a testament to her talents and her grit. You have no idea how hard it is to move the case along to where it is now. None.
She is going up against so much power and corruption and you have the gall to say that she has no accomplishments. What she has accomplished is monumental. Unfortunately, when you try to explain all this to people who do not understand the court system and how hard it is to move a case along, it is like trying to explain to a child how hard it is for an adult to make a living for that child.
No matter how much you try to knock her down, you will knock yourself down twice as hard. That is inevitable.
Question marks do not make a legal case. I don’t know BO’s past. Maybe he had more than one ss card. BUT, if someone is going to take him to court, they have to have more than that and they can not just string together piles of stuff without it having some relevancy.
Birthers here would do better to divide the names up by state and let freeper birthers in each state try to run down the names and addresses. Go to libraries and check out criss cross directories.
Then if there is something to this, there isn’t all the distracting non-relevant stuff for people to go thru. Birthers are better off with 3 or 4 proven relevant facts than a mass of stuff.
Plus, imagine if you birthers had posted a lot of threads and gone further down the Stanley Dunham road...You would have been out on a limb and DU or KOS or somebody would have chopped it off behind you.
Another thing. You birthers are calling several of us trolls and what not, but I notice most of us anti’s come together on the threads having to do with Orly. I suspect some are attorneys and their amusement is at the complete wreck Orly has made of all of this. But, you birthers ought to pay some attention because you are getting perspective from people who do this for a living. They can keep you from going down some dead end paths and then you can spend your time on more productive possibilities.
parsy, who is sincere about this
You realize that can be said the other way around? How many times have I seen birthers write things over and over that have been debunked countless times? Pretty much the entire birther thesis falls into that category.
to read later...
Ah.... troll number two. No cookies for you. Back under your bridge.
There are substantial number of different addresses used by a Barack Obama and this SS # that was run. Every address shown is in the Chicago, Illinois area.
a few of them are listed as (possible high risk) which may mean not reliable..I don't know that database. Several old phone numbers are also listed.
regards
rs
The way to win in court is with money and power regardless of the truth.
So Orly can’t win... Point made, thank you.
Well stated.
In similar vein to what you said, if someone has advocated every possible anti-birther angle since before the election, you have to ask yourself, what are they still getting out of it, if not a paycheck?
Maybe it helps to quiet "the voices"?
Come on mlo, you know the anti-birthers have been wrong 100% of the time. Not a single case has been dismissed as predicted by the anti-birthers. Orly has gotten further than anyone else . . . or is it that she is slower than anyone else . . . taking so long to properly serve the defendants that she is finally getting to the motion to dismiss, several months behind the pack.
Orly has the support of hundreds of thousands of people. The only way the government can succeed is by keeping people in the dark. They are failing.
The government cannot win in these circumstances. Additionally, it is obvious that with so many people on this thread pontificating that Orly is so inept tells us that there are many, many shills on this forum.
Those of you who are in love with your own opinions armchair quarterbacking cannot succeed in knocking her down. You will lose sleep over it and even make yourselves sick trying to knock her down but you will be hurting yourselves in the process.
Those of you who are in love with your own opinions armchair quarterbacking cannot succeed in knocking her down.
Okay coach..... You in love with your opinions?
But this address below sticks out. Obama's Somerville address while he went to Harvard.
"Name - OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
Gender - Male
Street Address - 365 BROADWAY APT B1
City, State, Zip - SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 042-68-xxxx
Age - 119
Date of Birth - 1890
Deceased - No"
The same that PI Susan Daniels signed an affidavit of Obama using the social security number of a dead man.
Susan Daniels signed affadavit confirming Obama used deceased man's SS#
I don’t want to nitpick but she only said the number was associated with someone born in 1890 not that he was dead...that number is not in the SS Death Index, if it was I would request that persons application for a SS number. The 1890 could be wrong and again it could be right. The only name shown on her database search associated with that ss number seems to be Obama’s. Exhibit of the case shows more details.
Agreed. I was about to jump off this thread as yet another typical waste of reading, at the time I saw your post.
That is precisely their objective and unfortunately, they are always allowed to accomplish their mission here, with no recourse.
Time to jump off now. I haven't the time nor patience for wading through obfuscation and idiocy.
Thanks for posting this...what about the whole expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels? Is this archived on www.scribd.com?
Don’t forget Sankey Investigations 100 plus job entities found of Obama and Michelle’s in databases (listed here under all the phony addresses they have set up for racketeering scheme):
http://defendourfreedoms.org/letterHolder.htm
Thanks. Yes it looks strange. Here’s the problem. We do not know what this came from. My GUESS would be a telephone account based on the “Telephone Accountholder” slot. The social security number and age could be from the owner of the apt who might have provided the phone? It could be a computer glitch? It could be a phony id gotten by BO.
Ownership of the apartment would be something I would look at. If the birthdate is 1890, and BO went to college at 18, that would have been about 1980, so the age would have been 90ish not 120ish. So this item was run on something that is picking up old records and that seems to be how you get the 119 year age. 2009-1890 =119. So it is not a contemporaneous record of the time BO went to school there.
parsy, who again says this stuff should have already been investigated
A decade or so ago, part of my job was to advice several "traffic court/small claims court" judges in Texas. Because they heard only Class C Misdemeanors, punishable by fine only, they did not have to be attorneys. One faxed me 20 or so pages of gibberish filed by a Militia of the Republic of Texas type, and said in exasperation: "I've been reading this stuff for six hours, and I still can't understand it." I told him: "Judge, that is a good thing, because it doesn't make any sense. If it starts to make sense to you, its because you are going nuts too."
Having a "reasonable discussion" about Orly's legal version of Star Trek technobabble presupposes that there is reason in her arguments. There is not.
But there may be method to her madness. Asking the judge to take judicial notice of this sort of thing will not only not happen, but it will pi$$ off the judge, for wasting his time. If you want to lose spectacularly big, if you want to be chastised by the court, if you want to be sanctioned, so that you can blog to your deluded followers that your loss is just more proof that you, and they, are the victims of a gigantic conspiracy, well Orly is playing her cards just right.
No. Like every other birther thread it will go to a thousand replies.
parsy, who is starving because everybody thinks he is a troll and refuses to share food
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.