Posted on 03/30/2009 2:05:52 PM PDT by euram
YIKES :0
What kind of woman would stay married to this piece of human debris? Certainly not a conservative one.
I’m a Palin defender who’ll admit that she has some flaws. I wish that she was more of a free marketer instead of a populist, for example. But calling her unqualified or not ready is simply disingenuous. Of the possible contenders in 2012, she is the best candidate available, all because she has the ability to speak directly to the people and broadcast a clear, conservative, pro-America agenda.
I liked her remarks about being annoyed. It was very honest and it helped to highlight that the questioning was meant to cause her harm. She also said that she wasn’t allowed to talk about what she wanted, like Obama’s mistaken policies. It seems she was annoyed by that too. I liked it that she seems to be strong, she is strong enough to realize that she was annoyed and is brave enough to admit it. That takes courage. She said that she didn’t like it when Coric questioned her about which magazines she read. According to Palin, she took that as a suggestion that she was out of touch because she lived in Alaska. I could understand it from Palin’s point of view after Palin explained it. I think it refreshing that someone in Palin’s position is bold enough to unmask the dirty tricks of the leftist media. That is refreshing. How many people just never do that? Just about everyone. Palin has good leadership qualities.
Do you see the credibility problem? Have you joined the payroll of any politicians or political committees since Oct 4, or did it take you well over a month (long after Gibson and Coric) to conclude that Sarah is a bimbo that is sexually manipulating men that should know better?
“She personalized it by being so unqualified yet acting like a narcissist who thinks the country owes her something just because she wants it.”
Palin’s an unqualified narcissist. . . rri-i-i-ight.
So what does that make your little lord barry bohica?
Nary a post of yours in forum that does not mention Mrs. Palin.
Go back to bed, sleeper-freeper.
pieces. . .
tahDeetz
This is beyond stupid. Sure, invoking the name “Sarah Palin” will get their lunatic fringe kook base fired up, but will anyone with a brain buy Democrat attacks on Palin? You have to be beyond braindead to not be able to see that Dems are distracting from their own miserable failures here. Sarah Palin is as far away from Washington as you can get, and has NOTHING to do with any GOVERNMENT caused problems that we are facing.
Tomorrow, we will see if this plan works. In the NY-20 special election, Murphy is maling junk mail calling Tedisco a tool for the Bush/Rush/Palin agenda. The junk mailings does not state what that agenda is.
This is really stretching it as Palin is Governor of Alaska and has nothing to do with the problems they are dishing out on this nation in DC so this will backfire. And Alaska is doing good unlike the Demonrat states with their billions of dollars of debt and taxes and more taxes. I don’t see how they will drag her into national debate when the people who are ignorant are even going to wonder how Palin fits in to being ripped apart on the national stage. They are imploding with their total control of gov’t and are trying to take the attention away from Demonrat incompetence and myths. It’s all on them now no matter how they try to drag out a new Republican to demonize. Karma is a b***h there, Carville.
You are exactly right....some people should hit the dictionary once in a while. I did a college paper on narcissism and Sarah Palin is no narcissist.
Each of your statements is the opposite of the truth.
haha!
Perfect!
Great job on the photo, Phil!!
Who is it that you are really supporting? Palin or the idea of Palin, that she tells it like it is when the reality is she can’t even say “it” much less like “it is.” I sure would love a leader like the one that Palin Bullshits being like. She tries to project an image of a leader that she knows people want but that she isn’t capable of being. She Bullshits about being authentic. And that’s scary. Because a whole lot of people are buying it. She ain’t no Ronald Reagan or Margret Thatcher, because they actually HAD something to say and didn’t just talk about “having something to say.” That’s the difference. I don’t know, maybe I am being unfair. There is always that possibility, but right now I don’t think so. People only have to go on what they see and so far Palin’s performance sucks.
This is a WARNING to any Democrats out there who have any common sense.
Read the story about Joseph in the bible. He was tossed in a well. and then later he became 2nd in Command to the Pharaoh.
Keep attacking this woman and her family. Keep attacking. I am telling you it, it will bite you in the ass one of these days.
Look what we got here. Another Palin hater. This is one is not hiding it with a code words. Like a roach crawling on white carpet.
Go back to Democratic Underground or the DailyKos.
Please never darken FR with your presence ever again.
You have any examples? I think it's was the head of the other ticket that can't talk without training wheels. If McCain had won the election and then promptly died, do you think a President Palin would be unable to give a press conference without a teleprompter. Besides that, when you make completely unsupportable and uncheckable assertions that employ some figure of speech like like this, it just tells readers something about your your emotions and feelings, and nothing about Palin. It's like me saying that you don't have your groove on, and never will. What does that mean? What does that really tell anybody about you? Nothing? What does it tell them about me? That I'm a sloppy thinker.
I sure would love a leader like the one that Palin Bullshits being like. She tries to project an image of a leader that she knows people want but that she isn’t capable of being. She Bullshits about being authentic. And that’s scary.
Apart from the barnyard language better suited to DU, that's an incredibly lame and unverifiable pair of assertions. Exactly how do you know what kind of leader she's capable of being, and based on what? You sure thought she had leadership in her bones back in October. What has changed? Your employer? And what do you mean about her BSing about being authentic? Do you have a quote of her bragging about her authenticity? If you did, what would be scary about that? Do people with delusions of authenticity present a danger to the republic somehow?
I don’t know, maybe I am being unfair. There is always that possibility, but right now I don’t think so.
No. You're either in the employ of somebody threatened politically by Palin and it's your job to be a troll, or you are trying to be fashionable, and fit in with some set. I mean we all know she's a dope, right? What specifics are needed? You've presented shallow, not-ready-for-prime-time arguments about how shallow and not-ready-for-prime-time Palin is.
People only have to go on what they see and so far Palin’s performance sucks.
I'll ask again. When did you come to this conclusion (it had to be after Oct 4), and why does it differ so radically from your earlier opinion of her? And, have you ever stopped for just a minute to consider the outrageously unfair an impossible situation she was put in once the left identified her as a threat? Is there a person alive that seriously believes Joe Biden is a more substantial person that Palin? Did anybody ever ask Biden what he read with the clear implication that somebody as dumb as him maybe didn't know how? How would he have fared in such a confrontation? Would Charlie Gibson have scowled at Bidon while looking over his reading glasses? The "Palin is a Lightweight" thing is nothing more than a symptom of our misbegotten culture and the savagery the left projects toward anyone they culturally can't figure out. You've apparently fallen for it.
Actually, rodeo-mammy is really a Mitt Romneyista.
Her verbiage could have fooled me.
That being said. . .
Helmet-hair has no chance in 12.
What I find fascinating is that I am put to more intellectual scrutiny then a woman running for President. Does that make any sense? You should wish Palin could express herself as good as I can. And I will admit that you are smarter then me. But this is sad, that I as a poster am expected to be smarter then you yet you don’t expect the same from Palin. This is a blind spot on your part. I have no problem at all admitting that you are smarter then me. I wish others were as honest. I am just a person expressing an opinion. I sure get people upset, that means they are getting what I am saying and they don’t like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.