Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Succession
Campus Report ^ | July 10, 2009 | Emily Kanyi

Posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:16 AM PDT by bs9021

Presidential Succession

by: Emily Kanyi, July 10, 2009

After the 9/11 terrorist attack it became clear that the U.S. was not immune to acts of violence that could infiltrate the country’s heart of business and power causing massive destruction and loss of life. It also became clear that the country needed to put into place a system that would facilitate an easy succession to the presidency in the “face of a catastrophic attack that would kill or incapacitate multiple individuals in the line of succession,” according to a June 2009 report jointly released by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and Brookings Institution Continuity of Government Commission.

The report, titled “Presidential Succession” indicates that “the current [presidential] system would be inadequate” in the event of such an attack and further suggests that “the current system must be corrected to ensure continuity in the executive branch.”

Speaking at the report’s launch at AEI, John C. Fortier—the Commission’s committee Executive Director and a research fellow at AEI—said that “Washington will remain a key target for terrorists.” Fortier pointed out that “both the constitution and the law fail to outline an adequate succession plan.”

Frances Townsend, head of Corporate Risk Management Consulting at Baker Botts, expressed concern about “people’s [limited] attention and time to this issue,” and said that it was important to find out what the government was doing to address it. “We need to ask the current administration: ‘what are you doing about this?’” she said. Townsend urged that “there needs to be people inside the government who are devoted to this topic and constantly refining [it].”....

(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: bho44; nationalsecurity; president; wot

1 posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:16 AM PDT by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bs9021
“both the constitution and the law fail to outline an adequate succession plan.”

Is this guy for real, the constitution has a complete line for succession...

2 posted on 07/10/2009 11:19:47 AM PDT by sniper63 (Silent and stealthy - one shot - one kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

What he’s talking about if DC gets nuked with a respectable carry-in by terrorists...the same terrorists that Zer0 thinks are brothers. At the right time, they’re all gone.


3 posted on 07/10/2009 11:28:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

The intent of the 9/11 attack was to decapitate our economy, government and military in one act.

The author is asking what if such an attack succeeds...how do we respond if nobody knows who is commander-in-chief and may not know for several days due to radiation, etc.


4 posted on 07/10/2009 11:37:40 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
At the right time, they’re all gone.

And the villagers rejoice. . .
5 posted on 07/10/2009 11:40:00 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sniper63
Is this guy for real, the constitution has a complete line for succession...

The Constitution doesn't, federal law does. Specifically the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 which lays out the path of succession after vice-president.

6 posted on 07/10/2009 11:40:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
No thanks, in such a scenerio I'll listen to what Sarah has to say.

She's my leader now anyway, eh?

7 posted on 07/10/2009 11:44:11 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bs9021
Townsend urged that “there needs to be people inside the government who are devoted to this topic and constantly refining [it].”....

Another czar, huh? It could be a short report. Something like, "In case of trouble always appoint a democrat."

I bet there are republicans who would sign off on that.

8 posted on 07/10/2009 12:11:57 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

with biden and pelosi in line the secret service is unnecessary.


9 posted on 07/10/2009 12:37:27 PM PDT by G Larry (ObamaCare = "DYING IN LINE!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
The intent of the 9/11 attack was to decapitate our economy, government and military in one act.
/bingo
10 posted on 07/10/2009 12:40:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson