Taitz Files Emergency Stay and Motion for Rehearing

The Post and Email ^ | 9/17/09 | John Charlton

[pissant]

Good

[NowApproachingMidnight]

Go get ‘em.

[pissant]

ping

[wintertime]

If Captain Rhodes fully complies with her military orders in every way can she request the military courts to review the legitimacy of her orders?

[pissant]

I doubt it.

[LucyT]

.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

the evidence objected to by Land, concerning Social Security Numbers was gathered by a famous detective of Scotland Yard

There's those pesky SSNs again. And, the result of a Scotlnad Yard (MI5?) investigation, to boot.I'm really curious about those...maybe more than the LF/BC.

[deport]

First she accuses Chief Justice Roberts of allowing criminal activities to be ongoing in the SCOTUS and now she’s deriding this Judge... The outcome at some point is going to be interesting if she continues.

[pissant]

I’m surprised she didn’t beat the judge about his ears for the language in his BS decision.

[Fred Nerks]

This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation.

A monumental statement.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

It's hard to imagine any “conspiracy theory” being easier to disprove, than the questions about BHO’s Constitutional qualifications for office. That's why I lend it credence.

Perhaps, it didn't start out as a conspiracy. It's entirely possible that BHO, acting alone, chose to falsify his “natural born” citizen status.

However, as this drags on, more and more people are at least guilty of willful nonfeasance, for insisting on a proper vetting. These people aren't “conspirators”; but, they could be enabling a conspiracy.

Of course, if BHO is actually qualified for his Office, then there has been no conspiracy — unless, it's a conspiracy to play rope-a-dope with the “birthers”.

The release of one, simple, original government-issued document would settle the matter.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

"for insisting on a proper vetting. " -- should be: "for not insisting on a proper vetting." Oops!

[Outlawales]

keep at em, eventuallly , the house of cards will fall

[deport]

If the following is any indications she was trying to box his ears. From another post on the following linked thread: Click to read

Here are three examples of what Rhodes alleged in her latest brief:

• WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Captain Connie Rhodes asks and requests this Court retract and vacate its sarcastic and biting dismissal of September 16, 2009,...

• By its contradictory and condescending tone, the Court...

• ...suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate “chain of command” alleged above... Someone needs to ring the bell and let the combatants get it on.

[parsifal]

With all due respect to my fellow freepers, this is an example of how hard it is to pursue a frivolous lawsuit in court. Judges will do these kinds of things to you.

parsy, who says remember this the next time you start hollering about frivolous claims in malpractice tort issues

[pissant]

Pissy, Parsi kneepad for Obama long time

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[Lurking Libertarian]

A monumental statement.

One that could get her disbarred.

[Robert DeLong]

Judge Clay D. Land was nominated by President George W. Bush on September 21, 2001, to a seat vacated by J. Robert Elliot. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on December 13, 2001, and received his commission on December 21, 2001.

Something is truly up with this for so many to participate in this cover up.

[Sola Veritas]

Well Judge Land rule on this new motion? If so, what good is it. Shouldn’t it be seen by another judge to at least give the appearance of impartiality?