Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/06/2009 6:02:44 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: John Semmens

Will this get to the Supreme Court for a final ruling? I sure hope so...


2 posted on 06/06/2009 6:04:30 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

I dont see how they can do this.

States have a right to conduct elections how they see fit.


3 posted on 06/06/2009 6:07:15 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Paragraph #4 is an all time winner!


4 posted on 06/06/2009 6:08:44 PM PDT by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“We don’t require this level of documentation to be elected president,”

Unfortunately, we are SUPPOSED to require a birth certificate for the president. Obviously, this Constitutional requirement of actually being ELIGIBLE is not the official policy of the One.


6 posted on 06/06/2009 6:10:59 PM PDT by datura ("Against all enemies, both foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

What is humiliating about proving eligibility? It seems to me they are more worried about hurting the feeling of the voter who shouldn’t be voting in the first place. When are we going to say enough is enough!!!!


7 posted on 06/06/2009 6:14:05 PM PDT by lula ( If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
This is the sort of lawyer you get with the Obama Regime ~ a Loretta King who is so ignorant she is apparantly unaware the Supreme Court says requiring picture identification of voters is reasonable.

He could have hired some quality talent but it seemed to me he was more interested in getting people in there who would make it OK to sell pornography to 6 year olds ~ the others, like this King woman just sort of oozed in.

Let's face it, Obama is far more interested in party time and making sure his penis has "access" than affairs of state.

8 posted on 06/06/2009 6:14:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

How do you sleep at night knowing all the indigestion you cause? :)


9 posted on 06/06/2009 6:19:02 PM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

So tell me...how will they ensure that the person voting is the actual registered voter? How will they prevent someone from voting multiple times in different locations? How can you get a voter identification card and even register to vote without some way to prove your identity?...etc.?

The South has always been castigated in the past because it was claimed voter fraud was rampant and the minority was “disenfranchised”. What, they want to do the same thing now? Is this the Chicago way, too?

This ridiculous ruling makes the FEDS look incredibly stoooopid!


11 posted on 06/06/2009 6:22:50 PM PDT by boatbums
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

The Democrats don’t want anyone to show proof of eligibility. They want as many felons and illegal aliens to vote as possible.


12 posted on 06/06/2009 6:23:03 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
GANGSTER AMERICA 2009

=========================

In Obama's America, Americans can be forced at gunpoint to vote for
whom the Masters choose. Obama's Gangster-DOJ encouraged such gangster tactics.

In Obama's America, Americans can be forced to lose their assets at gunpoint
or using the IRS. Obama's Gangster-DOJ encouraged such gangster tactics.


13 posted on 06/06/2009 6:25:43 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

SATIRE!


14 posted on 06/06/2009 6:25:47 PM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Heh. Made me look.


16 posted on 06/06/2009 6:52:14 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

John,

I know that you work hard at this, but I think that every one of these types of posts should have the word SATIRE in parenthesis at the start of the title.

God bless.

Sursum Corda


17 posted on 06/06/2009 6:54:37 PM PDT by Sursum Corda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
Miz King...as in the words of the great philosopher, Forrest Gump, “Stupid is as stupid does.”
20 posted on 06/06/2009 7:17:55 PM PDT by boatbums
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
requiring prospective voters to submit to such scrutiny at the polls would be humiliating...

obviously she's never stepped foot in a Mass. Registry of Motor Vehicles.

21 posted on 06/06/2009 7:22:09 PM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Just getting things set up for the 2010 election.


22 posted on 06/06/2009 7:23:29 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
King went on to cite the “disproportionate impact on those without easy access to these forms of documentation. Those who cannot read may not be able to obtain driver’s licenses because they can’t pass the written exam. Those who cannot show a valid birth certificate can’t obtain a valid Social Security number.”

I'm sure the Georgia law made it possible for people to get ID's not tied to Driver's licenses. Since one must be a legal CITIZEN to vote, anyone born here in the US would have access to a birth certificate, or some record of birth.

As for the comment about having to show ID being humiliating and reducing voter turnout, it is patently ridiculous. We're required to show ID for any number of activities in which we're involved, from bank transactions to airline travel. I don't see that people are staying away from either of those activities because of having to show an ID is intimidating.

23 posted on 06/06/2009 7:29:08 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

You got me this time! Prolly because I am in Ga. and I am tired of hearing how burdensome it is to produce an ID to vote.

But try buying a drink in Dawson County at my age (55) without an ID. It ain’t gonna happen. Wonder if they still do that in North Fulton?


26 posted on 06/06/2009 8:10:25 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
contravening the Administration’s policy of ensuring that all have access to the right to vote

This is exactly right, actually. The Zero Administration wants everyone to vote. Especially those that don't have the right to sufferage.

30 posted on 06/06/2009 8:22:35 PM PDT by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“King went on to cite the “disproportionate impact on those without easy access to these forms of documentation.”

Don’t you have to have ID to get welfare?


32 posted on 06/06/2009 8:26:48 PM PDT by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson