Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama's birth certificate - a fan replies
Electric Lawyer ^ | July 26, 2009 | Grace Suarez, esq.

Posted on 07/26/2009 5:35:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Okay, so maybe fan isn't the right word, since she starts her comment by saying, "You don't know what you're talking about." But this is her argument:

"What Obama posted was a 2007 computer printout of a "Certificate of Live Birth" (the "COLB"). The information on the COLB was allegedly based on the facts contained in his original 1961 birth certificate. In November 2008, various state officials claimed that they personally examined the original to verify the COLB.

However, the original has NEVER been released. And just yesterday, Hawaii official changed their story when they told CNN researchers that all original birth certificates had been destroyed in 2001 when the state went paperless. So their claim that they verified' the information in the COLB against the original in 2008 was a lie. They just made up the information. But if they do still have the original like they claimed last year, then they are now lying about its existence so they don't have to release it and let the truth come out."

Okay. The bottom line is that, because Hawaii's records were digitized and then destroyed, there is no paper birth certificate or certificate of live birth (same thing) documenting Mr. Obama's birth. So what? Millions of vital records have been and/or are being scanned and destroyed. Probably even more have been destroyed in fires and natural disasters. Are the "birthers" (apparently the popular name -- so much nicer than wacko) saying that if you don't have a paper birth certificate you can't be President? If so, it should apply to everyone applying for a driver's license, Social Security, etc. Yet hundreds of thousands of people don't have birth certificates, and hundreds of thousands more will not have them as paper records are phased out. Should they be denied their rights?

My correspondent also reports that McCain was also sued about his birthplace, and tells me to stop playing the race card. Well, if it's not race, what is it? A hatred of digitized records? Or a genuine, heartfelt belief, despite all the evidence, that Obama was born in Kenya? What evidence is there of that? Please, people, let's move on and deal with things happening now, like the economy and health care. We're not killing trees in this debate (at least not here) but we are wasting time. I for one am thoroughly convinced Mr. Obama was born in America, and actually I don't care, since the whole reason for the native-born requirement was to keep Alexander Hamilton from becoming President.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; eligibility; hawaii; ineligible; kenya; naturalborn; naturlborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; racism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Wasn't Alexander Hamilton(1755-1804), born before the Constitution was ratified, and therefore immune from that provision? Geez, you'd think a lawyer would be well-read enough to know that! Must be one of those "wise Latinas" we keep hearing about lately.
1 posted on 07/26/2009 5:35:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

amen!!!


2 posted on 07/26/2009 5:36:50 PM PDT by bareford101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
For evidence, how about the GRANDMOTHER stating that she was at the birth in Kenya. That doesn't make anyone question?

And if this particular clause of the Constitution just isn't important, which one is next? The 1st Amendment? The 14th? Maybe we think those aren't important and then what?

3 posted on 07/26/2009 5:40:56 PM PDT by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ping for later


4 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:08 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hawaii destroyed all legacy documents? Really?

That's nuts! Destroying legacy documents does not make sense. I do not believe it any more then I'd believe

Headline?

Constitution scanned onto computer file.
No Need For Constitution In Original Paper Form
"We're going paperless," says U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Nearly all U.S. historical document destroyed

5 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yesterday someone posted that Andrew Jackson was born elsewhere. (He wasn’t) and it wouldn’t have mattered anyway since he was here before the constitution was ratified. (he fought in the revolution and was even a POW of the british)

Somebody is desperately throwing chaff into the air.


6 posted on 07/26/2009 5:45:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The lying lies, and the lying liars who lie.

Why aren't the Hawaiian officials being held accountable?
1961 - something happens somewhere that was notable to someone. Fast forward to 2007 - they use a document or record (???) that documented something that happened in 1961 and printed some kind of verification. But, in 2001, all the records were destroyed, so what the HELL was reviewed in 2007 to create the computer-generated document in circulation now? How stooopid do they think we are? /rhetorical

7 posted on 07/26/2009 5:46:52 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Please, people, let’s move on
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

“Let’s move on”....?????

Hm?...Where did I hear this before? Oh! Yes! With Monica Lewinsky and her blue dress.


