Posted on 05/12/2009 4:04:23 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright
Revolutionary Communist Party USA Members of Revolutionary Communist Party US INCLUDE sitting CONGRESSMEN and SENATORS.
World Can't Wait is an offshoot of this organization.
No, no. Then they will report no one lives there.
Tell them 20 people live there. Give them names of pets.
(If you live in a red state. If you live in a blue state, you live alone.)
They want that. That’s a huge “red flag.”
Just give them fake info. Tell them your wife is black and you have 9 kids.
“Those in red states should vastly over-report who lives there.
“
You got that right. There will be many more than expected at this household
**********
So those of us stuck in blue states should do the opposite? Say we have fewer people than we do?
Are they asking:
Your religion
Political affiliation
If you own a gun
If you’re pro-life
If you support the Constitution and founding fathers
If you believe in God
What other information would Zero want about each of us before they send us to re-education camps?
As a current census worker, I only have to ask two questions 90% of the time. I usually have their address already on my computer and ask to verify that it is correct and then ask if it is a single family residence. Usually takes about 15 seconds and I quickly leave.
Lie. You were born a poor black woman.
Shit, my family escaped from France, hunted down. Grandpa lied, cheated, and even killed some French cops as the gig was up.
Just do what you have to do.
So, tell conservatives how to game the system.
Well, if he has that info and the GPS of your front door, he can just send a Predator.
Well, since we are all SLAVES to the Federal Government, I’ll just tell them that that my wife and I each count as 3/5 of a person. So 1.2 people live at my house.
“So those of us stuck in blue states should do the opposite? Say we have fewer people than we do?
“
Well, yes, if you’d like to help out even though you might get less representation. Of course, Blue State reps are usually commies so that should be a good thing.
“So those of us stuck in blue states should do the opposite? Say we have fewer people than we do?”
Correct. One person lives there.
No you do not have to give access to your property. They are not officers of the law, have no police powers, no search or warrant powers.
You don’t have to answer all the questions. Just how many people live there. You can also answer the other questions “My answer is I am not required under the Constitution to give you that information.” That way you have provided an answer, albeit one they don’t want to hear. Too forkin’ bad.
You can, after aswering how many people live there, say you will not answer any other questions, and to leave the premises immediately, and that you will be calling the police to report a trespasser who refuses to leave if they do not leave immediately.
They have no way to retaliate legally.
13-411. Justification; use of force in crime prevention; applicability
A. A person is justified in threatening or using both physical force and deadly physical force against another if and to the extent the person reasonably believes that physical force or deadly physical force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's commission of arson of an occupied structure under section 13-1704, burglary in the second or first degree under section 13-1507 or 13-1508, kidnapping under section 13-1304, manslaughter under section 13-1103, second or first degree murder under section 13-1104 or 13-1105, sexual conduct with a minor under section 13-1405, sexual assault under section 13-1406, child molestation under section 13-1410, armed robbery under section 13-1904 or aggravated assault under section 13-1204, subsection A, paragraphs 1 and 2.
B. There is no duty to retreat before threatening or using physical force or deadly physical force justified by subsection A of this section.
C. A person is presumed to be acting reasonably for the purposes of this section if the person is acting to prevent the commission of any of the offenses listed in subsection A of this section.
D. This section is not limited to the use or threatened use of physical or deadly physical force in a person's home, residence, place of business, land the person owns or leases, conveyance of any kind, or any other place in this state where a person has a right to be.
Arizona law also allows a homeowner/renter to defend their property against Criminal Trespass:
13-407. Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises
A. A person or his agent in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force or in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the extent that a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.
B. A person may use deadly physical force under subsection A only in the defense of himself or third persons as described in sections 13-405 and 13-406.
C. In this section, "premises" means any real property and any structure, movable or immovable, permanent or temporary, adapted for both human residence and lodging whether occupied or not.
In Arizona law, Criminal Trespass is defined as:
13-1504. Criminal trespass in the first degree; classification
A. A person commits criminal trespass in the first degree by knowingly:
1. Entering or remaining unlawfully in or on a residential structure.
2. Entering or remaining unlawfully in a fenced residential yard.
3. Entering any residential yard and, without lawful authority, looking into the residential structure thereon in reckless disregard of infringing on the inhabitant's right of privacy.
4. Entering unlawfully on real property that is subject to a valid mineral claim or lease with the intent to hold, work, take or explore for minerals on the claim or lease.
5. Entering or remaining unlawfully on the property of another and burning, defacing, mutilating or otherwise desecrating a religious symbol or other religious property of another without the express permission of the owner of the property.
6. Entering or remaining unlawfully in or on a critical public service facility.
B. Criminal trespass in the first degree under subsection A, paragraph 1, 5 or 6 is a class 6 felony. Criminal trespass in the first degree under subsection A, paragraph 2, 3 or 4 is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Further, Arizona law REQUIRES any federal agent to be certified by the County Sheriff, before he/she can exercise police power in the county:
13-3875. Cross-certification of federal peace officers; policy; powers; qualifications; liability; records
A. The sheriff of each county shall develop and adopt a policy on cross-certification of federal peace officers, including whether cross-certification shall be permitted in that county.
B. A federal peace officer who is employed by an agency of the United States and who has completed the basic training curriculum for the officer's agency shall possess and exercise all law enforcement powers of peace officers in this state for one year, including, if directed by the officer's employer, the capability to enforce the criminal laws of this state if the federal peace officer:
1. Submits to the sheriff a written request for certification as a peace officer in this state.
2. Submits evidence that the officer has been certified as a federal peace officer, is authorized by federal law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of a violation of federal law and is authorized by federal law to make arrests, serve warrants and carry firearms.
C. Each federal peace officer who requests cross-certification may submit to the sheriff a written request for certification as a peace officer in this state pursuant to subsection B. The cross-certification remains in effect for one year from the date on which the certification was authorized by the sheriff.
D. Neither the state nor any political subdivision is liable for any acts or failure to act by a federal peace officer.
E. The Arizona peace officer standards and training board shall maintain records of all federal peace officers who are certified as peace officers in this state.
Just FYI for all Arizona residents. :)
All the above can be found here:
Arizona Revised Statutes
All that ammo hoarding ain’t just for show!
Today, the controlling law for the U.S. Census is Title 13 of the U.S. Code. There is a lot of census data collected in the United States today, such as economic figures, sales and production figures, and agricultural statistics. Still, the head count is the only part of the census that is called for by the Constitution. The code for the enumeration can be found in 13 USC 141. In this code, the census is directed to be taken in 1980 and every ten years thereafter, and that the count is to be taken on April 1. The returns must be completed within nine months for use in apportionment of representatives. The code also specifies a mid-decade census be taken in 1985 and every ten years thereafter. This count need not be a head count (sampling may be used) though the data cannot be used for apportionment.
The code, at §141(g), notes that "As used in this section, 'census of population' means a census of population, housing, and matters relating to population and housing."
There are fines for non-response and for false response as well, though the amount has risen from the 1790's $20. Today failure to respond can result in a $100 fine; providing false answers is a more severe offense, and carries a $500 fine. Recent news reports, however, indicate that punishment for failure to respond is not usually enforced. The controlling section of the Code is 13 USC 221.
Today, all persons are counted as whole persons - the original census counted "other persons" (slaves) as three-fifths persons for the purposes of apportionment. This fractionalization was removed by the 14th Amendment. The Attorney General ruled, in 1940, that there were no longer any Indians in the United States who could be classified as "not taxed." In the Constitution, non-taxed Indians are not counted.
In 2000, a group of citizens are suing the Census over the questions on the long form - a form sent to one out of every six households. Though the 2000 log form is 18 questions shorter than the long form in 1990, and the shortest since the 1940 census, distrust of the Census Bureau's ability to keep the data private have many people up in arms about the questions. The suit challenges the ability of the census to ask all of the questions asked. The biggest problem for the suit is the Constitution itself: "[The Census] shall be made ... in such Manner as [Congress] shall by Law direct."
The questions on the long form are there because of legislation duly enacted into law by the Congress and signed by the President. Though the ire of citizens is being directed at the Bureau, the Bureau itself says that the Congress is to blame. The Census Bureau is looking to find ways to collect the data on the long form in other manners, such as polling and sampling. Though there is a possible $100 fine for failing to file with the Census, the Bureau also notes that no one has been penalized for failing to file in the past. The fine is more of a psychological reminder of the importance of the census than a source of income for the government.
Advice to leave the form blank or to fail to fill it in may actually bring more of the government into your life than you want - unfiled and incomplete forms will be followed-up upon by actual census workers, either in person or by telephone.
The U.S. Census Bureau has a web site at Census.gov and also has lots of data about the 2000 Census.
The 2000 census data, along with data from other sources, has been compiled into a user-friendly web-based database by LocalCensus.com.
I’m not telling them sh*t. All you have to answer is how many people live in your home. Answer that and tell them to get lost.
All,
I participated in Operation Chaos by voting for Hillary. I experienced the caucus fraud perpetrated by ACORN. I personally witnessed the caucus leaders, who were Obama supporters, fill in information that voters left blank on the caucus sign-up sheets. (Yes, I reported it and filed a legal affidavit on what I witnessed.)
I have no doubt that any questions you leave unanswered will be answered for you to THEIR benefit. They’ll use the census information to make their vision of America a statistical reality. If it helps them to lower the median household income to create the reality of more Americans living in poverty, they’ll do it.
So consider the consequences of leaving answers blank. Yes, giving them too much information that can be used against you later is dangerous. But not answering can be just as dangerous, because they’ll create their own reality.
Just a thought ...
Obama— if anything —is nothing short of brilliant.
________________
LOL LOL. He is far from brilliant. He follows orders well, PERIOD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.