Posted on 06/03/2009 6:43:17 AM PDT by ClimateDepot.com
Wednesday, June 03, 2009By Marc Morano Climate Depot [ Update: 8:44 AM ET: Talking Points Memo (TPM) has removed the article from their website. "The file you are looking for has not been found" - But the url with a portion of the chilling message lingers as evidence: "at-what-point-do-we-jail-or-ex..." - http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/crazedandconfused/2009/06/at-what-point-do-we-jail-or-ex.php?ref=reccafe - Climate Depot has also saved a screen shot of the orginal article.]
A public appeal has been issued by an influential U.S. website asking: At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers. The appeal appeared on Talking Points Memo, an often cited website that helps set the agenda for the political Left in the U.S. The anonymous posting, dated June 2, 2009, referred to dissenters of man-made global warming fears as greedy bastards who use bogus science or the lowest scientists in the gene pool to distort data.
The Talking Points Memo article continues: So when the right wing f*cktards have caused it to be too late to fix the problem, and we start seeing the devastating consequences and we start seeing end of the World type events - how will we punish those responsible. It will be too late. So shouldn't we start punishing them now?" The article also claims the vast majority of scientists agree that man-made warming can do an untold amount of damage to life on Earth.
The full text of the Talking Points Memo is reproduced below:
(Note: The entry is posted under the anonymous byline "The Insolent Braggart")
At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers June 2, 2009, 9:42PM
What is so frustrating about these fools is that they are the politicians and greedy bastards who don't want a cut in their profits who use bogus science or the lowest scientists in the gene pool who will distort data for a few bucks. The vast majority of the scientific minds in the World agree and understand it's a very serious problem that can do an untold amount of damage to life on Earth.
So when the right wing f*cktards have caused it to be too late to fix the problem, and we start seeing the devastating consequences and we start seeing end of the World type events - how will we punish those responsible. It will be too late. So shouldn't we start punishing them now?
#
Climate Depot Editor's Note:
The Talking Points Memo appeal to execute skeptics is not unique. As the science behind man-made global warming fears utterly collapses, many of the biggest promoters of the theory and environmental activists are growing increasingly desperate.
NASA's James Hansen has called for trials of climate skeptics in 2008 for "high crimes against humanity. Environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at skeptics of 2007 declaring This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors In 2009, RFK, Jr. also called coal companies "criminal enterprises" and declared CEO's 'should be in jail... for all of eternity."
In 2006, the eco-magazine Grist called for Nuremberg-Style trials for skeptics. In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown into jail. In 2007, The Weather Channel's climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.
A 2008 report found that 'climate blasphemy' is replacing traditional religious blasphemy. In addition, a July 2007 Senate report detailed how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation
In 2007, then EPA Chief Vowed to Probe E-mail Threatening to 'Destroy' Career of Climate Skeptic and dissenters of warming fears have been called 'Climate Criminals' who are committing 'Terracide' (killing of Planet Earth) (July 25, 2007) In addition, in May 2009, Climate Depot Was Banned in Louisiana! See: State official sought to 'shut down' climate skeptic's testimony at hearing
Below are many more examples of the threats, name calling and intimidation skeptics have faced in recent times.
November 12, 2007: UN official warns ignoring warming would be 'criminally irresponsible' Excerpt: The U.N.'s top climate official warned policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be "criminally irresponsible." Yvo de Boer's comments came at the opening of a weeklong conference that will complete a concise guide on the state of global warming and what can be done to stop the Earth from overheating.
September 29. 2007: VA State Climatologist skeptical of global warming loses job after clash with Governor: 'I was told that I could not speak in public' Excerpt: Michaels has argued that the climate is becoming warmer but that the consequences will not be as dire as others have predicted. Gov. Kaine had warned. Michaels not to use his official title in discussing his views. "I resigned as Virginia state climatologist because I was told that I could not speak in public on my area of expertise, global warming, as state climatologist," Michaels said in a statement this week provided by the libertarian Cato Institute, where he has been a fellow since 1992. "It was impossible to maintain academic freedom with this speech restriction." (LINK)
Skeptical State Climatologist in Oregon has title threatened by Governor (February 8, 2007) Excerpt: [State Climatologist George Taylor] does not believe human activities are the main cause of global climate change...So the [Oregon] governor wants to take that title from Taylor and make it a position that he would appoint. In an exclusive interview with KGW-TV, Governor Ted Kulongoski confirmed he wants to take that title from Taylor.
Skeptical State Climatologist in Delaware silenced by Governor (May 2, 2007) Excerpt: Legates is a state climatologist in Delaware, and he teaches at the university. He`s not part of the mythical climate consensus. In fact, Legates believes that we oversimplify climate by just blaming greenhouse gases. One day he received a letter from the governor, saying his views do not concur with those of the administration, so if he wants to speak out, it must be as an individual, not as a state climatologist. So essentially, you can have the title of state climatologist unless he`s talking about his views on climate?