8 posted on 07/26/2009 5:47:13 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bareford101

Well then. Cant these Sotomayor-wanna be explain Executive Order 13489 which Obama signed on his 1st day of office ?

“Sec.2

Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records

When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines providied by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.”

Now for all of you who commented on our previous articles that we were no more that right-wing nut jobs, that this thing about Obama’s birth certificate was a non-issue, and those of you who tried to shift the focus of the stories, doesn’t this strike you as just a little odd?

http://www.infowars.com/obama-signs-executive-order-barring-release-of-his-birth-certificate/


9 posted on 07/26/2009 5:49:15 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: max americana

good post! I’m sick of being called a “crank”. and I’m not willing to give the obamanation a pass on not being eligible to serve in this country. he has already proven how much distain he has for America... this is a great imposter... So far, his body count to hide his lack of being legal is 3. And that’s just the ones we know about. The imposter has blood on his hands


10 posted on 07/26/2009 5:51:50 PM PDT by bareford101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc; 2ndDivisionVet; bareford101

I believe Obama states in his book that he was going through his grandmother’s belongings and he found his birth certificate.

Excerpt-
And just yesterday, Hawaii official changed their story when they told CNN researchers that all original birth certificates had been destroyed in 2001 when the state went paperless. So their claim that they verified’ the information in the COLB against the original in 2008 was a lie. They just made up the information. But if they do still have the original like they claimed last year, then they are now lying about its existence so they don’t have to release it and let the truth come out.”


11 posted on 07/26/2009 5:56:19 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we.......” good catch!


12 posted on 07/26/2009 5:57:37 PM PDT by bareford101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

No doctors, nurses or staff remember(have any record) helping deliver the resident of the USA


13 posted on 07/26/2009 6:01:49 PM PDT by italianquaker (We went from a country that hates the president to a president that hates his country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american
I swear, you have to read these people's statements like a Philadelphia lawyer to notice what they AREN'T saying.

I'm not at all familiar with what they do in Hawaii, but it can't be all that different from anywhere else when it comes to official documents.

No way could they legally destroy the paper records without making a complete record of their contents. The 'certificate of live birth' doesn't contain all the information that's in an original long form birth certificate (in fact it's a different document). Therefore, it couldn't act as a legal substitute.

Here's where I think they're lying. They DID destroy the paper documents -- but they microfilmed them first. That's what has been done in Georgia. Any birth certificates before WWII have been microfilmed and the paper records destroyed.

The Hawaii authorities are trying to cover for Obama by saying 'the paper records were destroyed' but just happening not to mention that they were all microfilmed first. Betcha money.

14 posted on 07/26/2009 6:06:25 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Okay. The bottom line is that, because Hawaii’s records were digitized and then destroyed, there is no paper birth certificate or certificate of live birth (same thing) documenting Mr. Obama’s birth.”

This posting has a serious credibility problem. The official birth certificate was sealed October 2008!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2116426/posts

How could it have been destroyed if it was important enough to be sealedby the state of Hawai?

Someone is trying to make someone look foolish for some reason!


15 posted on 07/26/2009 6:07:42 PM PDT by 4FreeSpeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4FreeSpeach

Msot government agencies I am familiar with (state of Cal for 28 years) stored their paper records after digitizing their systems. Why would they destroy the source documents?


16 posted on 07/26/2009 6:09:08 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: max americana; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bingo!


17 posted on 07/26/2009 6:15:31 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

” “Let’s move on”....?????

Hm?...Where did I hear this before? Oh! Yes! With Monica Lewinsky and her blue dress.”

Exactly.
The MSM ignored and ridiculed the Monica Lewinsky story.
Just like they did the John Edwards is having an affair.
And John Edwards has a love child.
And JFK had many mistresses.


18 posted on 07/26/2009 6:20:05 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m starting to think it’s about time for Hawaii to be kicked out of the country.


19 posted on 07/26/2009 6:22:10 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In November 2008, various state officials claimed that they personally examined the original to verify the COLB.

If these officials did this, they should be arrested, as what they did is against Hawaii's law.
20 posted on 07/26/2009 6:22:27 PM PDT by stylin19a (Obama's Plan B - Payday Loans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson