Posted on 09/10/2009 8:48:46 AM PDT by opentalk
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.” Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I tried to locate the other threads and only came up with what I posted before and this which includes reference to DNC Convention requirements of Candidates:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2140156/posts
I previously posted the Hawaii docs THAT INCLUDE the certification signed by Pelosi.
My memory was that the qustion was resolved, Hawaii alone would show why two documents. The other question is why two instead of using the broader one with the certification in all 50 states? To lessen the number of charges of perjury if found untrue? (speculation) When investigating this before one thought was to go check the notary book of the notary and see in what order or if the two similar documents were identified . Since they were on the same day they should be on the same page in the notary book.
It would also be helpful to see past nominations/certifications to see if there were any differences say from 2004 and John F’n
I was in Vietnam Kerry’s documents submitted.
In another thread I did find where in Arizona Obama declared himself to be a Natural Born Citizen, no equivocation.
Here is some info on Secretary of State’s denial of requirement that they check eligibility etc
A lot of correspondence to SOS’s here blog on right side of page goes back to 2008:
http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/2008/12/nancy-pelosi-and-john-boehner.html
I have not located info from California Sec of
State and may have to request it.
good luck, personally I don’t see a smoking gun yet, but should 2004 nomination docs include certification on all 50 that would be damming if they changed 2008 for all but Hawaii. We need to get legislation to prevent this from happening again.
Ping for more info on Obama certification by dems.
I see the smoking gun that you don’t see.
A couple days ago, O’s lawyers file to dismiss. Why didn’t they attach as evidence certified proof? Would kill this issue dead in it’s tracks.
If he’s qualified, and he has proof, he’s a very irresponsible man.
If he’s not qualified, he’s a criminal.
Let’s get past this.
I see the smoking gun that you don’t see.
I was referring to the smoking gun on Pelosi, two different letters concerning DNC nominee Obama, one with “cert” and the other without.
The whole controversy is over Obamas refusal to prove eligibility among other things.
Since the states rely upon the parties to vet their candidates, this means that the Secretaries of State of all these states approved the results of the election without verification from the DNC in writing. They have some splainin to do as well.
To quote Ed Vieira, "if he knew he was not a Natural Born Citizen. . it was a perjured oath." Now the he is THEY and they're all going down for Perjury!
This story needs to get out to everyone but I suspect a "more important" story will take the headlines in the MSM - just like what happened every time it seemed Bill Clinton was on the ropes and going down for the count!
Yeah, unfortunately, I was already aware of the ACORN/GPS thing allegedly for the census. I don’t buy the reasoning and, as with EVERYTHING Obama, I am concerned with what he plans to do with the information.
With respect to the story under discussion, I did receive a copy of the second (fraudulent) eligibility statement that Obama’s presidential campaign filed with the SoS in Virginia and it is the fraudulent one that omits the legal statement. Adds a lot of credibility to the story.
I'm not sure anyone realizes just how important FR has become. The connections are worked out here & the findings (along with source documentation [bec Freepers are attacking their work so professionally] are filtering up the chain to a larger or more visible entities willing to go public with the info. What also happens is that mid-tier sources start the ball rolling & Freepers pick it up, expand & enlarge & connect the dots; then mid-tier sources pick up the ball again and report their breaking news.
This is nothing new on FR, An army of intelligent, pro-active, Constitution-loving citizens have been pooling their collective knowledge and expertise here since the beginning. What is new is how organized Freepers have become and how starved the public is for TRUTH.
Freepers are generally selfless regarding their work. Often, very often, the research is so collaborative it is impossible to distribute credit --- Freepers working as one organism.
But where we can, giving credit where credit is due is just plain just.
Freepers will never know if they saved our country, but they will never forget that they responded when their country sent out an SOS.
And Freeper wit. the best!!!
Hear! Hear!
Great post!
STE=Q
Here is a real eye-opener for ya!
There are now going to be lawsuits coming out about election fraud. It seems the DNC first signed their traditional form to certify a candidate but then signed another version.
The second version of the DNC’s certification for the offices of President and Vice President differed by only having one line deleted...
Guess which line was deleted?
The line saying that the candidates were “eligible under the Constitution” was deleted. And this is the version that they mailed to ALL 50 States.
Why would Nancy Pelosi and the DNC do this?
So for a story that wont die two very BIG new stories have come out in the past couple weeks:
Anti-Birthers can no longer claim that Obama is not fighting this case. He is now using DOJ lawyers at the taxpayers expense to fight this case.
Also now we know that the DNC sent a second version of the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” which excluded signing off on any claim that Obama was Consitutionally elgible to be President.
The version of the document that the DNC mailed out to ALL 50 States was missing the following text, and I quote;
“- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Why would they redo the document and remove this line?
Because they want to be fitted for rope neckties by the flickering light of burning torches.
What???
The British Are Coming???
Far worse than the British are coming, are here, and have captured our capital. The reprisals against the usurper and the enablers will be monumental.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.