Is Michelle Obama really "a smoking hot babe" as leftists love to tell us?

BrutallyHonest.org ^ | May 12, 2009 | Gagdad Bob

[Scanian]

One more reason why I detest the left is that they are constantly trying to distort reality in the manner so accurately described by George Orwell. This may seem like a trivial example, but the in-your-face insistence that our first lady is some kind of smokin' hot babe is a case in point. All heterosexual men know that this is an outrageous lie. Who are they trying to kid, and why?

Look, we're talking about an average looking woman here. Sarah Palin is not going to lose any sleep over the comparison. But why is this lie being promulgated with such urgency and to such absurd lengths by the liberal media? There must be something more significant going on when someone is in such an insistent state of denial. It reminds me of the liberal love-fest over the Edwards' marriage a couple of years ago. How'd that work out?

Here is a typical tongue bath by closet lesbian columnist Sally Quinn. She says that the first lady's arms -- her arms, fer cryin' out loud -- "are representative of a new kind of woman: young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving."

Hmm. That's quite a devastating indictment. A young, intelligent, and sexy woman is a "new kind of woman"? This is insane. Not only is Quinn seeing something in Michelle that isn't there, but she's not seeing things that have always been there in abundance. Or perhaps she's never strolled through the UCLA campus on a warm September day. Oh, mama!

[SIDENET]

She’s a friggin’ Sasquatch!

[freeplancer]

Yes, if you are into Frankensteinian shadow people.

[mamelukesabre]

She’s butt ugly.

Laura bush is more attractive. And that’s not saying much. That’s why you never heard people going on and on about how gorgeous laura was.

The lefties are pathetic.

[StandUpChuck]

woof,woof!

[ez]

They do it because it convinces the weak-minded. No-one in this society takes the time to learn ANYTHING anymore and simply regurgitates what they read in emails and see on TV.

[lormand]

If you like big linebackers in the NFL, then you will love Michelle Obama.

[KevinB]

They tried the same thing with Hillary Clinton. Didn’t stick.

[vetvetdoug]

She's butt ugly

No kidding. In the South she'd have to tie a pork chop around her neck to get the dogs to play with her.

[MediaMole]

She’s an average middle aged woman with two children. ...and there’s nothing wrong with that.

[exist]

She looks like something they talk about on Coast2CoastAM.

[ataDude]

+1

[y6162]

“She’s a friggin’ Sasquatch!”

She;s a big fat Oprah wannabe. Obamachev is hitting the white women around him. It’s only a matter of time.

[presidio9]

Why does the left need to insist that its current obsession is sexually attractive. Remember when they tried this with Hillary and then Chelsea Clinton. Remeber just a few weeks ago when some of these nutjobs were comparing her to Carla Bruni? I know, I still have trouble believing it myself, but these are the exact same people who compared the Williams Sisters to Anna Kournikova. I would be fair and say that Michelle Obama is not particularly good-looking, but by no means ugly. And she is dedicated to her own particular sense of style, which the liberals seem to like but I guess I don't get.

[Jacquerie]

Despite the comparisons by the Left, she’s no Jackie Kennedy.

[God luvs America]

cnsidering the babes of the left the past decade has been the likes of rosie o’donnell, hillary clinton, randi rodent and jeanine garafolo it is understandable...

[Argus]

She’s a hatchet-faced grinch with a grating voice and no grace whatsoever.

[Retired Greyhound]

I agree with you.

She looks like a normal woman, but certainly not the traffic stopping beauty the MSM would have us believe.

[waxer1]

Oh my Gawd that was funny.

All kidding aside, I really do not see the attraction there. I have to admit that Obama is a very attractive man and those two girls are adorable, but Michelle Ma Belle is not attractive at all.

[Secret Agent Man]

ANswer: No.

Next question.