Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We All Have Civil Rights: The Supreme Court
The Stiletto Blog ^ | July 4, 2009 | The Stiletto

Posted on 07/04/2009 11:57:00 AM PDT by theothercheek

In its editorial marking the 233rd year since the founding of our nation, The Washington Post notes; “The men who produced the Constitution were preoccupied with the abuse of power. They talked in terms of restraint, division of powers, limits on government. They were ever mindful of the ways in which a majority could impose its will on a minority.”

But as Ricci v. DeStefano demonstrates, sometimes the abuse of power occurs when the government seeks to impose its will on a majority.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestilettoblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; firefighters; quotas; ricci

1 posted on 07/04/2009 11:57:00 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
I have "inalienable rights"! Civil rights are the creation of government, controlled by government, and may be taken away by government.

Civil rights are not guaranteed by our Constitution, inalienable rights are!

2 posted on 07/04/2009 12:12:45 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Yup.

And if for some reason you decide to file an “equal protection” lawsuit based on the 14th Amendment, guess what?
You just declared yourself to be a “United States” citizen and are under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress.


3 posted on 07/04/2009 12:17:46 PM PDT by djf (Go tell everybody its calm before the storm Can you hear the distant thunder baby....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

As GM/Chrysler bondholders well know. [/sarc][/cynic]


4 posted on 07/04/2009 1:08:28 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Wanna bet there will be another Supreme Court challenge, this time about superceding (nullifying, really) bankruptcy law?


5 posted on 07/04/2009 4:19:28 PM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Considering the USSC responses to both the GM/Chrysler bondholders, and the BC/Eligibility Issue (They could force the matter and shut everyone up!) I’m going to bet that there won’t be one.

At what point, might I ask, does the USSC, the Congress, or the Executive become a domestic enemy of the Constitution that service members are sworn to defend against? Is it when congress passes laws, in the face of overwhelming public opposition, which have portions which are to be filled in later? Is it when the Executive forces businesses to dissolve & reform bypassing and not honoring its obligations? Is it when the high-court DOES NOT EVEN HEAR the complaints of wronged people? Or ensure the legality and eligibility of the President?

When is enough enough?


6 posted on 07/04/2009 4:32:52 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson