Posted on 09/20/2009 4:30:50 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/09/orly-taitz-flock-shootin.html
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2009 Orly Taitz Flock Shootin'
I have not dealt a great deal with the lawyers and their cases concerning Bearick Obama, as in analysis none of them have produced anything, and none of them has proceeded in ways which would set cases to leverage the exact Obama documents sought.
It is like if you wanted a date with a person who was ignoring you. You don't keep after the person who says, "NO", you instead find another person who is interested to help you make the person envious. That is why I stated that tax cases etc... would be how to get Obama's records and would have by now.
In that attorney Orly Taitz is what hunters would call a "flock shooter". She has just loaded up her gun, pulled both barrels and poured lead in a flock of birds to see if she could hit something. She has wasted a great deal of lead in this in trusting judges to work for her when the correct method has always been to do the work and make the court law work against the judge, so he has to work for you.
Whether by flock shooting, or if Mrs. Taitz has figured this hunt out, she has now the opportunity to blow the Obama hidden information wide open due to the arrogance of a federal judge named, Clay Land, down south.
Land has been an ass in this to a Soldier, named Capt. Connie Rhodes, who was questioning being deployed illegally. He has in prejudice which has been correct in accusing Orly Taitz of being a John Edwards ambulance chaser for fame. That though should never be a reason to deny a Soldier their concerns and to protect that United States Citizen.
Judge Land though went ballistic in firing a nasty ruling at Orly Taitz and threatening her with sanctions. The good part is now that Mrs. Taitz either I said by blunder, stupidity, arrogance or planning has walked right into a situation which is about to trap Land in his own rulings.
See Land has now gone berserk as he was already on a short fuse as Taitz has jerked his cord good in basically accusing him of being a shill for Obama politics and it got Land so furious he has read "treason" into the Taitz reply concerning him. So much so that he has levied a ten thousand dollar fine on the platinum blonde.
This is where the spit hits the fan now, because there are numerous precedents which are basic common law in when someone is accused and punished as Mrs. Taitz is about to, that she will now have a hearing and appeal by higher authorities where she can demand now the Obama secret papers to defend herself.
That was the happening earlier this year when another judge named James Robertson tried to bitch slap an 82 year old lawyer named John Hemenway, with fines over an Obama case. This was the infamous "Twitter" clause Robertson quoted as Obama was legal because he read it on Twitter. Attorney Hemenway was no fool and fired back in reply and appeal that the minute he was sanctioned with threats of fines, Hemenway then had full right of disclosure of all Obama papers to defend himself.
Robertson's testicles shriveled up at that one and simply reprimanded Hemenway, but Hemenway is on appeal and the courts don't know what to do with the case obviously as Hemenway has his precedents and rights to Obama's records now.
This is where Orly Taitz has now plunged into.
If she plays this correctly, she can do what John Hemenway did and more in demanding full disclosure of Obama's papers to defend herself and her client.
Clay Land in his arrogance has blundered this immensely for the Obama cause and Mrs. Taitz should utilize Mr. Hemenway's reply along with something of Land being part of the old boys network protecting Obama on top in thinking all women should be tied to the bed post, barefoot and pregnant, like Obama tried to hang around for the fun sex and then dumped the kids on Muchelle.
Bring Muchelle into this, Obama and feminism, and see Clay Land really gulp before and Olbermann volcano goes off or he runs for the woods.
It would make great fodder for the press to have this all fester and Clay Land have to prove that his ruling was not against American women alone, because where else in Judge Land's rulings has there ever been such a diatribe against a flashy male attorney?
One can never get their hopes up as there has been nothing to hope for, but there is a golden goose now if Orly Taitz places her Russian ammunition correctly in demanding her defense using Obama's records and placing this now in the feminist center for American women, Attorney Orly Taitz and Capt. Connie Rhodes in being attacked by the Old Obama Club.
Let the fun begin. Judge Clay Land slings a scoop of it, you bring a manure spreader load to the contest.
agtG 246
The Constitution is not a dictionary. It has become a fashion — of a law perverting sort — to add a small dictionary of sorts to legislation, so that words that are are well-understood may be redefined into some perversion of that popular meaning. This allows politicians and public figures to make a claim related to the public perception, where the law is something else entirely.
Such follies make enforcement of law arbitrary, inscrutable, Kafka-esque and breed contempt for the ideal of being a lawful person in a society ruled by law.
WOW, JustaDumbBlonde, I was asking you, apart from your French language, how well do you commands other foreign language???
Enough about me ... do you want to discuss Orly Taitz' legal skills, or continue to deflect?
With all due respect, if you want to make the statement that the POTUS is not qualified, and use the Constitution as the basis for your contention, you're going to have to do better than "the Constitution is not a dictionary."
If that is the case ... your question has absolutely nothing to do with this thread and, quite frankly, is none of your business.
De Vattel’s The Law of Nations.
I would have preferred the observed success of her legal skills over a number of the immature or lazy lawyers I had the misfortune of having to had dealt with. What she lacks in grammar and proof-reading ability she more than makes up for in energy and persistence.
It makes for better debate if you can or will actually support your statements in the thread. As it stands, you haven’t seen fit to respond with any specificity whatsoever.
That's a book. It's not an appendix to the Constitution. Everything that book says is not law.
The statement that Obama is a illegitimate usurper is very specific.
What is law, in your opinion?
I agree, let’s keep our focus.
I read somewhere that in the end the judge decided not to do the sanctions. I just can’t remember where I read it exactly.
It would be nice if you could prove it, but you can’t, so you argue in circles. Works for some, I suppose. Enjoy your evening.
Whoa! I have proven it. I would hope that the truth I see is the same as that which you see, but that is not so now.
What is absent in is a full hearing under due process in a court able to make a ruling in accordance with fact and law.
To expand on my last, please understand that usurpation is a method by which the lawful process is ignored, shunted out, short-cutted. This is a usurpation.
There is de facto and de jure. Obama is President de facto but not de jure. That is the very nature of a usurper of office, in that a usurper holds and wields office as a matter of practical fact, but not within the bounds and metes of the law.
He just did it Friday. I can't see him changing his mind until today at the earliest.
How do we know it was a "blunder"? Just sayin.
Non-Seq:
this one, #23, is just perfect for some of the huckleberries on here. Apparently, the usual $200/hour fees have been waived ... pro bono.
cPete, who just cannot possibly take this place as seriously as parsy does
Well, Parsy is a self-declared Democrat. He also must have access to Zero’s documents to make that bold claim. C’mon, Parsy, let’s see the long form.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.