Posted on 07/01/2009 8:49:16 AM PDT by Islaminaction
Although President Obama had recently stated that "We're out of money now" he still continues with his nonstop catering to the Islamic world. It is obvious where his loyalties are.
(Excerpt) Read more at islaminaction08.blogspot.com ...
Money for Appeasement and Obama Love Ping!
An islamist in the White House? I'm shocked! SHOCKED, I say!
IMPEACHMENT!
HE’S A TRAITOR TO THE US!!
OUT WITH THE DICTATOR !!!
Redistribution of Christian wealth!
TAKING CARE OF HIS OWN PEOPLE FIRST!
LLS
Give them money so they can buy more weapons and explosives to kill us with....Brilliant strategy Obama!!
Maybe they can use it to buy more rope
C-SPAN host Steve Scully broke from a meek Washington press corps with probing questions for the new president.
SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?
OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not caused by any decisions we've made on health care so far. This is a consequence of the crisis that we've seen and in fact our failure to make some good decisions on health care over the last several decades ...
To All
Add it up , he is giving the islamics more, us at home less (excepting more debt and taxes), destroying the economy, disarming the military, disenfranchising our traditional g7 allies, supporting Marxists, destroying the church and promoting Islam...... Israel? Forget it! You and your people Have gone the way of the dodo bird! (Let alone his (these were not democratically driven) own czars giving the Govt more control over commerce, health and military)
Basically, he is dismantling the US and in doing so taking down the free western world.
Simple, plain and easy to see.
This treasonous conspiracy should be impeachable as destroying the US of A is not in the constitution.
The list, ping
“SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?
OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not caused by any decisions we’ve made on health care so far. This is a consequence of the crisis that we’ve seen and in fact our failure to make some good decisions on health care over the last several decades ...”
Non-Sequiturs are so easy. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is not. The statement falls under both. The question is whether the person in the debate/interview even knows what they are and how to respond. Typically, you call the other person on it by simply saying, “That’s a non-sequitur. The question/point I was making is...” It may take 3 times of doing this, but, typically, the other party ends the practice after the third instance.
Works on all logical fallacies by the way, e.g., ad hominem, ad populum (bandwagon), post hoc ergo propter hoc (after the fact, thus because of farther back).
People aren’t taught anything about these things anymore. Here’s some links to help FReepers teach their children—or co-workers:
UNC handout:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html
General fallacies site:
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/
Mission Critical (has quizzes, too) (Cool place, too)
http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/itl/graphics/main.html
I guess the left is happy.
Wasn’t part of Bin Laden’s plan to break us financially?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.