October 28, 2008: License to dissent: 'Internet should be nationalized as a public utility' to combat global warming skepticism - Australian Herald Sun - Excerpt: British journalism lecturer and warming alarmist Alex Lockwood says my blog is a menace to the planet. Skeptical bloggers like me need bringing into line, and Lockwood tells a journalism seminar of some options: There is clearly a need for research into the ways in which climate skepticism online is free to contest scientific fact. But there is enough here already to put forward some of the ideas in circulation. One of the founders of the Internet Vint Cerf, and lead for Google's Internet for Everyone project, made a recent suggestion that the Internet should be nationalized as a public utility. As tech policy blogger Jim Harper argues, giving power over the Internet to well-heeled interests and self-interested politicians is, and I quote, a bad idea. Or in the UK every new online publication could be required to register with the recently announced Internet watchdog...
November 5, 2008: UK Scientist: 'BBC SHUNNED ME FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE' UK Daily Express Excerpt: FOR YEARS David Bellamy was one of the best known faces on TV. A respected botanist and the author of 35 books, he had presented around 400 programmes over the years and was appreciated by audiences for his boundless enthusiasm. Yet for more than 10 years he has been out of the limelight, shunned by bosses at the BBC where he made his name, as well as fellow scientists and environmentalists. His crime? Bellamy says he doesn't believe in man-made global warming. Here he reveals why and the price he has paid for not toeing the orthodox line on climate change.
U.N. official says it's 'completely immoral' to doubt global warming fears (May 10, 2007) Excerpt: UN special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland declared it's completely immoral, even, to question the UN's scientific consensus."
Former US Vice President Al Gore compared global warming skeptics to people who 'believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona' (June 20, 2006)
Gore Refuses to Hear Skeptical Global Warming Views (Video)
UK environment secretary David Miliband said 'those who deny [climate change] are the flat-Earthers of the twenty-first century' (October 6, 2006)
Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics (January 17, 2007) Excerpt: The Weather Channel's most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.
Related Links:
Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing - April 23, 2009
S. African UN Scientist: 'The whole climate change issue is about to fall apart -- Heads will roll!' - April 2009
Climate Depot Editorial: We would all be doomed if we actually faced climate 'crisis' - Cap-and-trade equals all economic pain for no climate gain
Warming theory 'dying the death of a thousand cuts' - Ocean Conveyor Belt Model Broken: 'Models are significantly wrong' - May 2009
Climate Fears RIP...for 30 years!? - Global Warming could stop 'for up to 30 years! Warming 'On Hold?...'Could go into hiding for decades' study finds Discovery.com March 2, 2009
Japanese Scientist compares global warming to 'astrology'
U.S. Senate Report: 700 Plus Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Warming Claims
That is an awesome quote and worthy of repetition.
Apparently The Grand Inquisitor has a computer now...............
HUUUUMMMMMMMMM!!Somebody needs a lobotomy!!!!
Megalomaniacs and totalitarians, whether sane or otherwise, always take the path of least resistance.
They self-appoint to save the world.
Hard to say whether they are numerous enough to take seriously but, without question, the world would be a better place without them.
There is just so much spare human energy to resist ever nutcase.
Can you imagine the ego and delusional frame of mind it must take to become an "advocate" against catastrophic natural processes?
I can't.
Given their position and how they propose handling their mission?
Sounds like an army planning what'll be done with POWs after an occupation.
The idjuts will want to send us all to Siberia because it’s cold, and it won’t even dawn on them what that means...
So...do we get to do the same when their cult destroys what is left of the American dream....if so it’s LONG overdue. I say we start with tires and gas.
“””I’m picturing a wild eyed, scraggly haired, Earth First type; sitting at his computer at 2:00 am, with half a dozen crumpled empty Red Bull cans on the floor.””””
I am picturing a chronically unemployed 20yo with a EMO haircut and black fingernails (gay, of course) that cries anti-corporate, anti-establishment crap all day but has $200 worth of white makeup, hair coloring, rings, piercings and other junk.
They are gonna save the world one soy bar at a time, you know.
But this article, for some reason, made me want to have a BBQ. I think I will get in my F250 SuperDuty and drive to the store for a bag of charcoal. Anyone up for medium rare steaks???
Yep, and he hasn't changed his underwear or showered for at least a week. Don't want to use up any of those precious water resources on anything so trivial as showering or doing laundry.
In the future, please post content from your blog into our bloggers forum.
Thanks,
We start with strongly encouraging our state legislatures to tell the feds to go pound sand.
Then we back them up when the feds come to enforce their unconstitutional dictates.
Yes, that would fit right in.
By the way, someone needs to to put this image into a picture somehow.
Of course there would also be a crumpled Obama “Hope” sign thrown in the overflowing trash can
Californa just passed a bill yesterday that called for ‘jail time for polluters’. I don’t know the details but I’m going to research when I have time.
Ah, one more example of the irrefutable tolerance of liberals. It’s so refreshing to experience tolerance, peace and love on such a grand scale.
< /S >
Yes. And when the libs start stamping out "hate speech" on the internet, they will bypass this stuff.
The tipping point has been reached folks. Anything less than a million people at the mall on 9/12 will be a useless failure.
I got my reservations yesterday at a place walking distance from the metro in MD. Airline tickets today. My sis-in-law has a lawyer brother in MD. I'm taking his phone number with me for insurance.
Completely unsurprising.
Solzhenitsyn said something about Communists always wanting a “dialogue” with their opponents, but once they’re in power the “dialogue” is conducted with carbines and truncheons.
These are the people who like to brag about their “tolerance.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.