Posted on 05/12/2009 3:31:27 PM PDT by Scanian
One more reason why I detest the left is that they are constantly trying to distort reality in the manner so accurately described by George Orwell. This may seem like a trivial example, but the in-your-face insistence that our first lady is some kind of smokin' hot babe is a case in point. All heterosexual men know that this is an outrageous lie. Who are they trying to kid, and why?
Look, we're talking about an average looking woman here. Sarah Palin is not going to lose any sleep over the comparison. But why is this lie being promulgated with such urgency and to such absurd lengths by the liberal media? There must be something more significant going on when someone is in such an insistent state of denial. It reminds me of the liberal love-fest over the Edwards' marriage a couple of years ago. How'd that work out?
Here is a typical tongue bath by closet lesbian columnist Sally Quinn. She says that the first lady's arms -- her arms, fer cryin' out loud -- "are representative of a new kind of woman: young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving."
Hmm. That's quite a devastating indictment. A young, intelligent, and sexy woman is a "new kind of woman"? This is insane. Not only is Quinn seeing something in Michelle that isn't there, but she's not seeing things that have always been there in abundance. Or perhaps she's never strolled through the UCLA campus on a warm September day. Oh, mama!
(Excerpt) Read more at brutallyhonest.org ...
Butt Ugly
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That said, most leftist are just bigots blowing smoke up the Obamas behinds to make themselves think they are racism free.
My take..I'm glad Mrs. O looked nice...for once. Probably could have had a dress made to look the same for much less money. People are cutting back, the so-called "leaders" should be reflecting that.
IMHO perhaps it is because she is among the better looking women on the left so they have to pump her up to try to match what conservative women usually look like? Average says it all, on a scale of 1-10 definatley a 5 maybe a 6 but she is not drop dead gorgeous.
Liberal hagiography aside, I never thought Jackie O was all that good-looking. Marilyn Monroe was good-looking. Jackie O was merely not ugly - for a First Lady. Michelle is out-and-out ugly.
Mmmmm hmmmmmm.
When I go to the store, I am inundated with magazine covers of her. Constantly.
Pray tell, who is posing for all those covers? Who is doing all those interviews? Who is actively lobbying the public for her quest to be considered this mythical beauty and goddess? A stunt double? Nope - it is Michelle Obama doing that.
What she does is worse than what she looks like. She is angry, selfish, racist liar.
Other than that.....what a great First Lady.
Understood. Happy T-day Sky!
You too. Happy Thanksgiving!
That's an old thread. I was working with what it says in Barack's autobiography about a girl he dated.
But lately I have to wonder whether it's not just made up. What would I life story be without the one that got away?
Michelle’s looks would never be an issue if the liberals didn’t keep trying to pass her off as “most beautiful” or “classy” or whatever.
The woman has 11 toes! She’s a freaking mutant with a giant ass!
They need to stop telling us she’s Claudia Shiffer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.