To: John Semmens
The very fact that so-called conservatives donate more should be enough to raise anyone’s suspicions about the equity of allowing these tax deductions In any other time, under any other circumstances, such an utterance would be a one-way ticket to the loony bin.
If you give more you should be punished as inequitable? Up is down, white is black, dogs and cats...
2 posted on
03/30/2009 6:40:34 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
To: John Semmens
You need to identify your threads as being parodies. I about had a stroke.
3 posted on
03/30/2009 6:41:49 PM PDT by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: John Semmens
The sad part is how difficult it is to separate satire from what is really said. I give Chrissy Mathews as my “Exhibit A”.
7 posted on
03/30/2009 7:28:26 PM PDT by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: John Semmens
Damn, John, I let my guard down and you gotcha’ed me. You are too good at this.
8 posted on
03/30/2009 7:47:13 PM PDT by
Excellence
(What Madoff is to finance Gore is to global warming.)
To: John Semmens
“When you think about it, tax deductions for charitable giving are an anarchic method of distributing the nation’s wealth,”
Well, asshat, the nation's wealth doesn't belong to the government, and therefor isn't yours to decide who to distribute it to. Someone needs to start poking these idiots in the eye with a sharp stick every time they make their wealth distribution spiel.
To: John Semmens
It is so sad that I thought this was real.
There is MORE than a “grain of truth” here — this is how these people think.
But I admit being had ;)
11 posted on
03/31/2009 12:52:46 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson