Skip to comments.
JUDGE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES! JUST NOT...
jaghunters ^
| 9/22/2009
| jaghunters
Posted on 09/22/2009 4:24:26 PM PDT by rxsid
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
1
posted on
09/22/2009 4:24:26 PM PDT
by
rxsid
To: Red Steel; null and void; LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; MHGinTN; pissant; hoosiermama; Amityschild; ...
2
posted on
09/22/2009 4:24:53 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
3
posted on
09/22/2009 4:26:11 PM PDT
by
GOP Poet
To: rxsid
That’s not what the judge’s order says (it’s at the link).
To: rxsid
5
posted on
09/22/2009 4:27:12 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
6
posted on
09/22/2009 4:27:27 PM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(America is at that awkward stage..2 late 2 work within the system, but 2 early 2 shoot the bastards)
To: rxsid; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...
Translation ?? Positive ?
7
posted on
09/22/2009 4:27:39 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: rxsid
Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?
8
posted on
09/22/2009 4:27:53 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: rxsid
To: rxsid
Er, I read the linked document and it says nothing like what the article says.
10
posted on
09/22/2009 4:31:17 PM PDT
by
dinodino
To: Lurking Libertarian
Yeah, I’m not sure I agree with his interpretation.
11
posted on
09/22/2009 4:32:13 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
OK.
What does this all mean in idiot’s terms
12
posted on
09/22/2009 4:33:11 PM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
To: Dianna
"Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?"
Official by whom? The 5th Amendment? Or, the 1940's judicial rule?
13
posted on
09/22/2009 4:33:23 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
OK, I need a summation of what this is all about.
To: Dianna
Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?
A Ggrand Jury does not have to be convened through the judicial system to be official. That is a big myth perpetrated by the judicial system since the mid 1940's.
15
posted on
09/22/2009 4:33:37 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
To: STARWISE
I think it means, it will proceed if another court will take it.
16
posted on
09/22/2009 4:35:57 PM PDT
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: rxsid
It doesn't say that. It says it will "reconsider its July 2 order denying the Super American Grand Jury leave to file "presentments"...motion for reconsideration is granted...should the fee be tendered the "presentments" will be dismissed
as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States. I am so sorry, but there is no way to interpret that to say that it grants any "recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse..."
17
posted on
09/22/2009 4:37:14 PM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: roaddog727
Good evening roaddog727!
Well, to be sure...I'm not. From what I can tell at this point (a non attorney's point of view), it looks like:
1)The judge GRANTED their leave to file their presentments (i.e. accusations) and therefor "recognizing" them and their right to file the presentments.
and
2)The judge followed up by essentially saying his court is not the proper jurisdiction.
18
posted on
09/22/2009 4:38:18 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: roaddog727
OK. What does this all mean in idiot’s termsA group of people got together, without any official standing, and called themselves a "grand jury," and voted to charge Obama with all sorts of crimes. They then took their phony "presentment" to a real court, which told them they couldn't file it because they aren't a real grand jury. They then moved for reconsideration and the judge said, "OK, you can file it if you pay the filing fee, but I will then dismiss it as soon as you file it, because you're still not a real grand jury."
In the Bizzaro-world of the Birthers, this passes for a "victory."
To: rxsid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
