Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'How To' Guide for Socialist/Communist Change: Public Education
Eagle Forum ^ | March 25, 2009 | Phyllis Schafly

Posted on 03/25/2009 11:27:00 AM PDT by This Just In

Prior to the 1960s, public schools and teachers clearly accepted their role in defining the culture of the youngsters under their supervision. The public schools, using a McGuffey-Reader-style curriculum, were the mechanism through which American kids learned not only the basics, but also values such as honesty and patriotism, and immigrant kids assimilated by learning our language, laws and customs.

For example, The American Citizens Handbook, published for teachers by the National Education Association in 1951, proclaimed: "It is important that people who are to live and work together shall have a common mind — a like heritage of purpose, religious ideals, love of country, beauty, and wisdom to guide and inspire them." This message was fortified in this Handbook by selections suitable for memorization, such as Old and New Testament passages, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Golden Rule, the Boy Scout oath, and patriotic songs.

My, how public schools and teachers unions have changed since 1951!

The turning point in public schools came in the 1960s with the vast influence of the Humanist John Dewey and his Columbia Teachers College acolytes, who argued against objective truth, authoritative notions of good and evil, religion and tradition. Sidney Simon's 1972 book Values Clarification, which sold nearly a million copies, was widely used to teach students to "clarify" their values, i.e., cast off their parents' values and make their own moral (or immoral) choices.

Then the public schools welcomed the Kinsey-trained sexperts to change the sexual mores of our society from favoring sex-in-marriage to diversity. Concepts of right and wrong were banished, and children were taught about varieties of sex without reference to what is moral, good, or even legal.

Meanwhile, elementary and secondary school curricula suffered a vast dumbing down. Phonics and traditional arithmetic were censored out. Students were allowed to graduate without learning to read or calculate. While tolerating massive illiteracy, the public schools are now powerfully impacting our culture by inculcating the values of situation ethics, diversity, and the easy acceptance of sex outside of marriage. American history and literature courses now teach the doctrines of U.S. guilt and multiculturalism instead of the greatness of our heroes and successes.

By the 1980s, the public schools were rejecting the Meyer-Pierce doctrine that parents have the fundamental right to control the upbringing of their own children. The Meyer-Pierce doctrine is described in two U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the 1920s, which we thought was settled law.1

By the 1990s, public schools had adopted the attitude best described by Hillary Clinton: the "village" (i.e., the government) should raise the child. Public schools, backed by anti-parent resolutions adopted by the National Education Association at its annual conventions, have become fortresses in which the administrators exercise near-absolute power to determine the students' values, morals, attitudes and hopes, while parents are kept outside the barricades.

Using activist judges to shore up their monopoly power, the schools persuaded the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court to rule in 20052 that a public school can teach students "whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise," and that parents' right to control the upbringing of their children "does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door." After heavy criticism in the U.S. House, the court tried to soften the "threshold" sentence but reaffirmed its decision.

The meaning of "whatever" is spelled out in anti-parent, pro-public-school decisions handed down in five circuits within the last two years. Federal courts upheld the right of public schools to indoctrinate students in Muslim religion and practices,3 to force students to watch a one-hour pro-homosexual video,4 to force students to attend a program advocating homosexual conduct that used minors in sexually suggestive skits,5 to censor any mention of Intelligent Design,6 to use classroom materials that parents consider pornography,7 to force students to answer nosy questionnaires with suggestive questions about sex, drugs and suicide,8 and to deny a divorced father's right to get his son's school records.9

1 Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925).

2 Fields v. Palmdale School District (2005).

3 Eklund v. Byron Union School District (2005).

4 Boyd Gay-Straight v. Boyd Board of Education (2006).

5 Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions (1995).

6 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005).

7 Evans-Marshall v. Board of Education (2005).

8 C.N. v. Ridgewood Board of Education (2005).

9 Crowley v. McKinney (2005).


TOPICS: Education; Government; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: communism; education; nea; phyllisschlafly; publicschools; schlafly; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: JenB
and not by armchair quarterbacks and naysayers whom reap the rewards of those with solid conviction and character.

Wait a minute... If I am having you homeschool my kids, which one of us is the 'armchair quarterback' and which is the 'naysayer'? And who is reaping the rewards? It can't be our offspring because that would make us 'those with solid conviction and character' which is apparently not the case. I am really confused.
21 posted on 03/25/2009 1:38:26 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Wait, what? Then what do post 15 and 16 mean? I am even more confused now. Are there two of you posting under the same screen name?


22 posted on 03/25/2009 1:39:59 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JenB

I was not homeschooled, but considering the gov’t schools I went to (yecch) I would’ve been better off if I had.


