Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli Scientists Make a Major Hydrogen Fuel Breakthrough
Israel National News/Yidwithlid ^ | 4/7/09 | Yidwithlid

Posted on 04/07/2009 5:35:53 PM PDT by Shellybenoit

Developing a way to create hydrogen fuel from water is a "Holy Grail" of alternate fuel development. Many consider Hydrogen fuel sells the perfect pollution-free alternative to fuel automobiles. In these cells Hydrogen is consumed by a pollution-free chemical reaction, not combustion. So the fuel cell simply combines hydrogen and oxygen chemically to produce electricity, water, and waste heat. Nothing else. hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, it would take millenniums to run out. Up until now the major problem with creating hydrogen fuel cells is the chemical process needed to seperate the hydrogen and the oxygen used as much energy as it produced. The Weizmann Institute in Israel may have found a way to solve that problem:

(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: alternatefuel; hydrogenfuel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: keat
“hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe”

...except stupidity.

Cheers!

21 posted on 04/07/2009 6:47:43 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; ShadowAce; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Thanks gw. That excerpt was pretty bad though, had to go to the originating page. VERY interesting:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130806


22 posted on 04/07/2009 7:03:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

It is relatively easy to turn hydrogen into clean energy. The problem is getting clean energy in order to to make hydrogen.


23 posted on 04/07/2009 7:33:07 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It potentially minimizes the need for oil, and it's from Israel?

Now the Arabs will *REALLY* hate the JOOOOOOOOOOOOS. /sarc>

Cheers!

24 posted on 04/07/2009 7:48:30 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

That would be epic sweetness!


25 posted on 04/07/2009 7:52:09 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

“.... it would take millenniums to run out.”

I’d hate to be around when that happens....


26 posted on 04/07/2009 7:56:00 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Yarmulke good point there.


27 posted on 04/07/2009 8:12:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hiddigeigei; keat
"Closest naturally occuring source: The Sun.Have fun retreiveing it, don't forget the coppertone."

"Good heavens! They've come up wth the perpetual motion machine."

Why is it, that on every thread that involves potential alternate energy technology, numbskull nutcases like you two pop up with know-nothing comments like the above????

28 posted on 04/08/2009 4:03:00 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
"Normally I would dismiss the idea that someone could produce hydrogen from water using less energy than one gets by oxidizing the hydrogen produced."

Where do you dredge THIS idea up?? There are two energy inputs into the process, one photochemical and one thermal. I see nothing in the article that implies that there is less energy used to produce the H2 than is obtained by oxidizing it.

29 posted on 04/08/2009 4:03:14 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKV
"Properly used, fine, but lots of engineering needed."

Once upon a time, the same was true for gasoline. Hydrogen is used on a daily basis at tens of thousands of locations in the US. Very few problems. The "lots of engineering" has already been done.

30 posted on 04/08/2009 4:03:27 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Where do you dredge THIS idea up??

Sorry genius. I guess I didn't choose my words carefully enough for you. I was thinking of the energy from other stored energy sources normally needed to separate hydrogen and oxygen such as electrical energy used in electrolysis. The light from the sun utilized in this process is effectively infinite and so it doesn't really count.

ML/NJ

31 posted on 04/08/2009 6:04:03 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

Poetic Justice


32 posted on 04/08/2009 6:05:50 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: keat
“hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe” Closest naturally occuring source: The Sun Have fun retreiveing it, don't forget the coppertone.

We could always get it at night. ;-)

33 posted on 04/08/2009 6:06:27 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Why is it, that on every thread that involves potential alternate energy technology, numbskull nutcases like you two pop up with know-nothing comments like the above????

Just the basic Laws of Physics my FRiend, there are only three of them and they are not that difficult to understand.

They have not been violated yet, except by the Almighty.

34 posted on 04/08/2009 10:47:03 AM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
"“When we exposed this third complex to light at room temperature"...

OK. If I understand this correctly, my vehicle's fuel will have to be generated in a "closed" system to contain the fuel, but will have to be generated in an "open" system so that the 3rd stage can be completed. That is, unless a flashlight will suffice. Then my key-ring flashlight can be connected through an O-ring into the "closed" fuel generator.

Now I have to figure out how many batteries I have to keep on hand.

IAC, I'm trying to avoid even thinking about the net efficiency of the reversion of the 500 lbs (?) of the metal complex to it's original state so that I won't have to haul a trailer full of the stuff for replacement.

I'm really encouraged. Got to try to figure how much H2 will be needed to run a Ford 350 hauling whatever.

35 posted on 04/08/2009 10:52:55 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Meamwhile an islam-a-nazi yoot-groupe has developed a new blade sharpening technique that keeps the blade sharp even after cutting through tough neck-bones so that more beheadings can be done between sharpenings and the arms won’t get so tired./sarc


36 posted on 04/08/2009 11:07:39 AM PDT by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Why is it, that on every thread that involves potential alternate energy technology, numbskull nutcases like you two pop up with know-nothing comments like the above????
Because I've studied physics and chemistry. The laws of thermodynamics (which have never been broken) tell us you can't break the chemical bonds that hold hydrogen atoms to oxygen, then combine them back together and gain energy. You can't wind up a spring and get more energy out of it by letting it unwind then it took to wind it. You can't un-burn wood ashes and then burn them again.
37 posted on 04/08/2009 11:55:32 AM PDT by Hiddigeigei (quem deus vult perdere prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hiddigeigei; Wonder Warthog

Meet Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot - the original numbskull nutcase.

38 posted on 04/08/2009 12:08:14 PM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hiddigeigei
"Because I've studied physics and chemistry. The laws of thermodynamics (which have never been broken) tell us you can't break the chemical bonds that hold hydrogen atoms to oxygen, then combine them back together and gain energy. You can't wind up a spring and get more energy out of it by letting it unwind then it took to wind it. You can't un-burn wood ashes and then burn them again."

Maybe you should spend a little more time reading the article, which says nothing like the above. The chemical process involved contains not one, but two energy inputs---on photochemical and one thermal. So your comment stands as idiotic. As to "studying chemisty and physics", I have PhD in the former--so go back to school.

39 posted on 04/08/2009 1:45:38 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: keat

See 39. It applies to you, too.


40 posted on 04/08/2009 1:46:13 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson