Posted on 05/05/2009 1:16:13 PM PDT by mrmeangenes
We have seen quite a bit of Orly Taitz - derived material here on FR. The Taitz "crusade" was (as nearly as I can tell) based on original assertions by Phillip Berg -a Hillary Clinton supporter- about the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama for presidential office.
Disagreements between the Berg and the Taitz "camps" have come to a boil recently, and a lawsuit has been filed in Federal District Court by Mr. Berg and others.
The link provided shows the details of the 85 (?) page complaint for any who may be interested.
That quite a read.
I don’t have time to read the full complaint, but I would like to know if Berg has also named Orly as one of the people responsible for the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks?
Why does the right always shoot themselves in the foot when the left can make the kookiest allegations and people seem to swallow their swill?
Dueling wackjobs. Time to grab the popcorn.
Wackjobs, maybe.
But we hope they prevail.
"FOOD FIGHT!"
“I would like to know if Berg has also named Orly as one of the people responsible for the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks?”
You sure like to bring this up quite a bit don’t you? Sounds awlful fishy coming from someone who did not join us here until AFTER the 2000 and 2004 elections were held. DId you not hear about them or something?
Sorry, but I am not all that sure what Berg’s status as a 9/11 Truther had to do with the 2000 or 2004 election.
Tonight on THE ANDREA SHEA-KING SHOW we'll be discussing the Obama birth certificate issue...again. Dr. Orly Taitz put the word out at her site for plaintiffs to come on the show and explain their interest in the suit.
As of this writing, we have four guests planned for this evening, so the show has been extended to 90 minutes.
I've lost count on the number of suits brought in this action against Obama, so I'll work on having a more exact figure later, maybe by airtime. But, at last count, well over a month ago, there were 42 suits. Some have been rejected by the court for "standing" but none have ever been examined or decided on the core issue of citizenship. Congress has been hit with a class action as well. In addition, about a half dozen citizen grand juries have been held with more planned.
Also, it's estimated that Obama's law firms have racked up about a million dollars in legal fees defending these suits.
The issue: Is Obama a natural born citizen as defined by our constitution? I can't prove he isn't. And no one else can prove he is. Obama has the ability to put the issue to bed by showing his long-form birth certificate, but for some reason he's unable or unwilling to do so. Why? Your guess is as good as mine.
For the moment, forget about the natural born citizenship issue. Instead, think about this: Never in the history of this nation has a sitting president been hit with well over 50 legal actions pertaining to the issue of citizenship. If it happened before, I missed it. In my mind that's a news story, plain and simple. But the MSM will not ask Obama or his press secretary the one obvious question.
Conspiracy theory? No. Red flags.
Tune in tonight as we examine this issue. THE ANDREA SHEA-KING SHOW 9 PM ET.
**Click here only if you're genuinely interested in learning more.
American Thinker posted this Nov '08.
I wonder what will come to light when that OMG moment arrives ?
Well that certainly makes the hunt for Obama’s BC look credible
Now the MSM will do a Special Report entitled
*An in Depth Journey into Right Wing Conspiracys* narrated by Keith Over-Bite
Some people seem to think that producing the long-form certificate won’t be enough and that people will just want more and more proof. That’s how they deal with the fact that he certainly appears to be hiding something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.