23 posted on 03/25/2009 1:40:28 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Red herrings, anyone?

You stated that nothing has changed.

Springboarding into other topics doesn’t change the issue I addressed.

As a result of liberal, anti-Christian ideology in the public school system, a whole lot has changed.

You will note that I did not mention anything concerning overhauling the current public ed. system.


24 posted on 03/25/2009 1:43:08 PM PDT by This Just In (Support Christian Homeschoolers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

I did both so I know what I was missing, er, not missing.


25 posted on 03/25/2009 1:43:19 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Oh, I’m definitely the naysayer, and you’re the armchair quarterback. That is the proper delegation of labor I think.


26 posted on 03/25/2009 1:45:11 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

So would a lot of people. Glad that I didn’t have to suffer. Homeschooling was great, it’ll probably be even more fun with my own kids.


27 posted on 03/25/2009 1:46:31 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
My point is this. The schools system is not broken. It is working exactly as it was always intended to work. The only difference is the character of the people in control of it. The flaw however does not lie with them, or with lack of Christian character in the schools. The flaw goes all the way back to the intended function of a centrally controlled standardized public education system.

It is like claiming the flaw with NAZIsm was Hitler. That is not the case. The flaws were in the whole system. The fact that the leader is evil is only a problem when the system is set up to give that leader total power. It is an imperfect analogy because Hitler set up the system but I think you get my point.

Many think public schools area a great idea but it has just degraded somehow. I think the whole concept of having a standardized school administered by the central government and run by a unionized teaching corps is fatally flawed.
28 posted on 03/25/2009 1:50:05 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Good. I will not have that opportunity, since I will never have children, but the more kids you keep away from public school, the better.
29 posted on 03/25/2009 1:50:47 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Oh, I’m definitely the naysayer, and you’re the armchair quarterback. That is the proper delegation of labor I think.

But I don't own an armchair, or even like football.
30 posted on 03/25/2009 1:51:06 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

It might be a metaphor, possibly.


31 posted on 03/25/2009 1:52:13 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
since I will never have children

That sounds 'defeatist'. You must be hanging out with us too much.
32 posted on 03/25/2009 1:52:37 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JenB

Metaphors? I am far to weak-minded for those. They scare me.


33 posted on 03/25/2009 1:53:50 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

LOL, maybe. But that decision was made long ago.


34 posted on 03/25/2009 1:54:28 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JenB

mmmm red herrings, yum!

What is for dinner?


35 posted on 03/25/2009 1:55:01 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

You can always find some to brainwash. They have a whole foster system set up for that.


36 posted on 03/25/2009 1:55:53 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Thank you for clarifying.

I disagreed with your idea suggesting that it’s the same difference, if you will. It is not.

It is true that public education will reflect centralized governments collective philosophy, which is why I believe education should be a private enterprise.

You will admit that our society, as I substantiated in this thread and initial comment, reflects the change that has taken place in our history.


37 posted on 03/25/2009 1:56:09 PM PDT by This Just In (Support Christian Homeschoolers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Um... hope and change?

No, wait, that wasn’t the right cue card. Stupid teleprompter.


38 posted on 03/25/2009 2:05:45 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
You will admit that our society, as I substantiated in this thread and initial comment, reflects the change that has taken place in our history.

Certainly. And a good part of that was done but taking God out of schools. Which was done by the miss-understood concept of 'separation of church and state', which was only possible because the schools were state run. Hence the problem with the schools is not them being broken, which is the premise of the opening lines of the article. Instead the problem is with having the government run them in the first place.

My 'same difference' you are disagreeing with was about this:
"It is important that people who are to live and work together shall have a common mind — a like heritage of purpose, religious ideals, love of country, beauty, and wisdom to guide and inspire them."

As Jen already stated, with references, the public schools were set up to make people of 'common mind'. What that common mind IS has changed but that does not mean the above quote has changed. The average output of the public school system still shares those features:
a like heritage of purpose,
--Liberalism
religious ideals,
--that all religions are the same and you should never talk to anyone about yours (if you are Christian)
love of country
--As long as that love includes all countries and multiculturalism
beauty,
--which is totally relative and should not be used to judge, unless someone is really popular and cool
and wisdom to guide and inspire them
--Which they get from Liberalism


When it comes down to it most of the things in that quote are still what the public school is doing. The definitions of what those things are has just been changed.
39 posted on 03/25/2009 2:11:14 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

bookmark


40 posted on 03/25/2009 2:45:32 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (This is a picture, not an advertisement..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson