Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critical Mass: Czars And Obama's Shadow Government
The Cypress Times ^ | 06/12/2009 | Bill Turner

Posted on 06/12/2009 6:46:52 AM PDT by Patriot1259

We have reached critical mass, as citizens of the United States of America. The attacks are coming fast and furious from those in power. The Constitution is being shredded right before our eyes. Before we go any further, ask yourself one question: With all of the attorneys in the House and Senate, why is no one standing up and challenging the legality of the Presidents actions? As I pondered that one, my ears began to bleed and I could feel the onset of an aneurism. I never wrapped my mind around it completely, but I have no doubt that money and power have much to do with it. Let us examine just one aspect of B. Hussein Obama’s Constitutional violations, the establishment of a shadow government.

A shadow government has been described as a “’government-in-waiting’ that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event.” I submit that the creation and wide spread use of Czars is the formation of a shadow government, designed to usurp the Constitution, the Congress and the citizens of the United States of America.

What is a czar?

(Excerpt) Read more at thecypresstimes.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: constitution; czar; obama
An editorial in The Cypress Times today poses a very frightening scenario which states that Obama is appointing Czars in order to create a Shadow Government, to overthrow our current Constitutional government. Compelling points.
1 posted on 06/12/2009 6:46:52 AM PDT by Patriot1259
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259
With all of the attorneys in the House and Senate, why is no one standing up and challenging the legality of the Presidents actions?

Because their treason is worse than his.

2 posted on 06/12/2009 6:48:20 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Pas d'ennmis a droit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

Same as my theory. It gives me nightmares.


3 posted on 06/12/2009 6:50:03 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Current Misery Index Approximately 36%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259
"Obama is appointing Czars in order to create a Shadow Government, to overthrow our current Constitutional government."

I just got off the phone with (R, GA)Senator Saxby Chamblis' office, asking that very question. They said there is nothing they can do, that obama made sure what he was doing was legal. I begged to differ, saying that nationalizing private industry is unconstitutional. The phone guy replied: "That's not how he put it."

IOW, if the president dosen't call it nationalizing, it ain't. Kind of like Nixon saying 'If the president does it, it's not illegal.' After that call I feel completely screwed.

4 posted on 06/12/2009 6:55:13 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

In the future, please place content from this site into our bloggers forum.

Thanks,


5 posted on 06/12/2009 6:55:29 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

"Czars. . ? , . . We don't need no stinking Czars!"

6 posted on 06/12/2009 6:56:39 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

Does anyone know who is PAYING these czars, and how much? I know it’s We The Taxpayers ultimately, but which bucket of goverment money are they dipping out of?


7 posted on 06/12/2009 6:57:00 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

21 czars and each of them gave a substantial contribution to Obama’s campaign, including car czar Rattner at over $60,000.


8 posted on 06/12/2009 6:58:26 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
First they are mullahs not Czars.

Second: We are at a crossroads IMO. We and the USSC have allowed an unelected mullah (car czar) to usurp over a hundred years of contract law and steal the assets of “Secured Creditors” and give those assets to socialist political allies. Can anyone find in the US Constitution where the feds were given that power let alone that power given to a mullah?

Third: Again we are at a crossroad when we allow another unelected mullah to create an ex post facto law by dictating pay scales AFTER THE FACT to those companies that were, in some cases, forced into taking TARP funds.

There seems to be NOTHING we can do. Constitutional protections no longer exist. We have true taxation WITHOUT representation in these mullahs yet we do not act.

We can, in 2 years throw out EVERYONE who is up for reelection but in all honesty, given the blitzkrieg in the first 6 months I believe the damage done will be completely beyond repair. Yet we do nothing.

I write/call about once per week to my elected officials but have seen in the last 18 months a complete disconnect between my original message and the response. Their responses would seem to be nothing more that recycled campaign rhetoric. Yet we do nothing.

Ok, short of doing what Thomas Jefferson told us we might have to do, what can be done to stop this socialist/marxist blitzkrieg?

9 posted on 06/12/2009 7:10:11 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

This is absolutely treasonous! I am copying this article to send around via my private email.

Thanks for finding this!


10 posted on 06/12/2009 7:10:21 AM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259
At a certain point in time, the semantics circumventing the constitution, will fail and obama will be removed......I see it coming.
11 posted on 06/12/2009 7:13:02 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Very well stated!

Exceptional!


12 posted on 06/12/2009 7:14:14 AM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

Using the term “czar” slanders the historical czars of Russia. I suggest a more accurate term for Obama’s czars would be “commissar”. Commissar more accurately reflects the Obama administration’s Bolshevik leanings.


13 posted on 06/12/2009 7:29:54 AM PDT by TheConservativeBanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeBanker

“Using the term “czar” slanders the historical czars of Russia”

Yes, I agree with you on this. I have a special place in my heart for some of the Tsars of Russia, even though I am an American. The atmosphere of the time makes for good book writing.

Not one person this imbecilic POTUS has appointed is fit to wipe the boots of some of Russia’s Tsars!


14 posted on 06/12/2009 7:34:49 AM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

The electoral system is rigged. We cannot exercise our sovereign powers anymore by voting.

Hope for change.


15 posted on 06/12/2009 8:09:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Pas d'ennmis a droit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I believe that the current campaign financing laws do rig the elections to keep the ruling class in power.

When a group or corporation is allowed to contribute huge amounts of cash then the individual citizen's voice is lost.

It is supposed to be “We the People” not we the unions or we the corporations or we the media.

The one and only thing we could do is for the next few elections cycles NEVER reelect anyone. We cannot allow them to build their power base.

I would like to see the right and left in this country get together to limit campaign contributions to ONLY individual US Citizens with a strict limit of maybe $2,000. If an individual gives any money to any party or person right now it is dwarfed by special interest groups many of which are not even in the USA.

16 posted on 06/12/2009 9:53:30 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

"The psychopolitician has his reward in the nearly unlimited control of populaces, in the uninhibited exercise of passion, and the glory of communist conquest over the stupidity of the enemies of the People."

How to be a President

17 posted on 06/12/2009 10:53:24 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1259

1. Afghanistan-Pakistan (Af-Pak) czar, Richard Holbrooke
2. AIDS czar, Jeffrey Crowley [openly gay white man]
3. Auto recovery czar, Ed Montgomery
4. Behavioral science czar, position not yet filled
5. Bailout czar, Herbert Allison Jr., [replaced Bush bailout czar Neel Kashkari, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Financial Stability confirmed by Senate]
6. Border czar, Alan Bersin
7. Car czar, Ron Bloom [Counselor to the Secretary of the Treasury , under Senate oversight]
8. Climate change czar, Todd Stern
9. Copyright czar, not appointed yet
10. Counterterrorism czar, John Brennan
11. Cybersecurity czar, position will be vacant on August 21st [upon the departure of Melissa Hathaway]
12. Disinformation czar, Linda Douglass [This is a new media buzz since our earlier list, a response by pundits to the White House request for informants: see Glenn Beck and Lew Rockwell]
13. Domestic violence czar, Lynn Rosenthal
14. Drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske
15. Economic czar, Larry Summers
16. Economic czar number two, Paul Volcker
17. Education czar, Arne Duncan
18. Energy czar, Carol Browner
19. Food czar, Michael Taylor [a former Monsanto executive, or, the fox in charge of the henhouse]
20. Government performance czar, Jeffrey Zients
21. Great Lakes czar, Cameron Davis
22. Green jobs czar, Van Jones [who has a communist background]
23. Guantanamo closure czar, Daniel Fried
24. Health czar, Nancy-Ann DeParle
25. Infotech czar, Vivek Kundra [Shoplifted four shirts, worth $33.50 each, from J.C. Penney in 1996 (source). His last day in DC government was March 4 but on March 12 the FBI raided his office and arrested two staffers.]
26. Intelligence czar, Dennis Blair [Director of National Intelligence, a Senate confirmed position. He is a retired United States Navy four-star admiral]
27. Latin-American czar, Arturo Valenzuela (nominee) [although this post is referred to as a czar, he is nominatied to be Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs and so is subject to Senate confirmation. Voting on his confirmation was delayed to clarify his position on Honduras. Watch WaPo’s Head Count to track status of confirmation.]
28. Mideast peace czar, George Mitchell
29. Mideast policy czar, Dennis Ross
30. Pay czar, Kenneth Feinberg
31. Regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein
32. Religion czar, aka God czar Joshua DuBois
33. Safe schools czar, Kevin Jennings [appointed to be Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, a newly created post (that does not require Senate confirmation); openly gay founder of an organization dedicated to promoting pro-homosexual clubs and curricula in public schools]
34. Science czar, John Holdren
35. Stimulus oversight czar, Earl Devaney
36. Sudan czar, J. Scott Gration
37. TARP czar, Elizabeth Warren [chair of the [Congressional Oversight Panel for the Trouble Assets Relief Program; note that Herb Allison is frequently called the TARP czar]
38. Technology czar, Aneesh Chopra
39. Trade czar, Ron Kirk
40. Urban affairs czar, Adolfo Carrion
41. War czar, Douglas Lute [retained from Bush administration, married to Jane Holl Lute, currently a Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security]
42. Water czar, David J. Hayes [a Deputy Interior Secretary and therefore subject to Senate oversight]
43. Weapons czar, Ashton Carter [actually Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and so subject to Senate confirmation]
44. Weapons of mass destruction czar, Gary Samore

Positions being planned:

1. Income redistribution czar
2. Land-use czar
3. Mortgage czar, formally “consumer financial protection czar” (source)
4. Radio-internet fairness czar
5. Student loan czar, to oversee a program of mandatory service in return for college money (source)
6. Voter list czar
7. Zoning czar

Obama has moved swiftly to concentrate power in the White House, bypassing the review of our elected representatives in Congress in most of the posts listed above. Even though cabinet positions are part of the executive branch, the cabinet secretaries must be approved by Congress, they are funded by Congress, and they can be called before Congress to testify. Most of these czars, on the other hand, are appointed by Obama at his sole discretion, and are answerable only to him. If subpoenaed by Congress, they can claim executive privilege.

http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?p=2385


18 posted on 08/15/2009 1:09:19 AM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson