All happiness and hope... which is generally not justified by the actual workings of the legal process.
Posted on 07/20/2009 4:17:05 AM PDT by Man50D
The Judge assured Orly that the case would be given top priority and would be quote, “resolved quicker in this court than in any other court.”
LOL, hahahaahah
I just got off the phone with Attorney Charles Lincoln who has been working with Dr. Orly and was at the hearing today.
The judge denied default BUT he ordered that the case proceed without any objections, and that the case would be decided on its merits.
Obama has 60 days to answer. The Judge assured Orly that the case would be given top priority and would be quote, “resolved quicker in this court than in any other court.” Charles said he feels the best about this judge than any other Judge in his entire career as a lawyer. Sarah Brooks
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House. The DOJ will be involved with the case also….
I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama. Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs. [Whoooohoooo! The time is drawing nigh! It has been a long slog!
Perhaps the slog will be shortened, now that we have a Marine Judge in charge of our destiny! Semper Fidelis]
I hope you will show your support by Sharing this to as many people as you can, please.
Tanks!
Why don’t they just go to Snopes for their answers?
I mean, isn’t Snopes the final word on urban legends, myths and Consitutional issues?
(Do I really need “/s”?)
Seems to override FOI doesn’t it?
At this point...with “crunch time” looming on budget, debt, legislative priorities and sliding polls....they need to put this issue to bed. IMHO...the Feds will get a ruling they need.
“He’s not going to dismiss even if the plaintiffs screw-up procedurally? Guaranteed appeal and reversal with nothing revealed or accomplished.”
Not so, because you can’t appeal BEFORE a trial and all that is really needed to prove the case is to reach discovery, which is actually before the hearing. If Obama is compelled to produce his birth certificate it can speak for itself.
Just wondering: Did the judge have to present a birth certificate in order to join the Marines?
As we know, Obama will not give Hawaii permission to release his long form birth certificate from Aug.4,1961, the day Obama claims he was born in Kapiolani Hospital.
Pardon me for my legal ignorance, but if it is within doubt that Obama is qualified to be president, can his excecutive orders be upheld since they would also be suspect? ANYONE GOT AN ANSWER FOR THIS?
So, if it is deemed that 0bama is not eligible to be president, what happens then? If his presidency is illegitimate, that would make Biden’s vice presidency illegitimate as well. And the entire 2008 election. That said, would there be another election? And until that happened, would Bush be reinstated, or would the presidency go to .... gasp .... Speaker of the House Pelosi?
The first sentence reads: “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America . . . .”
If he is not constitutionally eligible to be preident then he has no authority under the constitution which like many other laws he has passed will become moot.
All happiness and hope... which is generally not justified by the actual workings of the legal process.
Why dong bloggers just post a link to Taitz's website instead of cutting and pasting?
The judge did not guarantee a trial. What he could have done last week, but did not, was dismiss the case on a technicality. The defense in this issue, Obama, was never served. This has to be done within 120 days of filing and was never done, Taitz's farce on inauguration day notwithstanding. Failure to do so is grounds for dismissal. What the judge did, and it's within his power to do so, was to allow Taitz an extenstion, and explain the process to her; apparently she was unaware that she should serve the local U.S. Attorney who acts on behalf of the president and the United States. Once that was done, the defense now has 60 days in which to respond. What the U.S. Attorney will no doubt do is ask that the case be dismissed because Keyes lacks the legal standing to sue. That has been the response to all the other cases and it's been the reason why they have all been dismissed without trial. Obviously it's up to the judge, but it would not surprise me at all if that's what happens yet again.
She did screw up. But it is within the judge's authority to allow her the extra time so it wouldn't be a guaranteed reversal should this matter ever come to trial in the first place.
It was last Monday I believe. The 20th.
Yeah, I couldn't even begin to count the times I heard people on radio assure the host that so-and-so was about to spill the beans, that generals were getting ready to remove Clinton from office, that news was about to break that would bring Clinton down.
60 days may be too late for the country. If this was something he should have proved before running or taking office, shouldn’t the documents be readily available?
Anyone can find a expert forger in 60 days!
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.